Now that wealth worth billions of dollars have been discovered in Ananthapadmanabha Temple at Thiruvananthapuram, there is a lot of hypocritical propaganda from the pseudosecular media — backed by Muslims, Christians, leftists and anti-nationalists — that the wealth should be taken over.

Postscript: The Government speaks of modernising madrasas — where terrorists are produced. Has it ever spoken of modernising the Vedashalas or Hindu Temples. Never, they are only busy starving Temples.

There is a season and reason for everything.

The final jump is the quantum jump — Asthavakra’s dialogue with the one.

In several online debate, several atheists pounce on me to prove the existence of God.

That is the beauty of Hindutva.

THE HINDU CONCEPT OF GOD

If Ramdev’s seduction fails to make an impact, she will sink like the Titanic.. Any doubts.

Do you know who is the greatest real estate mafia in India.

It is not the Muslim underworld or Chotta Rajan. It is neither the Ambanis and the Tatas.

It is the great Church.

They are the richest land owners in India, although they are called the minorities.

They are the richest land usurpers too. Can we have the records.

Foolish me. The mafia does not have any records… and in case you ask for records…..? Add to it, they are looting the nation in the minority card although they are the global majority.

Postscript: The media will only ask accounts from the Hindus. Minority mafia are beyond accounts.

NDTV says that Tony Blair reads the Koran everyday.

The judges have delivered their verdict in the heresy trial of Dutch freedom politician Geert Wilders for inciting hatred against Muslims. NOT GUILTY of all charges of inciting hatred against Muslims. When do the Islamic supremacists go on trial for inciting hatred against non-Muslims?

Charges against Geert Wilders
Intentionally offending Muslims
Inciting hatred against Muslims
Inciting discrimination against Muslims
Inciting hatred of non-western immigrants
The islamic supremacists who initiated the case told judges that Mr Wilders’ comments have led to a rise in discrimination and violence against Muslims. This is the enforcement of blasphemy laws under Islamic law.

The case began on October 4 last year, but collapsed after three weeks when a special legal panel ruled the judges may have shown partiality following a string of legal blunders. New judges were then sworn in and the case was heard again this year. (Dutch News)

The Islamic supremacist ‘plaintiffs’ were seeking a one-euro fine. But it’s not about a largely symbolic fine, it is about a triumph over the tenets of Western law and free speech They said if they didn’t get their symbolic one-euro pne,y don’t get it, they say they will consider taking their case to the European Court of Human Rights. Ah yes, take it to the anti-humans under the guise of human rights.

Liveblogging the verdict at Facebook

The judge has started off by saying that most of the statements for which Geert Wilders has been charged are attributable to him. Two of the statements, however, were attributable to newspaper writers – a not guilty verdict for both these statements.
Charge #2 Incitement to hatred of people, i.e. Muslims, based on their religion – NOT GUILTY!!

Charge #4 Incitement to hatred of people, i.e. non-Western immigrants and/or Moroccans, based on their race – NOT GUILTY!

Charge #5 Incitement to discrimination, against people, i.e. non-Western immigrants and/or Moroccans, based on their race – NOT GUILTY!

FITNA – Geert’s film – NOT GUILTY for the statements made by this movie!

And while Wilders is not part of the coalition government, the support of Mr Wilders’s Freedom Party (PVV) keeps it in power. If convicted Wilders could have spent 16 months in prison and fined 10,000 euros (13,800 dollars). The ruling is expected early next month.

This was a seminal case. Wilders is our proxy – the West is on trial.

These pseudo peddlers of globalisation want to nationalise Hindu Temples.

Arnab Goswami of the Times Now states that the Sai trust should be nationalised. Another Congress politician says that ISKCON should be nationalised.

Why not nationalise Times of India and Times Now? If we nationalise the media, atleast,the fifth column will stop.

Why not nationalise the Congress Party?

Why not nationalise the Maoists/Communists and Naxalites?

Why not nationalise the Mutlinational Conglomerates?

Why the double standards? Why only Hindus?

Can any pseudo answer me? HELLO.

Let us create an endowment for all these so that the national loot will be stopped

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2011/06/20/prakashanand-saraswati-the-fugitive-guru-of-barsana-dham.html

Moreover, most of these allegations are toothless. In fact, there were attempts to make fake blue films of the Gurus by employing body doubles. Hindus should beware of these designs and stop knee jerk reactions when it comes to the Gurudom.

