WHAT PRECISELY DESTROYED 'SONE KI CHIRIYA' ???

CERTAINLY A WEAKENED, DEGRADED HINDU SOCIETY, BEREFT OF 'DHARMA', EXTENDED AN OPEN INVITATION TO THE PLUNDERERS / MARAUDERS FROM ALL OVER THE WORLD. THE QUESTION THAT AGONISES SO MANY HAS BEEN, HOW DID / WHY DID HINDU SOCIETY DEGRADE ITSELF FOR NOTHING AT THE DAWN OF MEDIEVAL BHARATVARSHA.

VARNA SYSTEM HAD BEEN GOING STRONG EARLIER WITH DESPARATE ATTEMPTS BY THE ANTI-HINDU ELEMENTS INCLUDING INTRUDERS ( MAINLY BRITISHERS ) TO IMPOSE CASTEISM UPON HINDUs IN AN ORGANISED MANNER WITH THE FORCE OF PHYSICAL MIGHT. FOUR 'VARNAs' SUBSEQUENTLY BEGAN PLAYING THEIR ROLES IN A DUBIOUS INSTEAD OF SACROSANCT MANNER, HURTLING TOWARDS ALL-ROUND DECADENCE AND DILUTION OF 'DHARMA'.
BRAHMANs WERE THE PATHETIC VICTIMS OF SNOBBERY, ARROGANCE, JEALOUSY, EXCLUSIVITY, HIMALAYAN EGOISM, VOLATILE TEMPERAMENT, GREED AND EXPECTING ALL OTHERS TO PROSTRATE BEFORE THEM. THUS, THEY ANTAGONISED ALL AND SUNDRY INSTEAD OF REMAINING A POLE OF STRENGTHJoin RSS : Build Nation AND GUIDANCE FOR ALL OTHERS. GENERAL IMPRESSION STILL GOES AROUND THAT BRAHMAN CANNOT TALK POLITELY / SWEETLY TO ANYONE. MURLI MANOHAR JOSHI OF BJP IS A CLASSICAL EXAMPLE IN THIS REGARD. I PERSONALLY KNOW BRAHMAN ADVOCATES SCOLDING THEIR OWN CLIENTS RIGHT IN COURTROOMS, BRAHMAN PUNDITs FIRING THEIR OWN 'YAJMAAN'...I AM YET TO FIND A TAMIL BRAHMAN WHETHER IYER OR IYENGER, WHO TALKS TO HIS SERVANTS / POOR DALITS AFFECTIONATELY / POLITELY EVEN AFTER BEING HOUNDED OUT OF TAMIL NADU, SIMILAR IS THE TALE OF KASHMIRI PUNDITs KNOWN FOR ARROGANCE AND SNOBBERY...THERE IS ANOTHER STRANGE PHENOMENON I HAVE BEEN OBSERVING PARTICULARLY IN BRAHMAN FAMILIES OF LATE...DAUGHTERS ARE BEING PAMPERED INTO HAUGHTINESS / SNOBBERY / LOSE TEMPERAMENT / RUDE & SNAPPISH BEHAVIOUR / DISOBEDIENCE WHILE BRAHMAN BOYS ARE BEING BULLIED INTO DOCILITY AND SUBMISSIVENESS BY THEIR OWN PARENTS !!! CONSEQUENCES ARE CERTAINLY GOING TO BE HORRIBLE AFTER SOME TIME. THEN THESE SO CALLED 'Hi-Fi' YOUNG & OLD LADIES CONSTANTLY GRUMBLE 'MEN HAVE NOT CHANGED AT ALL WHILE WE, WOMEN HAVE ADVANCED A LOT' !!! VERY STRANGE AND ABSURD INDEED. THE PROBLEM HAS ATTAINED MENACING PROPORTIONS, SO MUCH SO THAT PROBABLY I AM ON THE VERGE OF ADVISING BRAHMAN BOYS NOT TO MARRY BRAHMAN DAMSELS AT ALL !!!
RAJPUTs / KSATRIYAs DESTROYED THEMSELVES THROUGH 'TAWAAYAF-PUJA', MUJRA-CULTURE, TREACHERY OF ALL SORTS AND ALL OTHER FORMS OF EXTRAVAGANCE. TRAGEDY WITH THEM WAS THAT THEY HAD TOO MANY 'RAJA' MAN SINGHs WHILE SO FEW MAHARANA PRATAPs. GENERAL IMPRESSION AMONG THE MASSES THAT RAJPUTs HAVE NOT BEEN LOYAL TO PEOPLE / THEIR KINGDOMS IS NOT ENTIRELY UNFOUNDED. Ex-PRIME MINISTER V.P. SINGH WAS A MONUMENTAL EXAMPLE OF SOME OF THESE DESTRUCTIVE TRAITS. I HOLD HIM AS THE WORST DESTROYER OF HINDU SOCIETY IN THE CONTEMPORARY ERA.
VAISHYAs & OBCs CONTRIBUTED TO THE DEGRADATION OF HINDU SOCIETY THROUGH THEIR EXPLOITATIVE CROOKEDNESS AND INHUMAN CONDUCT PARTICULARLY TOWARDS POORS / DALITS / HAPLESS ONES. WHILE 'SAHUKAARs' SUCKED BLOOD OF POOR, INNOCENT ONES, OBCs / ZAMINDARs WERE THE WORST TORMENTERS OF THE UNFORTUNATE ONES. THEIR OPPRESSIVE SPREE CONTINUES EVEN TODAY IN REMOTE VILLAGES / FAR FLUNG AREAS.
DALITs & SHUDRAs RUINED THEMSELVES BY NOT REVOLTING AGAINST HIGH-HANDEDNESS OF THE SO-CALLED UPPER CASTES. OWING TO THEIR DOCILITY, INNOCENCE AND SUBSERVIENCE, THEY TURNED OUT TO BE THE WORST SUFFERERS OUT OF ALL. THAT TOO, THE SILENT ONES. ONLY IF THEY HAD REVOLTED IN THE BEGINING ITSELF, CONTOURS OF HINDU SOCIETY WOULD HAVE BEEN ALTOGETHER DIFFERENT TODAY. THEY ARE THE ONES WHO DESERVE MAXIMUM AFFIRMATIVE ACTIONS / SUPPORT / SYMPATHY FROM ALL QUARTERS MINUS RESERVATION. RESERVATION IS A VENOMOUS DESTROYER OF HUMAN POTENTIAL. OUR ANTI-NATIONAL LEADERS HAVE CONTINUED DESTROYING THEM BY OFFERING SOPS OF RESERVATIONS.
 
