WHO MASTERMINDED CREATION OF PAKISTAN?....PART I




                          WHO MASTER MINDED CREATION OF PAKISTAN?....PART I

                                             Dr
K Prabhakar Rao

 

               Usually, late Mr. Mohammed Ali
Jinnah ( Qaid E Azamof Pakistan)
is considered as  the greatest villain
for creation of Pakistan
in 1947 that has permanently divided the sub continent  preceded by holocaust, mayhem,  murder, exodus of population, abductions,
rapes, burnings, hatred and lootings of properties ( 1). The actual happenings,
circumstances etc that finally resulted in creation of Pakistan are still shrouded in
mystery and many skeletons will roll out of the cupboards if these issues are
dug out dispassionately and revealed by the government..

 

                It is very well known that in
1857 first war of independence ( Sepoy mutiny as dubbed by the  Englishmen) Muslims and Hindus fought
shoulder to shoulder against the forces of East India
company. Muslim troops fought under the command of Hindu Generals and vice
versa. There was no single instance of division between the communities. There
was national spirit. There were no betrayals between communities. Famous
Maratha General Tantya tope was betrayed to East India
Company by his close associate Hindu friend. Ghulam Ghouse Khan the  chief of Jhansi artillery died of gun shot
with Rani Jhansi at he side during the seize of Jhansi. Muslim soldiers fought
and died for their Rani of Jhansi. Bahadur Shah II Zafar of Mughal dynasty who
was the nominal emperor at Delhi was proclaimed
as the Real emperor of Hindustan and this was
accepted by everyone and there was no disagreement on the issue. Sadly the   uprising failed as every one knows it. But it
shook the foundations of the Company and its rule was terminated and Hindustan was brought under the direct rule of the crown
(2).

            This
was the period when industrial revolution was already on the way and many
scientific discoveries were transforming the world into a modern era. The
American independence also had impact on world affairs. Under the rule of crown
in India   new reforms were brought in, education was
modernized (Although contested by Indians now) and freedom of expression became
a bit liberal. People became more vocal and more representations for natives
were demanded in all matters of governing. There was awakening on the whole in
the country. Modern education and its impact no doubt had its influence on the
people. The talk of Swaraj was more frequent and it was being realized that one
day the Englishmen had to go  from the
sub continent.  During this period Hindus
and Muslims were slowly attracted in  to
groups. Sir Syed ahmed khan emerged as 
an   intellectual during these
times. The  most important  seed of poison for separatism was infact  sown by Sir Syed Ahmed Khan ( 1817-1892) the much
glorified     founder of Aligarh Muslim university.  He is much glorified in India by
Muslims and pseudo secularists. He wrote ( 3):-

 

“UNDER A DEMOCRATIC SYSTEM OF
GOVT WHICH FORMS THE IDEAL OF THE CONGRESS LEADERS, THE LARGER COMMUNITY WOULD
FULLY OVERRIDE THE INTERESTS OF THE SMALLER COMMUNITY”.

 

       Thus Sir Syed
Ahmed khan expressed fears that in a democratic setup with Hindu majority based
on counting of heads meaning votes, Muslims would be dominated and probably
would never  attain political power. This
was enough to stir the Hornets nest.

          Poet Iqbal was the next Muslim
gentleman who suggested for formation of a Muslim State.
He was a lawyer and probably he did less of his profession and did more of  writing of poetry. In a 1930 lecture, Iqbal
suggested the creation of a separate state for the Muslims of India. Although
Iqbal died in 1938, nine years before the formation of Pakistan in 1947, it was his ideas that have
been the main force behind the creation of Pakistan (4).

 

                       Thus we see that    Sir
Syed Ahmed Khan was the first one to sow the seed of hatred between Hindus and
Muslims followed by Poet Iqbal in 1930 from which advantage was taken by the
cunning and clever Jinnah at a later date who poisoned the atmosphere.
In fact, the first two were the bigger
villains to put straight in this murky game of partition and probably Jinnah
deserves slightly lesser degree of condemnation than them. There is a saying
that a pen is more powerful than a sword. Even today it is true. The amount of
good or bad media in the form of a news paper can do today is known to one and  all.

                       It is very sad that
these two men who were infact the masterminds behind formation of Pakistan are
much glorified in India every day and it is a tragedy that  Indian army and other uniformed forces of
India unfortunately march to the tune of Iqbal’s song every day while he was
one of the masterminds for wrecking this country. In central schools this song
is much glorified. Netaji’s songs of INA are rather taboo in this country. That
is the part of much debated India’s
secularism (Pseudo?).