This is a message that I received from Ananda Sunkanpally: I have watched many times tv discourses of Swamy Prakashanand Saraswati and his teachings on ‘BRAHMA SUTRAS’ was very great…Amazing Vedanta knowledge he poured in those discourses, I can never forget him, it is a pity that he was so much maligned and some fools believe anything written by pseudo journalists…Osho says “A journalist is an Impotent politician”…

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rajiv-malhotra/dharma-religion_b_875314.html

Rajiv Malhotra, founder, Infinity Foundation, writes:

The word “dharma” has multiple meanings depending on the context in which it is used. Monier-Williams’ Sanskrit-English Dictionary lists several, including: conduct, duty, right, justice, virtue, morality, religion, religious merit, good work according to a right or rule, etc. Many other meanings have been suggested, such as law or “torah” (in the Judaic sense), “logos” (Greek), “way” (Christian) and even ‘tao” (Chinese). None of these is entirely accurate and none conveys the full force of the term in Sanskrit. Dharma has no equivalent in the Western lexicon.

Dharma has the Sanskrit root dhri, which means “that which upholds” or “that without which nothing can stand” or “that which maintains the stability and harmony of the universe.” Dharma encompasses the natural, innate behavior of things, duty, law, ethics, virtue, etc. Every entity in the cosmos has its particular dharma — from the electron, which has the dharma to move in a certain manner, to the clouds, galaxies, plants, insects, and of course, man. Man’s understanding of the dharma of inanimate things is what we now call physics.

British colonialists endeavored to map Indian traditions onto their ideas of religion so as to be able to comprehend and govern their subjects; yet the notion of dharma remained elusive. The common translation into religion is misleading since, to most Westerners, a genuine religion must:

1) be based on a single canon of scripture given by God in a precisely defined historical event;
2) involve worship of the divine who is distinct from ourselves and the cosmos;
3) be governed by some human authority such as the church;
4) consist of formal members;
5) be presided over by an ordained clergyman; and
6) use a standard set of rituals.

But dharma is not limited to a particular creed or specific form of worship. To the Westerner, an “atheistic religion” would be a contradiction in terms, but in Buddhism, Jainism and Carvaka dharma, there is no place for God as conventionally defined. In some Hindu systems the exact status of God is debatable. Nor is there only a single standard deity, and one may worship one’s own ishta-devata, or chosen deity.

Dharma provides the principles for the harmonious fulfillment of all aspects of life, namely, the acquisition of wealth and power (artha), fulfillment of desires (kama), and liberation (moksha). Religion, then, is only one subset of dharma’s scope.

Religion applies only to human beings and not to the entire cosmos; there is no religion of electrons, monkeys, plants and galaxies, whereas all of them have their dharma even if they carry it out without intention.

Since the essence of humanity is divinity, it is possible for them to know their dharma through direct experience without any external intervention or recourse to history. In Western religions, the central law of the world and its peoples is singular and unified, and revealed and governed from above.

In dharmic traditions, the word a-dharma applies to humans who fail to perform righteously; it does not mean refusal to embrace a given set of propositions as a belief system or disobedience to a set of commandments or canons.

Dharma is also often translated as “law,” but to become a law, a set of rules has to be present which must: (i) be promulgated and decreed by an authority that enjoys political sovereignty over a given territory, (ii) be obligatory, (iii) be interpreted, adjudicated and enforced by courts, and (iv) carry penalties when it is breached. No such description of dharma is found within the traditions.

The Roman Emperor Constantine began the system of “canon laws,” which were determined and enforced by the Church. The ultimate source of Jewish law is the God of Israel. The Western religions agree that the laws of God must be obeyed just as if they were commandments from a sovereign. It is therefore critical that “false gods” be denounced and defeated, for they might issue illegitimate laws in order to undermine the “true laws.” If multiple deities were allowed, then there would be confusion as to which laws were true.