IT WAS A DEADLY COCKTAIL OF VANITIES THAT BROUGHT DOWN HINDUs PRECIPITOUSLY, RENDERED THEM SUSCEPTIBLE TO FOREIGN DOMINATION.
 
ENTIRE SCENARIO CAME TO SUCH A DEPLORABLE STATE OF AFFAIRS THAT WE INVITED A REPREHENSIBLE REMARK FROM A FELONIOUS, CELEBRITY BRITISH SCOUNDREL, 'SIR' WINSTON CHURCHILL TO THE EFFECT THAT WE HINDUs DID NOT DESERVE FREEDOM AT ALL !! WAY BACK IN 1946-47.
NEXT GOLDEN OPPORTUNITY TO REVOLUTIONISE HINDU SOCIETY WAS WASTED BY THE FIRST PRIME MINISTER NEHRU WHEN HE FAILED TO ORDER FREE AND COMPULSORY GIRL'S / WOMEN'S EDUCATION THROUGHOUT THE NATION WAY BACK IN 1947 ITSELF THOUGH HE HAD UNDERSTOOD IT'S FAR REACHING IMPORT DURING HIS 'DISCOVERY OF INDIA'. I DO NOT UNDERSTAND WHY HE IS CALLED A VISIONARY BY HIS DESCENDANTS AND OTHER BOOT-LICKERS AND WHY HE REFUSED TO UNDERSTAND WHATEVER HE DISCOVERED ABOUT INDIA.
I SUPPOSE, THESE WERE THE FUNDAMENTAL, CONSPICUOUS 'PILLAR-REASONS / FACTORS' FOR THE ROT THAT SET IN DURING MEDIEVAL PERIOD. THERE MAY BE SEVERAL OTHER REASONS / FACTORS ALBEIT OFFSHOOTS OF THESE.
I WOULD LOVE TO BE CONTRADICTED / PROVED WRONG ON ANY OF THESE POINTS BY ANYONE WITH FACTS AND FIGURES.
 
