Civil and Uncivil Societies Blog By Ratan Sharda
Civil and Uncivil Societies
I have been rather intrigued by the term 'Civil Society'. I had a long argument with a dear friend of mine, a leading light in this 'Civil Society' movement. By calling citizen activists (the right word, perhaps), as civil society, aren't we keeping out a large part of the society which is not 'civil' or rather which is 'uncivil' - probably with low education, low income, average life style, unaware of civilized society's obsession with brands etc. etc. My friend explained to me, it is not so but this is the universally accepted nomenclature for citizen activists. But, contrast between the media coverage and deep sighs of 'beautiful people' at a Baba running amok brought out the difference between perceived 'civil society' and our majority 'uncivil' society of 'average boring village and town and suburban dwellers.
Contrast the crowds that thronged media elevated Anna Hazare fest. Don't get me wrong. With all due respect to the veteran crusader, the crowds were not as big as what Baba Ramdev brought in across Bharat. But, media was so taken in by presence of English speaking 'beautiful people' in their designer clothes and with it attitude, just right for good news sound bites, that it helped create 'Brand Anna' as next only to Gandhi ji. I am not even suggesting that 'civil society' (as I read this tag) should not be on road. By all means, they must come out roads, they can provide the requisite leadership and come out with good ideas.
I know of wonderful work done by Anna and I respect him a lot. But, the point I am driving home is not about personalities of Anna or Baba. But, rather the way they are presented to us by news coverage because of the crowds they attract. The followers of Baba who came from all over Bharat were a study in contrast. Rustic villagers, small town residents, or coming from distant suburbs of Delhi or Mumbai etc. They are the worst sufferers from tyranny of bureaucracy at lower level in their daily dealings and have no where with alls to pay their way through their chicanery. They came on faith that Baba will fight the mighty corrupt and they came to support this. So, there is hardly any coverage of the participants of this agitation. They can't speak English, they dont come pretty on camera, so just keep camera on Baba - he makes colourful copy! Witness the way Baba Ramdev is harangued by media and the kid glove treatment Anna Hazare gets.
Now, you will understand why I am against the word 'civil society'.
Was this contrast in two societies of India i.e. Bharat that flummoxed media and powers that be? When Congress flexed its police muscles, it calculated that these ordinary folks will not get sympathy and colourful coverage from media and will go home tails between legs. It forgot that this is the common 'uncivil society' that votes with its feet and not the beautiful 'civil society'. Now, that shit has hit the fan, let us see this 'police state' mentality haunt them in coming months.
What I have noted above, does not at all take away the credit from media for standing up against corruption, giving live coverage to attack on innocent citizens in the dead of night. I am just pointing out the difference in approach to the two agitations. And making readers aware of this phenomenon of common man fight against corruption and civil society's fight against corruption. The gap between Bharat and India as cliche goes, and our elite society's perceptions.
- praful.nikam's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- 1402 reads
-










Comments
Civil Society Is Justified
Hello---I do agree to the fact that growth in India in last 60 odd years hasnt been inclusive but be careful while bashing the crowd gathered at Anna's anshan---they were no elite---they are the neo urban middle class---the elite are still unpurturbed in their ac rooms---what unique thing Anna did was to mobilise the urban masses whose anguish was more a sort of disgust expressed in closed door conversations till now...Anna brought them on road---afterall its I who pay taxes which constitutes the salary of PM --why shouldnt he answer my questions---media did no wrong in focussing on individuals --for individuals is what we are and thats how we all should be treated.
Do you really know the crowd gathered there was more of university students..doctors..engineers like myself thronging Anna?--we would never take to roads before---we came there because PM refused to respond....I am no elite and i hardly found any merc or bmw or audi there...What is becoming hard to digest for most of hypocrites is that the comparatively well offs are also taking to roads to protest for something they have always deserved but never got?people like you and me are the opinion shapers of society and if you or me got treated as individuals where is the harm?
Coming to swami Ramdev's anshan--i was never a part of it but came to know about the diffrence in crowd through times of india.Its hartening to see the rural brethren joining hands with swami ji and standing for the hard right against the easy wrong--no objections to it--they did perfectly fine but how many really understood the gravity of concern---it was more a matter of faith rather than facts and figures---i am careful not to offend any one but how many gathered there really understood what money is black money?Its the same people who also attend the gatherings of lalu yadav,sonia gandhi,and cpm.I dont condemn or criticize them and trust me i will till my last breath work to patch the divide between bharat and india...but what wrong do you find in media?It might be your perception but not fact..for sure.its graduating time for India---we have to take the next step----a new leap=====what you said is not irrelevent but its not the responsibility of Deepak chaurasia for sure.Its your responsibility --its my responsibility and its responsibility of everyone living in india to pull their bharatiya brethrean and handhold them and take them along---not that bharat is handicapped but it certainly is ailing..