In contrast with this, there is no record of any sovereign promulgating the various dharma-shastras (texts of dharma for society) for any specific territory at any specific time, nor any claim that God revealed such “social laws,” or that they should be enforced by a ruler. None of the compilers of the famous texts of social dharma were appointed by kings, served in law enforcement, or had any official capacity in the state machinery. They were more akin to modern academic social theorists than jurists. The famous Yajnavalkya Smriti is introduced in the remote sanctuary of an ascetic. The well-known Manusmriti begins by stating its setting as the humble abode of Manu, who answered questions posed to him in a state of samadhi (higher consciousness). Manu (1.82) tells the sages that every epoch has its own distinct social and behavioral dharma.

Similarly, none of the Vedas and Upanishads was sponsored by a king, court or administrator, or by an institution with the status of a church. In this respect, dharma is closer to the sense of “law” we find in the Hebrew scriptures, where torah, the Hebrew equivalent, is also given in direct spiritual experience. The difference is that Jewish torah quickly became enforced by the institutions of ancient Israel.

The dharma-shastras did not create an enforced practice but recorded existing practices. Many traditional smritis (codified social dharma) were documenting prevailing localized customs of particular communities. An important principle was self-governance by a community from within. The smritis do not claim to prescribe an orthodox view from the pulpit, as it were, and it was not until the 19th century, under British colonial rule, that the smritis were turned into “law” enforced by the state.

The reduction of dharma to concepts such as religion and law has harmful consequences: it places the study of dharma in Western frameworks, moving it away from the authority of its own exemplars. Moreover, it creates the false impression that dharma is similar to Christian ecclesiastical law-making and the related struggles for state power.

The result of equating dharma with religion in India has been disastrous: in the name of secularism, dharma has been subjected to the same limits as Christianity in Europe. A non-religious society may still be ethical without belief in God, but an a-dharmic society loses its ethical compass and falls into corruption and decadence.

Her articles have been very inflamatory. As an Hindu it has offended me.And what is bothering me is how could she get away with this.There has to be lot of noise regarding this and CNN-IBN should fire her.

I have written on her anti-Hindu dogmas point by point.

http://greathindu.com/2011/06/dogmas-from-cnn-sophist-sagarika-ghose/

On 29th January 2011 Sagarika Ghose tweeted the following on a social networking site Twitter “Notes from Bangkok airport: Indian males as a species must be the ugliest in the world! The ones on Twitter sound ugly too!” which was heavily criticized on twitter and was on top trending for 3 days in India.Her sexist and racist tweets were reported to TeamCNN and TeamCNN was asked if CNN endorsed her views. Though CNN network did not tender an apology on her behalf but tweeted back the following on 31′st January 2011 – Sagarika Ghose issued this apology:”My comments on Indian males was never intended to offend or hurt. Am deeply sorry if it did. My sincere apologies”

Hindu Religion Slander – On 23rd September 2010 Sagarika Ghose tweeted the following on a social networking site Twitter “whether or not lord rama is the rightful owner or a divine encroacher is a question unlikely to be settled in a hurry”. The screen shots of this tweet are still available across the internet. She was severely criticized for this tweet for being insensitive to Hindu religion and disrespectful towards the most revered Hindu deity

CNN had in the past fired one of its journalist Octavia Nasr based on a controversial tweet, however Sagarika Ghose continues to serve as the deputy editor and prime time anchor on the news network CNN-IBN.Many people have speculated that she enjoys the protection offered to her by her husband Rajdeep Sardesai who is editor-in-chief of CNN-IBN.

Here is an analysis on ethics of journalism and how Sagarika Ghose and her husband’s channel CNN-IBN flout them regularly.

1) Standards and reputation
Among the leading news organizations that voluntarily adopt and attempt to uphold the common standards of journalism ethics, adherence and general quality varies considerably. The professionalism, reliability and public accountability of a news organization are three of its most valuable assets.
Being deputy editor of CNN-IBN, Sagarika Ghose has shown little professionalism, reliability and public accountability. She is the one who coined the term Internet Hindus to refer to the tribe of people who have an opinion different from hers. Here are some of the tweets from Sagarika Ghose on the same – Internet Hindus want to `Islamise’ Hinduism: they are enamoured of the extremist version of Islam. Another one goes like this – Internet Hindus are like swarms of bees. they come swarming after you at any mention of Modi Muslims or Pakistan! . Using such demeaning phrases for the hindu majority of india is shocking.
Having read all these tweets, one wonders how CNN would have reacted when one of its top notch journalists like Anderson Cooper or Wolf Blitzer would have tweeted about Internet Christians on twitter but Rajdeep Sardesai who owns CNN-IBN seems to be least bothered about what his wife has been doing to their family owned channel. One must say the quality of news, journalists and professionalism exhibited by CNN-IBN is substandard than that of CNN.

