The Hindu-hating Congress party
In the current Election Scenario, the message below says it all. Please bring a Party that works for Bharat and its True citizens.
----------------
Note: Content of this blog post is writer's personal opinion and may not be SanghParivar.org or Sangh's view.
Please pass it on to your contacts, particularly in India.
The Hindu-hating Congress party, as it became known as, is another example of this wrong direction of intent and disposition. Naturally, they want to be perceived as lovers of India and its people, but its very foundation when it was formed in December of 1885 shows otherwise. With the aim to “Allow all those who work for the national good to meet each other personally, to discuss and decide of the political operations to start during the year”, and with Englishman A. O. Hume laying its foundation to work for the British interests, shows its true purpose at the time. The pre-independence leaders of this party were but Indians who had been Western educated, anglicized, with the British Labor form of socialism as their ideal. Thus, they were really meant to operate as the go-between layer of bureaucracy for the British to the Indian masses. In this way, they were a Westernized elite, separate from the Indian culture.
Therefore, the British favored the Congress party as a means to continue its occupation of India . And because the Congress “moderates” had a mindset that worked along the same lines as their British masters, they became even greater Hindu haters than the British, the attitude of which has filtered down through its generations until today. This operation continued through the 19th century, but then changed in order to acquire some laws from the British that were favorable to India as the Congress began to realize how it had been played foolishly into submission for the British cause. Nonetheless, the general “moderate” attitude and distancing from the Vedic roots of India in the Congress Party has continued to this day.
- rkm's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- 649 reads
-