VANDE MAATARAM I
 
RAMAKANT TIWARI 
   

Average: 2.3 (3 votes)
---------------- Note: Content of this blog post is writer's personal opinion and may not be SanghParivar.org or Sangh's view.
Dr K Prabhakar Rao's picture

True.Nehru i s not the focus

True.Nehru i s not the focus of the post.The theme of the post is who destroyed sone ki chidia. Before Nehru there were manywho contributed to destruction as you discussed. Nehru played his part after independence during his 16 yeras long rule by his pseudo statesmanship and lopsided policies.Whatever was left in Soneki chidia was further destroyed and a legacy of destruction has been set up and it continues even today. So Nehru also is a part of this discussion. In contemporary history Nehru has been given an important place by our pseudo historians. His failures are set aside and whatever little was done are glorified.unfortunately the dynastic slavery in india contributed to this tragedy.Nehru as cog in this wheel of destruction of one ki Chidia can not escape blame. His contribution to this destruction is of importance.
Dr K Prabhakar Rao

sarvasankalpasannyasi's picture

I AM A BIT SURPRISED BY THE

I AM A BIT SURPRISED BY THE REACTIONS. NEHRU IS NOT THE FOCUS OF THIS POST. HE HAD ALWAYS BEEN AN UNNECESSARY APPENDAGE TO OUR HISTORY / SOCIETY. FOCUS OF THE POST IS ENTIRELY DIFFERENT.

kishan_chowbene's picture

NEHRU, this names sends

NEHRU, this names sends shivers within me... He was a NRI and educated in England. He was a playboy and had many grilfriends!! The English who destroyed Indian Education System chose him to take over India as they wanted an Indian with British mentality to rule us... and this has continued. We now have Sonia an Italian. Nehru was enjoying his life with Lady Mountbatten during Freedom Struggle - it clearly depicts his nature and his mind... Is it not unfortunate that he was our PM!!

Kishan

Dr K Prabhakar Rao's picture

Nehru was never a visionery

Nehru was never a visionery although aclaimed by his stooges and bootlickers as you stated. He happily goofed up many things after he became PM. Kashmir is the classical example. if he was visionery he would not have refered the matter to UNO an useless set up. Next was his cock eyed Hindi Chini Bhai Bhai affair. It resulted in shmeful defeat of Indian army and butchering of our forces on Himlayan front devoid of even rifle ammunition and severe loss of reputation of the nation.Although India won Pak wars later, the shame of defaet at the hands of China stares squarely in the face of India army every time and always. Will they be ever able to get back their lost honour at the hands of Chiese PLA? Nehru was squarely responsible for this episode.He should have resigned immediately. But chose to find scape goats such as Menon and Gen Kaul and continued as the PM.Power was more important. However he died soon within two years of the national shame.People say he was a broken man. God knows it. Even Mundra affair exposed by his son in law Feroze Gandhi occurred during his time. It was the begining of the great murky scams in India by top echelons. None has been sent to gallows til date although many scams have been exposed. All escaped. Even his book Discovery of India although much acclaimed by the bootlickers is highly debatable. He gave a clean chit to the saddist, rapist and plunderer Mohd Ghaznavi whom he should have condemned. This is nothing than false secularism and appeasement of minorty community to gain popularity that continues till today: his legacy.India has been brought to this shameful phase by our own people.None else. Remember the famous song.......

Sambhal ke rahna apne ghar me chupe hue gaddaron se..

Saari basthi jal jaatee hai mutti bhar Angaronse

Sambhal ke rahna apne gharme chupe hue gaddaron se..

Dr K Prabhakar Rao

sarvasankalpasannyasi's picture

NEHRU WAS ESSENTIALLY A

NEHRU WAS ESSENTIALLY A MOGHUL KING IN THE GARB OF KASHMIRI PUNDIT.

Syndicate content