Get Updates
User login
Navigation
Poll
Invite a friend
Recent Blogs
- SYSTEMATIC EFFORTS ARE ON WAY TO DISTORT HISTORY BY MODERN REAL JAICHANDS
- PREGNANT DUCK
- there shud be law, when one converted to other religion- no more previous surname !
- ISLAMIZATION WILL BE STOPPED
- INTO THE PAST WITH PAIN...267
- THICK HIDES
- Abhishek Manu Singhvi Sex CD Scandal - there is no news in media but why opposition(mainly BJP) is silent !?
- BLAME GAME.. IT IS A PAST TIME
- BLUNTED EDGE
- DARK DAYS AHEAD
News Digest
another big blunder by pseudo secular, BJP stalwart Mr. Jaswant singh which may ruin now BJP totally!
another big blunder committed by BJP stalwart Mr.Jaswant singh by giving the clean chit to Md. Ali Jinnah and muslim community for india’s partition in his writing book on biography of Md. Ali Jinnah!
Mr. Jaswant singh also declared that muslim is peaceful community as he, being rajput co-existed with muslim in jaisalmir! why appeasement? don’t u see the picture of present
rajput is known self deterant & warrior group in hindu community! may be due to this, muslims r not still creating problem with them! can u justify the same with rest of india?
muslims r good or bad, we have got enough evidence from history and present happening, then why pseudoism?
by birth, nobody is bad! by birth, everybody is hindu, until he is circumcised or baptized !
the hatred , intolerance r filled by then to the tiny mind by their holy book verses of quaran and bible towards non-muslims , mainly against hindus! in which it teaches 'hindus r the illegal occupier of earth, so either they shud be killed or converted or penalized with jaziya for keeping their belief(quaran) and preaches 'hindus r the sinner, so either they shud be killed or converted'(bible)!
whether, Jinnah was responsible for partition or not, but those who were responsible including Jinnah, i give them full credit to have it! and for this act only, Hinduism in
think, we can not even now control
think what wud have been happened if the whole
yes, there was casualty but it was unavoidable, partition was unavoidable, if not that day, to-day there wud have been thousand time more slaughtering and probably u wud not have been alive to talk now ! respect the sacrifice of the millions of
hindus at that time were angry on Gandhiji not for partition but for not letting full muslim to go to Pakistan(which was sole purpose for creation of Pakistan in two nation or two religion theory) for which now we r struggling for our existence on India itself!
"hindu does not want space! " that was all the indirect absract of writing of pseudo secular Mr. Jaswant singh in ‘biography of Md. ali jinnah’!
if, hindus do not want separate space and make themselves always pseudo secular, then why innocent other hindus will give life in hands of muslim tenets which speaks for zero tolerance towards non-believer of Allaha, for mainly hindus!
in fact, the truth is whenever muslim will gain sizeable quantity by breeding like mosquetos, they need a space for themselves by implementing their islamic law and declaring islamic state and implementing jaziya on non-muslim (mainly hindu community) whoever not yet killed or converted!
i can clearly foresee that there will be atleast two partition of india further in near future! can u obstruct it? then, who will be responsible for further partition? is it only one man ,can u point? no, partition is always done for meeting the demand of whole community of any particular area!yes, someone will definitely lead the movement! one can not just go and tell for partition!Jinnah had done it as he felt the requirement!
why u r digging the earlier partion, the dead issue and giving someone clean chit? the increasing intolerance towards hindus by muslim & christians, conversions r clearly indicating for at least two separate country by parting india further for muslim & christian will be demanded in near future! or, u see the partition is done automatically as the whole hindu community will be converted! have u done something to obstruct 'mughalistan'? then, why hue and crue? why u do not find the problem with muslim and christians itself? u r aged, then also, how u have not got any experience such with muslims? how it is? r u staying in india at all? so, if i do not call u pseudo secular, then what i shud term u? other terms r already being poured for u, i am not detailing those!
- Forums:
Yesterday sudarshanji told
Yesterday sudarshanji told that jinnah was a secular and committed to undivided country at once.
Same sudharshanji asked Advaniji to step down in 2005. According to his interview later advani gave explanation to him and he convinced.
What is happening?.