2) Campaigning in the media
One particularly controversial question is whether media organizations should endorse political parties or candidates while debunking others. Political endorsements create more opportunities to construe favoritism in reporting, and can create a perceived conflict of interest.

Sagarika Ghose has been openly critical of the main opposition party of India – Bharatiya Janta Party and some of its friend organizations like RSS. Here are some of her tweets making fun of RSS and BJP – The RSS-oriented Twitter brigade is so predictable! Attack congress, they applaud, attack BJP they abuse and scream blue murder. Down with liberals, down with minorities, down with cong-media, shout Internet hindus/rss twitter brigade. Day in day out the same refrain. Nothing has been proved in courts till date regarding involvement of hindu organizations in some of the terror incidents that have happened in India in recent years but nonetheless CNN-IBN has been jumping on conclusion calling it “saffron/hindu terrorism” and running programs on it. Here is what Sagarika Ghose had tweeted – Are we in denial about `Hindu’/saffron/right wing terror?

With so much hatred against the main opposition party and its allies one wonders if CNN-IBN has sold itself to ruling party, become a mouth piece of it, giving little coverage to scams and short comings of the government.

3) Taste, decency and acceptability
Audiences have different reactions to depictions of violence, nudity, coarse language, or to people in any other situation that is unacceptable to or stigmatized by the local culture or laws. Even with similar audiences, different organizations and even individual reporters have different standards and practices. When certain distasteful or shocking material is considered important to the story, there are a variety of common methods for mitigating negative audience reaction. Advance warning of explicit or disturbing material may allow listeners or readers to avoid content they would rather not be exposed to. Offensive words may be partially obscured or bleeped. Potentially offensive images may be blurred or narrowly cropped. Descriptions may be substituted for pictures; graphic detail might be omitted. Disturbing content might be moved from a cover to an inside page, or from daytime to late evening, when children are less likely to be watching.

Apparently, Sagarika Ghose never attended any ethics and standards of journalism class. Her tweets surpasses all limits of decency and acceptability. They are as distasteful as the demeanor of lady herself. Here are some of Sagarika Ghose’s distasteful tweets – @bijutweets god was in a bad mood when he made the Indian male thats for sure.! , Notes from Bangkok airport: Indian males as a species must be the ugliest in the world! The ones on Twitter sound ugly too! , @prasannavishy you’re a gutter snipe. So many angry, racist and sexist views from a deputy editor of a news network that is broadcast across the nation will have dire consequences on young minds who try find their role models watching televisions and surfing internet. Without any stern action against the said deputy editor, people will become more tolerant towards racism which is not good for the nation.

Anderson Cooper grilling a Journalist for insensitive tweet (Added 02/19/11)

On 02/16/11 CNN posted on web, a 5 minutes interview of Anderson Cooper grilling Nir Rosen, the journalist who tweeted insensitive remarks about the sexual assault of CBS correspondent Lara Logan. Entire interview is available here. However, we have not seen any such interview questioning the intent of Sagarika Ghose’s insensitive, racist and sexist tweets on Indian men, possibly because
(1) CNN-IBN is CNN’s sister channel in India
(2) Sagarika Ghose is CNN-IBN’s deputy editor.
(3) Indians don’t deserve the same respect.

Whatever may be the reason, it just shows double standards and hypocrisy.

http://www.mediacrooks.com/2011/02/sagarika-ghose-tweets-should-twitter.html

Janata Party president Subramanian Swamy on Monday criticised Congress general secretary Digvijay Singh for proposing that Rahul Gandhi take over as Prime Minister and said that legally Mr. Gandhi and his sister were barred from the post.

In a statement, Dr. Swamy dubbed Mr. Singh as the “mouthpiece of the Janpath coterie” and said the coterie had “lost all hope on Manmohan Singh performing in the coming months as the 2G spectrum scam unravels and the list of accused lengthens with additions from the Congress.”