Regards
Priyank Singh
world reports on our looted money stashed in swiss banks
» It has been reported that Indian Nationals have deposited $1456 billion or $ 1.45 trillion (Rs.65.52 lakh crore) in Swiss Banks which is more than the rest of the world put together (Swiss Banking Association Report, 2006).
» 45 crore Indians can receive Rs.100,000 each if this money is returned to India.
» Deposits of Indian nationals in Swiss Banks is nearly 7 times the total foreign debt of India which presently stands at $222 billion.
» With just about $1000 billion, India can have world class physical and social infrastructure and need not wait till the year 2020 to join the league of 'developed' nations!
» In March 2005, the Tax Justice Network (TJN) published a research finding demonstrating that $11.5 trillion of personal wealth was held offshore by rich individuals across the globe. The findings estimated that a large proportion of this wealth was managed from some 70 tax havens.
» It is estimated that one percent of the world's population holds more than 57 percent of total global wealth, routing it invariably through these tax havens.
» Details of illegal accounts in Liechtenstein's LGT Bank can be made available to the Indian authorities as the German authorities have the list of account holders and are willing to disclose the names but Government of India has not asked for the names!
» A Study by CMIE found that each parliamentary poll generates between $10.19 billion and $11.33 billion of black money
» India is ranked as one of the most corrupt nations in the world.
» India has slipped to 84th place in the Corruption Perception Index released by Transparency International on September 23, 2008 for the year 2008.
» Country loses nearly Rs. 2 lakh crore of revenue every year due to corruption in taxation departments.
» Nearly Rs. 32 thousand crore is paid every year as bribes to corrupt officers.
» Only 3 percent of the population is beneficiary of black economy.
» Percentage of black economy has grown from about 3 percent in the mid fifties to 7 percent in mid sixties to 20 percent by 1980-81, to around 35 percent by 1990-91 and 40 percent by 1994-95.
» According to one estimate, the public sector lost Rs. 30,000 crore through corruption in 1990-91. But for corruption, the rate of profit of the public sector would have been at least 30 percent and not the 5 percent as reported.
» If the size of the black economy was 40 percent of GDP in 1998-99, the loss of direct tax revenue at the prevailing rate of taxes would amount to at least Rs. 200,000 crore.
» Why has the size of black economy grown from around 10 percent in 1971, when the income tax rate was as high as 97.5 percent to the current size of at least 40 percent when the highest income tax rate is down to 30 percent?
» Finance Minister in his budget speech in 1993 made the statement that excise duty evasion may be of the order of 40 percent.
» Money kept abroad (in foreign exchange) by Indians was said to be at least $100 billion (nearly Rs.5 lakh crore) and is growing.
» In the Transparency International Bribe Payers Index 2006 released in October 2006, India is at the bottom with a score of just 4.62
» Indian companies are most susceptible to give bribes in order to secure export orders.
» Switzerland is ranked first for combating bribery in the TI Bribery Payers Index.
» More than $ 1 trillion (US $ 1,000 billion) is paid as bribes each year as per a report prepared by the World Bank Institute.
» 75 percent respondents in a Transparency India survey said corruption had increased in the last year.
» A UNDP report states that if corruption came down to Scandinavian levels, growth would jump 1.5 percent and Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) by 12 percent.
» 31 percent of food grains and 36 percent of sugar intended for distribution under the PDS find their way to the black market.
» An ILO Report published in 2005 states that bribes/deductions were made in 94.4 percent of the cases taken up under self-employment schemes in Uttar Pradesh.
» Bribes and deductions ranged from about 5 percent to 35 percent of the loan sanctioned in most cases.
» The average amount of bribes/deductions, which could be quantified in the ILO study, were Rs.4150 per loan.
» Beneficiaries receiving loans before 1990 paid Rs.2257 on average, while those receiving loans between 1990-1995 paid Rs.2947. Beneficiaries after 1995 paid Rs.5477 per loan.
» Enormous leakages, sometimes up to half or more of the public expenditure, run like a thread through all the anti-poverty programmes in Uttar Pradesh.
» Out of a total of 234 nominees who filed nominations from Congress, Shiromani Akali Dal and Bhartiya Janata Party in the Assembly elections to Punjab Legislative Assembly held in February 2007, 175 were crorepatis