I appreciate boldness of BJP
I appreciate boldness of BJP Party to dismiss Shri Jaswant Sing from the Party. He deserved it fully He can have his views about Jinah, Nehru, Sardar Patel and Mahatma Gandhi. He had no business to publish this debatable book at this very wrong juncture. He wanted some publicity by creating controversies and gain some popularity and money. Since removed, he can start his own party with Shri Kulkarni and others with Jinah as “Prerana Sthan”. He made immature statements after his removal.
the leaders in bjp have
the leaders in bjp have become selfish. how can jaswant say prachark became suvithaboki.he doesent know shangh.the dirty leaders sidelined swyamswveaks .
they have forget the scarfice of swyamsevakes who giving their blood to buld up the party.now shangh should foucs ourself and make our orgnization much stronger.we dont want bjp they made us fools.they forget their aim.we should all stand by param pujaniya sarsanghchalk and make our shangh stronger
'crticising nehuru not to
'crticising nehuru not to the extent of praising Jinnah'
...........................................................................................................
there is say 'ur action will speak louder than what u say'!
probably, all BJP leader has forgotten this and they r after what Jinnah has told about secularism! but the truth is what was his action! and history tells us his action was fanatic! he created Muslim league what advocates only for creation of pakistan, one line of his "we will do what is required" had made the riot between muslim & hindu where thousands hindus were butchered in calcutta & noakhali! and moreover, the biggest truth is, if not jinnah, then some other wud advocate for creation of pakistan as muslims r in character r like this! when they become majority in particular region, they create autonomous area for them and non-muslims r then bound to leave those area on fear! so, whatever be it, we can not praise jinnah because at the first instance, if there was fear of dividing of india by jawaharlal, then for the sake of so called secularism(as all BJP leader saw in him), why he did not abstain himself from so called forced to demand of pakistan?
There were many failures on part of Jawaharlal Nehru which brought sorrows to India. Like Tibbet, China, Kashmir, his Pseudo Secular policy, there are many actions and his thought which brought India sorrows.
But while criticising Nehru one must have in mind that it may not go beyond to such an extent which sound or give an impression of praising Jinnah.
If for a moment we accept that theory that Nehru forced Jinnah to demand for Pakistan even then the blame of Partition falls on Jinnah & he is responsible for mass riots before & after partition.
Jaswant singh advancing the same theory that today a terrorist having AK 47 is being forced to become terrorists by America or anti Islamists. Whatever reason it may be if you have AK 47 & you become Jihadi & started killing other sects in the name of Islam you have become terrorists.
So the failures of Nehru can be criticised delinking with praising Jinnah.
Jinnah's evaluation has to be done on his act that is what he did & it's consequences & not to be extracted from what was in his mind.
@swastik: "CONGRESS PARTY
@swastik:
"CONGRESS PARTY HIRED GOONS AND STAGED THE RAPE OF SWEDISH DIPLOMATS, AND THUS THE CONGRESS PARTY WON THE DELHI ELECTIONS."
-on the highlight of the above, can we not come to the conclusion that we bash ourselves or not, congress can do such act again!
-why BJP is not doing such act in congress ruled state to come to power!
-ur other comments r o.k. but ur obstruction to criticism of jaswant is wrong as it was required when some wrong is done by somebody! closing the eye and keep away from criticism is not a bliss! ur such act will not be spared by the rival to finish u! rather, if we can amend our mistake by criticising , it is good for the party as after a massive criticism, jaswant is out of the party and this was good for the party! a right decision for all time!
I APPEAL TO ALL TO STOP
I APPEAL TO ALL TO STOP JASWANT BASHING AND BJP BASHING, IT WOULD LEAD US NOWHERE AND IT WOULD STRENGTHEN CONGRESS, LET ME GIVE U ONE EXAMPLE, HOW BJP LOST POWER IN DELHI STATE ELECTIONS WHEN IT WAS IN POWER AT THE CENTRE.
THE CONGRESS PARTY HIRED GOONS AND STAGED THE RAPE OF SWEDISH DIPLOMATS, AND THUS THE CONGRESS PARTY WON THE DELHI ELECTIONS.
THIS IS GOING TO LEAD US NOWHERE, IN MY OPINION THE BJP SHOULD DO AS FOLLOWS IF AT ALL IT HAS TO COME TO POWER:
1.IT SHOULD HAVE VOCIFOROUS YOUTH BRIGADE WHICH SHOULD BE ABLE SHED BLOOD FOR THE SAKE OF HONOUR OF THE PARTY(BLOOD AND HONOUR).
2.BJP SHOULD INCULCATE THE SPIRIT OF NATIONALISM IN INDIAN PUBLIC.
3.BJP SHOULD EXPLAIN TO THE INDIAN PUBLIC THAT ALL THE SMALLER PARTIES ARE AN EXTENSION OF THE CONGRESS PARTY.