He accused Mr. Digvijay Singh of treating the Prime Minister as “some kind of regent in the Maino dynasty, waiting for Rahul to grow up.”

Dr. Swamy, however, argued that there was a legal bar on Mr. Gandhi becoming the Prime Minister “arising from Italian law which made him a citizen upon birth. He has never renounced this inherited citizenship and that he has travelled on Italian passport all over Europe on an alias.”

Dr. Swamy said Mr. Gandhi should “learn from the experience of his mother whose attempt to become the Prime Minister in 2004 was aborted when the then President of India Abdul Kalam wrote a letter (which is still to be published) which was read by two witnesses present when Ms. Sonia Gandhi received that letter, namely Natwar Singh and Manmohan Singh. It should now be perfectly clear to Ms. Sonia Gandhi as well as her two children that there is no legal way by which any of them can ever become the Prime Minister of India.”

This is a message that I received from one concerned Hindu. What he says is true:

We have reached a stage where Hindu society can be saved only from outside. We have 2 extremely dangerous executive moves that have been set in motion by UPA. 1) Bill pertaining to acts of religious violence. Here the provisions are so skewed that even if a Hindu is a victim, given Hindu is not a minority, he will still be held responsible. This does takes into account that Hindus can be a minority in a district like Mallapuram in Kerala or many such pockets in other states.

2) The second bill is about equal opportunities. This is a loose copy/paste of the America affirmative action committees. But the problem here is that this bill cover minority rights/protection in schools, colleges, offices and houses in a neighborhood. Given India has reservations this is redundant but the CON pigs have smartly tried to break into demographic cohesion of vote banks in a given neighborhood. So, if you were a home owner and you refuse to rent your house to a Muslim/Xian, there are provisions for this “minority” to lodge a complaint to this committee. Any evidence of prejudice will invite a fine of INR 500,000 and a non compliance of the committee’s recommendations in a month’s time will invite a fine of INR 100,000.

There is no use depending BJP anymore. The rainbow of Hindu orgnizations within India / outside must unite to form a block to reign upon the UPA politically. This was exactly what Francois Gautier wrote in his open letter more than a year ago to Hindu Gurudom at large.

http://ibnlive.in.com/blogs/sagarikaghose/223/62464/sagarika-ghoses-blog-ram-movement-redux.html
Here are “sophist” Sagarika Ghosh’s dogmas and my reply.
Dogma: The rightwing revolution is here.
Reality: Nothing but an attempt at tag & kill.

Dogma: The UPA has dispatched Ramdev to his ashram. The police action at Ram Lila Maidan was insupportable and the BJP has now gained a cause celebre. RSS and VHP have stood in full support of Ramdev from the start. Sangh parivar activists on Twitter are dubbing anyone critical of the Ramdev as a “Congress agent.”
Reality: it is not a protest for the sake of protest. The corruption is real. Swiss Bank accounts are real.. so is media corruption, courtesy Radiagate. A genuine attempt at removing corruption is given the RSS tag. The 2G spectrum was worth Rs. 1,76,000 crore.. and it would be naive to state that Sonia’s hand is not there. The Maharani is there behind everything. She is the Queen of Corruption. Even the Swiss magazine had listed her husband among the top Dictators owing an account in Swiss Bank to the tune of 2.5 billion dollars in 1991. Even Wikileaks and KGB archives are pointers to her culpability.

Dogma: The Ramdev phenomenon and to some extent the Anna campaign are part of a new revolution. This is India’s rightwing nationalist revolution. It is rightwing because it is based on national pride and individual entitlement; it is a movement of the middle and lower middle class buoyed up by 9 per cent growth which now seeks a responsive, overtly honest government and a hard state.
Reality: There is nothing right or left about fighting corruption. Corruption is a fact. Transparency is the way to remove it. That’s it.

Dogma: This rightwing revolution is closely linked to a Hindu consolidation spreading through society. Perhaps as a backlash to globalization, urban religiosity and bharatiya sankriti are fashionable; faith in gurus is growing and cuts across class. Ramdev jumps from colas to homosexuality to black money in his choice of enemies, yet his devotees’ faith remains constant.
Reality: Nothing right or left about Hindus. Hinduism is a way of life. Sagarika Ghosh tries to tag a genuine anti-corruption movement in a religious style.

