Anti cultural. Apropos, the verdict given by Supreme court of India on premarital sex and live-in relationships is, to the core, ANTI CULTURAL, immoral and amoral.

“When two adult people
want to live together what is the offence. Does it amount to an offence? Living
together is not an offence. It cannot be an offence,” said a bench
comprising Chief Justice K G Balakrishnan, Justice Deepak Verma and Justice B S
Chauhan.

There are several aspects going into the matter before verdict would be given. Let us see another quote by the bench of judges. “Please tell us what is the offence and under which section. Living
together is a right to life,” remarked the court. apparently referring to
Article 21 of the Constitution relating to right to life and liberty. The apex
court further said the views expressed by Khushboo were personal.

Firstly, the case referred to here was not about the fundamental rights of citizens.It carried the weight of the moral values of the most ancient country of the World.

Secondly, the case was put for Trial in India and not in US or UK. In India, moral and the societal values prevails and precedes the Constitutional law, unlike in west where morality is ovetaken by individuality. So the case was not seen in Indian context.

Thirdly, the crux of the issue is that the jury has taken shelter in Indian mythology, to defend their verdict. This is what they had to say :

even Lord Krishna and Radha lived together.

Before interpreting the mythology to support their judgemental arguement, the RESPONSIBLE bench of judges should have consulted the experts on subject. Now the intellectual insanity of our LEARNED judges is out on roads.

Lord Krishna was 14 years old when he left Gokul and Radha was hardly 12. They both never met in their lives ever after. Such childlike friendship is being interpreted in an UnIndian way. Disgusting. The name of Radha doesn`t appear in the original text of BHAGAVATAM (STORY OF KRISHNA), it is said that her name appears in the later years literature of folklore.

Those who endorsed the Anti Indian phenomenon have their laughs, for none other than supreme court has validated the issue.

Probably the law is waiting for some houses to get disintegrated and a few hundred girls to elope it seems !! It is evident from their ferocious arguement “How many homes have been affected
can you tell us,” court asked while enquiring whether the complainants had
daughters. When the response was in the negative, they shot back, “Then,
how are you adversely affected”?

Ours is a society governed by values not by law. Indian law needs to be metamorphosised in consonance with the moral values of the country. Today, Indian values have received a nasty blow at the hands of its own law and protectors. Three cheers !!!