4.BJP SHOULD GO IT ALONE THROUGH OUT INDIA AND STRENGTHEN ITSELF AND NOT THE NDA.
LET ME TELL YOU JINNAH USED
LET ME TELL YOU JINNAH USED TO EAT PORK, FOR HIM RELIGION WAS A HANDLE TO GAIN POWER, HE WANTED TO BE THE PRIME MINISTER OF UNITED INDIA, WHEREAS NEHRU WHO WAS A STAUNCH MUSLIM WITH AN ASSUMED NAME OF NEHRU WANTED TO BECOME THE PRIME MINISTER OF INDIA MAYBE TRUNCATED, OR AT ANY OTHER COST, IT IS UP TO THE INDIAN PUBLIC TO DECIDE WHO IS THE BIGGER CULPRIT WETHER IT WAS PORK EATING JINNAH OR STAUNCH MUSLIM NEHRU. NEHRU WAS A DESCENDENT OF GHIASUDIN GHAZI THE LAST KOTWAL OF DELHI, THE NEHRU GANDHI FAMILY ARE ALL MUSLIMS , THE FATHER OF RAJEEV GANDH IS FEROZE KHAN AND THE FATHER OF SANJAY GANDHI IS YOUNIS KHAN. MDKC GANDHI WAS ABLE TO FOOL THE INDIAN PUBLIC BY ADOPTING MAIMUNA BEGUM AND FEROZE KHAN WITH AN AFFIDAVIT.SONIA'S REAL NAME IS EDVIGE ANTONIA ALBINA MAINO AND SHE IS FORMER KGB/CIA SPY. RAJEEV GANDHI CONVERTED TO CHRISTIANITY AND BECAME ROBERTO AND HE HAD TWO CHILDREN RAUL AND BIANCA.
well done BJP for discarding
well done BJP for discarding urself from Jaswant singh’s ‘JInnah praise’ book and expelling him from the party!
......................
in my own context : what BJP tried to convey the message to indian by expelling JASWANT SINGH is :Criticise nehuru for his role before & after partition(where he restricted remaining msulim to go to pakistan) but don't praise jinnah
…………………………………………
If Mr. Jaswant Singh does not understand why he has no place in BJP after writing such nonsense, he lacks basic common sense. In the first place, what he wrote was factually incorrect. Jinnah’s speeches divided people in India and incited a section of the Indian society. Just by saying “we shall do what is required,” hundreds of people in Calcutta were murdered over night. His concept of secularism is suppression of Hindu hopes and aspiration and preservation of people of his faith until they become powerful enough to massacre Hindus again as they did before the British occupation. His vision was to take care of hindus , which is guarding them by implementing Jaziya or converting in muslim sovereignty but not at all on secular view what we see in democratic India!
Jinnah wanted partition by force and genocide likes of calcutta and Naokhali was to terrorise the Congress representatives to concede the demand of Islamic Sovereignty. British , for their own reasons, wanted to see Pakistan carved out of the Subcontinent.
.................................
There were many failures on part of Jawaharlal Nehru which brought sorrows to India. Like Tibbet, China, Kashmir, his Pseudo Secular policy, there are many actions and his thought which brought India sorrows.
But while criticising Nehru one must have in mind that it may not go beyond to such an extent which sound or give an impression of praising Jinnah.
If for a moment we accept that theory that Nehru forced Jinnah to demand for Pakistan even then the blame of Partition falls on Jinnah & he is responsible for mass riots before & after partition.
Jaswant singh advancing the same theory that today a terrorist having AK 47 is being forced to become terrorists by America or anti Islamists. Whatever reason it may be if you have AK 47 & you become Jihadi & started killing other sects in the name of Islam you have become terrorists.
So the failures of Nehru can be criticised delinking with praising Jinnah.
Jinnah's evaluation has to be done on his act that is what he did & it's consequences & not to be extracted from what was in his mind.
pseudo, anti-hindu jaswant
pseudo, anti-hindu jaswant has seen muslim pain what they got in partition but has he not seen hindu pain what they got from partition where millions of hindus were slaughtered and after partition, hindus were in pakistan 25%, and in bangladesh 27%, now they 1% & 3% respectively! where r the missing hindus? on the contrary, in india, muslims were hardly 5%, now they r more than 20%!
what does it mean? how these happen? can pseudo anti-hindu jaswant singh understand?
i have already discarded
i have already discarded BJP. they are useless. they are just another carbon copy of congress. we have to look for alternatives
please don't tell B.J.P is
please don't tell B.J.P is useless.FOR US THERE IS NO ANOTHER choice.If we reject B.J.P it is help full to the antinationalists,terrorists and missioneries.As a big national party there is some problem.But wait, it will be ok. our nation wants that.