Dogma: Notwithstanding the BJP’s crushing electoral defeats, culturally Hindu nationalist consolidation is gathering tremendous momentum, much of which feeds into the anti-corruption campaigns.
Reality: Probably, Sagarika Ghose does not realise that it was a narrow victory for the Congress, which had allegedly tampered with the EVMs (Electoral Voting Machines).

Dogma: The Ram Janmabhoomi movement, in a new urbane sophisticated avatar, is back.
Reality: Ram movement had never really left us. It was always there. We can’t forget our blood-spattered past unlike our pseudos journalists.

Dogma: It’s a revolution with virtues and dangers. Its virtues are, first, that it is based on an engaged sense of ‘desi’ cultural pride.
Reality: It is about corruption, first, second and third. Sonia and Congress ilk have looted the nation’s money and kept us in poverty. We want our money back. that’s it.

Dogma: Second, its forcing a debate where none existed on issues like corruption and black money. Black money is being generated in our economy every day and the government has failed to curb it. But the danger of the Hindu revolution is that it may overthrow constitutional liberal values and revive street justice, of which Ramdev’s prescription of death penalty for economic offences is one example and shoe throwing is another.
Reality: Now this is a secular movement. The Congress and the media (feeding on black money) is trying to sabotage a genuine anti-corruption movement. Why not a death penalty for those who are looting people and keeping them in poverty?

Dogma: It is also a revolution that is being played outside formal politics, at least for now. Govindacharya, one of the organizers of Ramdev’s movement, has been openly critical of the BJP leadership. Arun Jaitley and Sushma Swaraj are fighting a battle in parliament, not at the Ram Lila Maidan. But just as the Ram Mandir agitation was first begun by the VHP and later used by the BJP to come to power, there are those within the Sangh who are eyeing a similar opportunity to piggyback on an anti-corruption movement being built at the grassroots by Hindu outfits. North Indian elections next year in UP, Punjab and Uttarakhand will be a test of whether the BJP can convert Hindu consolidation into electoral victory.
Reality: BJP is a different ballgame altogether. The Ramdev movement is a movement to gain back our stolen wealth.

Dogma: ‘War against corruption’ is led by people of many hues, but it is also the Hindu revolution’s catch-all device to rally new support to the cause.
Reality: The anti-Hindu media is paranoid about Hindutva. It sees “Hindu ghosts” everywhere.

Dogma: Many protests are contained within the ‘anti-corruption’ umbrella. These are: protest against an overly westernized ‘elite class’, protest against ‘anti-national intellectuals’ embodied in the persona of Binayak Sen, and protest, at its very root, at rule by the ‘foreign-born’ Sonia Gandhi. It is no surprise therefore that Ramdev brought up Sonia’s foreign-ness again.
Reality: Our media will support anything foreign. It has treated Sonia with kidgloves. Can the media provide details of Sonia Gandhi’s foreign jaunts.

Dogma: Hatred of ‘foreign’ Sonia Gandhi and the Congress dynasty is the leitmotif and spur of the Hindu revolution. Its the reason why large numbers of middle class folk are lining up behind the Hindu revolution.
Reality: It is a fact that Sonia Gandhi has looted India. We are against anybody looting us. That is logical. However, Sagarika Ghosh suffers from convuluted logic.

Dogma: Analysts have pointed to rightwing consolidation in the lower judiciary gauged from the judgements on the Babri Masjid title suit as well as from judgements on Binayak Sen, both criticised by the apex court. The saffron thinktank Vivekananda Foundation consists of many public figures. Already the BJP is asking why Syed Ali Shah Geelani’s seminar did not get the same treatment as Ramdev. A court in Muzaffarpur has registered a case of ‘sedition’ against Digvijay Singh for his views on the yoga guru.
Reality: It is a fact that our pseudos are lenient on traitors and are keen tag indigenous Hindus as traitors.

Dogma: The first Hindu revolution was begun in the 1980s by the VHP, based on a desire to restore Hindu pride by building a Ram Mandir in Ayodhya. ‘Hindu rage’ at the ‘minority appeasement’ of the Rajiv Gandhi government in the Shah Bano case added to the momentum. The movement acquired a mass character through LK Advani’s rath yatras. ‘Pseudo secularists’ ‘Macaulay’s children’ were the words coined against critics at that time.
Reality: Hindu pride has always been there. The pseudos noticed it first in 1980. Besides, it is a fact that the Indian media journos suffer from colonial hangover.