 

 

CONTINUED

 

---------------- Note: Content of this blog post is writer's personal opinion and may not be SanghParivar.org or Sangh's view.

Comments

Dr K Prabhakar Rao's picture

Dear friends, Many skeletons

Dear friends,

Many skeletons are hidden in cupboards

To know the truths is a taboo in india

The truths of our struggle are white washed

And the rotten versions are let loose by the media

Dr K Prabhakar Rao

RAJ DEPENDER SINGH RATHORE's picture

If we can get some

If we can get some historical evidence than we can put it to Hindustan.

Dr K Prabhakar Rao's picture

There is a need to

There is a need to completely and dispassionately investigate the citcumstances that resulted in division of this sub continent by an independent agency free of political leanings, hang ups, pressures and bias.this would settle all doubts to rest. but who will do that. Most of the papers are lying with the UK governmnet in their archives and and many with Indian govt and congress party. Who will bell the cat. This is a very touchy subject as many murky games played during the freedom struggle would probably be exposed that could tarnish images of some leaders beyond repairs who are glorified at present and treated as gods and icons. These issues are soft pedalled from time to time and white washed. Thanks to ineffectveness of us as a nation.
Dr K Prabhakar Rao

Dr K Prabhakar Rao's picture

Dear readers, Due to some

Dear readers,
Due to some difficulties on site the Part ii is posted in cocmments...

WHO MASTER MINDED CREATION OF PAKISTAN?...Part II

DR K Prabhakar Rao

In Hyderabad Sir Syed Ahmed Khan memorial lectures are being conducted regularly at Nampally at Sir Syed Ahmed Khan hall. Earlier Mir Osman Ali Khan Asif Jha, Nizam 7( former ruler of Hyderabad state) memorial lectures were conducted and after some objections and hue and cry, it was changed to the present one. It is well known to all that Nizam 7 abetted Razakars under Kasim Razvi and unleashed a wave of terror against Hindu population in the state with an intention of staying independent after 1947 and finally he was deposed by Police action in 1948 and the state became part of Hindustan. Probably it was agreed that these two were slightly of lesser culprits than the Nizam 7.
Nizam 7 although was good builder of buildings, Osmania university and few reservoirs like Osman sagar and Himayat sagar and thus had some credits in his own way ( He was also considered a poet in urdu in his own way and his poems were published in local urdu papers under Royal farman), he abetted Razakars and the crimes committed by them along with the rascal and Islamic fundamentalist Kasim Razvi ( He was jailed after police action and after release went to Pakistan where he died unsung and unheard) duly abetted by Deen yar Jung the police chief of Hyderabad. Some credit must be given to Nizam for his earlier good activities as a ruler. But this will not absolve him from the crimes committed by his Razakars and for his policies of inability against activities of Razakars where he abdicated his responsibilities towards his Hindu subjects. He wanted to remain independent as a ruler while Sir Khan and Iqbal were the master minds behind partition that was a bigger crime in fact than what Nizam did. Syed khan and Iqbal clearly divided the populations with strokes of their pen and shown the path and provided clues. Unfortunately these two men were accomplished men in their spheres of activities but they did not rise over the narrow outlook of Islam and intolerance towards Hindus. They had national outlook and much narrow minded in this respect. But those men died much earlier after doing the damage and poisoning the minds of Muslims in India. Gandhi’s slogan Hindu Muslim Bhai..Bhai just vanished into thin air inspite of his loud chest beating and singing Ramdhun at pitch of the voice everywhere and every time once the call for separation was given.

Then comes the role of Mohammed Ali Jinnah in this murky affair of partition who did practical implementation of the plan of the earlier men. Rest is history. Some might say that the Englishmen clearly took advantage of these divisions and played their murky cards. Finally the Muslim league inspired mayhem, murders and arson resulted in partition of this subcontinent and is attributed by some quarters to the prevailing situation. The fact is that the situation developed out of clear thoughts of division by Syed khan and Iqbal who rather escaped criticism and are rather considered holy cows. Thanks to pseudo secularists.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

1.Dr K Prabhakar Rao, Washing dirty linen in public,on kuntamukkalaprabhakar.blogspot.com , December24, 2009, 03:49 and also on sanghparivar.org, December 26, 2009, 2:06

2.The first war of independence, http://www.indhistory.com/1857-war-of-independance.html

3 . Majumdar, RC Roy Chaudhry, Kalikinkar datta,Advanced history of India, St Martins press, New York, edition III, 1967, PP 893

4..Mohad Iqbal, http://74.125.153.132/search?q=cache:ZxpPbh5j3bEJ:www.whereincity.com/in...