It is naïve, absurd and
It is naïve, absurd and preposterous! BJP should dump him.
Jaswant Singh holds senior position in BJP hierarchy. He had held important government position in the past. One expects such leaders to focus on contemporary and emerging issues, challenges, analysis and recommendations on ways and means to meeting those challenges. Indian society as well as the mankind has innumerable socio-economic, environmental and technical problems besides those created by politicians. Under such circumstances, leaders must have imagination and foresight to take their followers through right path.
Bemoaning of Akahnda Bharat, talk about Jinnah being a great secular leader etc. are utter nonsense. That part of the Indian real estate which was separated from India sixty years ago is now called Pakistan and is a sovereign nation. There is no similarity between that nation and ours. More than 25% of the population of that region had similar belief, culture and way of life to that of ours. However, most of them have been either massacred, their property robbed, or driven away. !% or 2% which remain now are harassed, murdered and converted every day. What we need to do is to focus on protecting our faith, culture, property and our families from people who are determined to massacre us, rob us of our hard earned wealth, violate our families, our value systems, convert and enslave us as was done in the last thousand years. Indian government is on a mission to hide historic evidence of what happened in the last thousand years. The millions of people massacred, the millions converted, the hundreds of places of worship destroyed and converted into mosque are waning from our memory. Our children would never know that our past contained such painful experiences.
The pampering and appeasement of our government has emboldened the minority community in India. They are not only waiting for the opportunity to massacre us, but they are already at war with us. I don’t deny that there are a few people of Islamic faith in India who believe in human brotherhood. In fact there are a few BJP leaders of Islamic faith. They are good people and I salute them, but the majority of those people do not think that way. Anyone who reads the following statements of various leaders would know what fait awaits the majority community in India within the next fifty years:
“A country like India, which has once been under Mohammedan rule, must never be given up, and it was incumbent on them to strive to regain their lost control.” “Against the non-Muslim Government, Islam prescribes only sword, protracted battle and the cutting of throats.” Moulana Abdul Kalam Azad
“The Muslim is a born fighter. He may hesitate to cast a vote for Pakistan, but he would not hesitate to shed his blood.” Liaqat Ali Khan
The havoc, that the Muslims would play, would put to shame what Changez Khan and Halaku did.” Feroz Khan Noon
If Mohammed-Bin-Kasim and Mahmood Ghaznavi could invade India with armies composed of a few thousands, and yet were able to overpower lakhs of Hindus, God willing a few lakhs of Muslims will yet overwhelm crores of Hindus.” Ghaznafar Ali Khan
“Nationalism is incompatible with Islam... The concept of a ‘nationalist Muslim’ is as absurd as that of a ‘religious Communist’ or ‘capitalist Marxist’. ..... When the ideology of Islam expands, nationalism is destroyed, and when nationalism grows, Islam is annihilated.” Dr. Ali Mohammed Naqvi
“There is not an inch of the soil of India which our forefathers did not once purchase with their blood. We cannot be false to the blood of our fathers. India, the whole of it, is therefore our heritage, and it must be reconquered for Islam.... Our ultimate ideal should be the unification of India, spiritually as well as politically under the banner of Islam. The final political salvation of India is not otherwise possible.” F.K. Khan Durrani
‘I am first a Muslim and then an Indian. Islam does not need the support of anyone for its spread. It is spreading on its own. At the time of partition, there were only four and a half crore Muslims in the country. However, in spite of the bloody communal riots in Bhiwandi, Moradabad, Aligarh and other areas, killing thousands of Muslims, the population of Muslims has increased to 14 crores, .....As for the question of conversion of all to Islam, it is the fundamental duty of a Muslim to strive for conversion and any Muslim who does not remember this duty, does not deserve to be called a Muslim.” Attaullah Suhrawardy
“The politics of socialism and secularism is totally unsound. I do not like any Muslim to adopt socialsim and secularism as his political ideal.” Syed Ali Shah Geelani
The Muslim community of India also welcomed the idea of a secular state, because they feared the alternative would be a Hindu State. Many of them seem to believe that the state must remain secular, but the Muslims should be saved from secularism.” Dr. Mushir-ul-Haq
Shall the Muslims with all their ideology merge into sweeping current of secularism or change the current itself and establish the sovreignty of Islam? That is the serious question which confronts the Mussalmans of India today. Islam has been born to turn the whole world into Islamic. We have to change this secular rule in Bharat and establish Islamic rule in its place. The idea of secular rule is itself a contradiction of Islam. We have, therefore, to slowly work for the establishment of the sovereignty of Islam here.” Syed Ahmad Hussain
“Muslims should have ruled India after the departure of the British, and not the Hindus. Population growth helped Muslims to annex a large part of India for creating a separate Islamic State of Pakistan. Such efforts on the part of the Muslims should be continued to gradually convert the rest of India a into Dar-ul-Islam (land of the Muslims).” Syed Abdullah Bukhari
“Is this our motherland? This is a blood-thirsty mother. This is not mother, this is a witch.” - Azam Khan
“There should be a separate Muslim state within each state of India.” Salahuddin Oweisi
Frequent violence in crowded places, in public transportation, cross border infiltration, etc. is only tips of the iceberg. A massive insurgency is under way. Pakistani government, that society as well as the Indian minority society is not ignorant or innocent of what is going on. All of them are ably aiding and abating this insurgency.