Dogma: Today Bajrang Dal and VHP activists are angry with the BJP for letting the temple movement down, for straying towards the path of ‘Shining India’. The electoral defeats of 2004 and 2009 shocked the sangh. The consequence was a desperate search for a cause, a new rallying cry. Now the ‘war on corruption’ has taken the place of ‘Hindu pride’ and the ‘pseudo secularist’ has been replaced by the 2011 term ‘corrupt’.
Reality: Corruption is corruption. Loot is loot. Sagarika’s attempts to delink corruption to communalism does not cut any ice with me.

Dogma: Those like Kiran Bedi and Arvind Kejriwal may be genuinely driven by nation-building sentiments. Yet their voices are in danger of being drowned by those with more supporters on the street.
Reality: The battle against corruption is genuine. No amount of Sagarika sophistry can malign it.

Dogma: Will the Hindu rightwing revolution spell the death-knell of the UPA?
Reality: Hindus are neither right nor left. Hindus believe in being balanced. Sagarika would be better off if she reads Upanishads and educate herself about Hinduism.

Dogma: Rajiv Gandhi created his party’s nemesis by allowing the shilanyas at Ayodhya in 1989. Manmohan Singh too could prove unequal to rightwing consolidation. Already the UPA’s handling of Ramdev was pathetic. First kow-towing and next arresting him at midnight, showed how politically weak this government is.
Reality: Weak. The Congress Government is dictatorial. It is riding roughshod over people.

Dogma: India’s Hindu consolidation today has a benign face focused on forcing governments to deliver on corruption. But the Hindu revolution could start to devour liberal values if met with governmental paralysis. “Hang the corrupt’ or ‘jail anti-nationals’ or ‘bomb Pakistan” can’t become mantras of a modern rational India. UPA 2 needs to recognize the society it is confronting, start delivering on its anti-corruption campaign promises and look and act like a 24 x 7 government. Else, bit by bit its authority is being chipped away.
Reality: Now the Radia tainted Indian media stars are scared that the law is catching up with them.

Dogma: Today, its Ramdev and Anna. For tomorrow, who knows which new peoples messiah is waiting in the wings.
Reality: Yes, you are accountable. Better be straight and not corrupt. The days of looting India is over. Now everybody is accountable.

1. Madame Sonia, will you please comment on your Swiss Bank accounts and the article in Swiss magazine Schweizer Illustrierte >http://www.schweizer-illustrierte.ch/zeitschrift/500-millionen-der-schweiz-imeldas-faule-tricks# ?

10. Madame Arundatti Roy, can you comment on the litter of used condoms outside the place of your sham agitation?

…. the list goes on… but our honourable Indian journalists will never ask these questions because they have a deep inferiority complex towards the west and an intense self-hatred for Hinduism and Hindus.

Till then, I will continue my tirade against the anti-Hindu media and their silly western cohorts.

So things are going on and on. Hindus are taken for a ride.

Why don’t these bastards take stock of the Churches and mosques? That is neither Kosher nor halal. It is haram for the corrupt Indian Government that plays on the keyboard of the anti-Hindu media.

Rasleela is the ultimate in Hinduism. It is hard for people with Victorian sensibilities to appreciate the virtues of Rasleela.

So three cheers to the Lord of Love. Jai Radhakrishna.

To

Deepak Kamat.

Postscript: Kindly don’t kill me like you killed heathens in the past. If you do it, you will be fucking your own ass.

Nearly 71 people have been seriously injured as a result of police brutality at the Ram Lila Maidan? http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/article2081792.ece

What about Sonia Gandhi? Will she shed crococile tears for the victims? Not even a single words from the Super Prime Minister bitch — who is hiding behind the scene.

I told you earlier. The Congress is paranoid about RSS.

It sees RSS in everything even if it is public anger.

It is time for the Congress to clean up its act before they get engulfed in public anger.

Sonia might have to soon flee like Idi Amin of Uganda and Marcos of Philippines, who also held massive Swiss bank deposits like her.