Ram Setu

Udupi: Ram Sethu should be Preserved - Pejawar Swamiji

Udupi, Jul 26: Vishwesha Tirtha Swamiji of Pejawar
Math said on Friday that he was not against the Sethusamudram Project
but it should be implemented without destroying the Ram Sethu.

The swamiji told presspersons that the latest misinterpretation of
the Ramayana, in whichever language it was, had “hurt the religious and
spiritual feelings of the common people in the country”.

The Centre’s argument was absurd and skilful deception of the
scripture. Lord Ram had nowhere suggested the demolition of Ram Sethu
as interpreted by the Centre.

Ram bridges our history

The current controversy over Ram Setu presents an ideal opportunity to probe the
reality of a god whose human incarnation is central to Hindu faith. The deity
who inspired a footbridge wide enough for an army to cross the Palk Straits
poses a powerful challenge to historians who hold that India's first political
states were the 16 mahajanapadas that fought to control the Ganga valley in the
sixth-fifth centuries BCE. The kings of Kashi, Koshal, and the Vrijji
confederacy succumbed to Magadh under Bimbisar (c 543–491 BCE). Much later,
after Alexander's retreat, the Mauryan Empire (322–185 BCE) rose by deposing the
Nanda dynasty.

Can history accept that Koshal (which included Ayodhya) was an older kingdom;
that a prince banished after a palace coup could raise a formidable force and
cross an ocean to recover his abducted wife? Closely linked is the veracity of
Valmiki Ramayan as ‘itihas', not kavya; the existence of a temple in the

We don't go to sun to worship it, Swamy tells apex court

May 8, 2008

Vaishakh Shuddha Trutiya/Chatrurthi

New Delhi: The Supreme Court Wednesday had to contend with a blunt answer to its poser as to who goes to the Rama Sethu in the sea to worship it. "We all worship the sun. But we don't go to the sun to worship it," said former union minister Subramanian Swamy.

Speaking before the bench of Chief Justice K.G. Balakrishnan, Swamy passionately opposed the proposed construction of a shorter navigational sea route around the Indian peninsula if it involved the destruction of the Rama Sethu or Adam's Bridge.

The bench, which also included Justice R.V. Raveendran and Justice J.M. Panchal, wanted to know last week if anyone takes to the sea to reach the Rama Sethu to worship it if it indeed had religious value.


Syndicate content