In the backdrop it is ridiculous for a senior BJP leader to write a book with such nonsense. It is lousy evaluation of historical facts and a complete lack of understanding of the past, present or future. There is nothing academic about it. There is no place for such a person in BJP. I would say “dump him.”
bastards got a point
bastards got a point again...........
while congis r busy making trips to the interiors ,bjp instead of analysing themselves ,have started to show off their stupid books,i will tell ,this jaswant singh (sorry am far too young to name him)is behaving as if he wants some cheap publicity and wanted to cash on his book to creat hipe.
I THINK TIME HAS COME FOR US TO LEAVE THIS STUPID BJP BEHIND US AND START AN ORGANISATION ,REPRESENTING OUR OWN YOUTH ,COS TIME HAS COME AND WE SHOULD NOT FEEL SORRY RATHER ACT NOW.PLEASE RESPOND.ITS A QUESTION MARK ON US.WAT SAY?
This book of Jaswant is last
This book of Jaswant is last nail in the coffin of BJP
WHATEVER JASWANT HAS WRITTEN
WHATEVER JASWANT HAS WRITTEN ABOUT NEHRU IS TRUE, HE IS MORE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DIVISION OF THE COUNTRY THAN JINNAH. NEHRU A STAUNCH MUSLIM GAVE AWAY PAKISTAN TO MUSLIMS AND HE HAS GIVEN AWAY INDIA TO MUSLIMS NOW MUSLIMS HAVE BOTH PAKISTAN AND INDIA. IN 1947 THE SLOGAN OF MUSLIM LEAGUE WAS "MAANG KE LENGE PAKISTAN LADKAR LENGE HINDUSTAN", THANKS TO CONGRESS AND INNOCENT INDIAN PUBLIC THAT HAS BECOME A REALITY.
AND HINDUS ARE REFUGEES IN THEIR OWN COUNTRY.
HOW CAN A MUSLIM BE
HOW CAN A MUSLIM BE 'SECULAR' ? I AM YET TO FIND A MUSLIM WHO IS NOT A FANATIC. BUT JASWANT SINGH FOUND ONE, IN JINNAH !
WHAT WAS HIS QUALIFICATION ON THE BASIS OF WHICH HE WS APPOINTED FM THEN, FM BY VAJPAYEE ?
IS HE A PATRIOT ? OR AN 'AFIMCHI' ?
YOU CANT MAKE MUSLIMS
YOU CANT MAKE MUSLIMS SECULAR, THEY ARE TOO FANATIC, THE ONLY WAY OUT IS TO IMPART MODERN EDUCATION TO THEIR GIRLS, SECONDLY WE AS A NATION LACK NATIONAL SPIRIT, POLITICALLY WE WORSHIP THE RISING SUN, WE WORSHIP D-COMPANY STARS AND D-COMPANY WHORES AND CRICKET MATCH FIXERS. THE SITUATION IS TOO CONVENIENT FOR CONGRESS, IT IS UPTO THE BJP TO INCULCATE NATIONAL SPIRIT IN THE INDIAN PUBLIC, THE INDIAN PUBLIC SHOULD BE EXPLAINED THAT ALL THE SMALLER PARTIES ARE AN EXTENSION OF CONGRESS PARTY AND THEREFORE BJP SHOULD GO IT ALONE WETHER IT IS PUNJAB, BIHAR OR FOR THAT MATTER MAHARASHRA, ONLY THIS APPROACH WOULD STRENGTHEN IT OTHERWISE WE ARE DOOMED AS NATION.
not only in jinnah, as such
not only in jinnah, as such he has described all muslim as good and he expressed that he has seen pain in indian muslim eyes!
the biggest pseudo no. 1 of india!
