Moily never misses opportunity to pick up a brownee here or there as part of his strategy for endearment among minority community and the alien political dynasty of the Congress party. Last time Moily said that Modi would have been hanged if he were in any other country. This time he says Modi would be in serious trouble. There is no wisdom in his assumption that senior elected officials, regardless of party affiliation would order murder. Would Moily ever utter a word against a non Hindu for attack on Hindu crowds in West Bengal, Maharashtra, Kerala, or in any other state? What are his view on the Marad conspiracy and mass killing of fishermen in a village in Kerala? What are his views on the attack on the priests who were conducting yagna in West Bengal by a Muslim crowd ten times the size of the Hindus present? How, as the Law Minister he would fight against obstruction of justice by religious leaders when they order killing of people and defy law enforcement agencies? What would Moily do to expedite the conclusion of Sr. Abhaya case investigation? What are his views about the Pakistani resoluteness against cooperating with Indian authorities in solving Pakistani militant training and infiltration of militants in India? What are his thoughts about new legislation to prevent frequent home grown terrorist activities?

One would expect the Chairman of Administrative Reforms Commisson to grow up from being a political toddler who is consumed by his devotion to party leadership for career advancement to being a Law Minister who foresees the need for legislation to keep up with advanced tactics used by corrupt political leaders to loot the country? What are his strategies to meet social transformation? What are his thoughts about the growing violent tendency among minority to transform the Indian society? I expected that the one, who translated Holy Ramayana into Kannada, would display erudition and originality, but I don’t see those qualities in him. Instead, I see a Law Minister who would do the same mistakes made by his predecessor, who had had an opportunity to realize that he had wronged and have been replaced as he might not repeat his mistakes