Shri Jaswantsinhji should
Shri Jaswantsinhji should devote his energies in revamping BJP so that Hindus become free [ like him] to say what they want.Presently every genuine Hindu's concerns for Hindustan and Hindu Sanskriti are treated as communal poison.How about liberating Hindus first rather than worry about a man long dead and gone?He is irrelevant for India and Indians.We don't know whether shri Jaswant Sinhji has mentioned anything about " direct action" day of Muslim League in this book.If yes, we don't know the person[s] who were responsible for this Black day for Hindus of undivided India.
Mr.pkkushwaha , for my
Mr.pkkushwaha , for my previous article actually u have misunderstood me(http://www.sanghparivar.org/blog/saugato-banerjee/advani-was-right-to-sa...)!
in my article, i had not given clean chit to jinaah & it was not my wish to call jinnah as 'secular' rather i was expressing that his act was a blessing in disguise for hindus and explaining that if, he is called 'secular', then how he shud be called 'secular'!
i was trying to clarify Mr. Advani's comment for Jinna to be secular in my own way that how jinnah can be called 'secular'in any way if such requirent felt! i thought , my explanation might help someone to pardon Advani for his infamous declaration about jinnah!
what we see to-day as secularism in india, is it secularism? no! depriving urself, giving oppurtunity to others is not secularism as , if u r secular, the same right and oppurtunity to be given to all and that is secularism! if one is sraight forward and speaks for the benefit of his own community,it is not against secularism but it is for the sake of secularism only where one shud raise his voice if he is being deprived! Jinnah's act thus was not like our pseudo secular politicians who r always doing appeasement business with muslims & christians, depriving hindus! so, as, jinnah thought that hindu and muslim could not stay together, he asked for partition! if he wud not tell for partition and pretended to be pseudo secular like nothing wud happen, then it wud have been wrong! that i had tried to clarify!
jinnah was secular for his muslim people who thought that it was not possible to get all right equally if he stayed in india and with pseudo secular like jawaharlal! and that's how, he can be called as secular! but my expression was not harming anyone but helping to justify both Advani (for calling jinnah as secular) and jinnah as divider!in my writing, i had not distorted the history!
in this present scenerio, i will tell that if u want to gain political gainage over congress, then there also way was there as u cud blame congress for not letting the remaining muslim to go to pakistan during partition for which hindus r facing now existence problem, life threatening,killing, displacement in india itself by the sizeable muslim, christian population in many states! and all appeasement today is existing due to the decision of jahaharlal to call muslim to stay back when hindus have sacrificed their life to the tune of 1.5 million! why it was done? why hindus have not got their own country ? the sole purpose of partion was sending all muslim to pakistan on religion basis, on two nation theory, then why we have kept muslim here? for all these things, congress is responsible and congress cud be blamed to-day also if there was any requirement of political benefit but not distorting the history as was done by Mr. jaswant to appease muslim which will give the benefit to congress only at this stage!congress in turn can tell that if the parition was done by us, yes, it was for the help of hindus only which hindus may take positively! muslim of india hardly regard jinnah as jinnah had not spent life as per islam! muslim knew that jinnah's act was indirect help to hindus! so, this act of Mr. Jaswant will not help BJP but will damage more as it may loss the remaining votes of hindus also!
This Jaswant is fool.
This Jaswant is fool. Prophet Mohd. was great, Jesus is great, but these are not to be pondered by Hindus. Whether Jinnah was great or not is useless topic for us. Jaswant is trying to justify the folly done by Mr. Advani and therby proving that the former is a sycophant. I again repeat "If you eat shit by mistake, it is better to admit the mistake rather than prescribing shit to each and everyone." So if Advani committed a mistake by going to Jinnah's mazar, there are number of ways of admitting this mistake and won't cost anything. But the ongoing prerscription is going to cost dearly. The BJP must throw out persons like Jaswant Singh.
pk
yes, u r right! present
yes, u r right!
present indian hindu wants to see what BJP is doing for hindu right and not presentling a muslim as right or wrong!
what is our benefit now?
r muslims sane? what is the present experience with them?
whoever has done the partition, i salute him or them! because of him or them, we r still alive as a hindu!
BJP has given again chance to congress for cash it !