FAKE GANDHI FAMILY IS DESTROYING INDIA & HINDUISM--KNOW THEIR FAMILY HISTORY TO UNDERSTAND WHY !!!

It is now a real a mughal-Crusade combined dynasty ruling India since independence from  British.   

 

MUSLIM GANDHI FAMILY 

Jawaharlal nehuru’s grandfather was a muslim, namely Ghiasuddin Gazi , delhi kotwal, who to escape british soldiers during “sipahi vidhroh” changed his name to Gangadhar Nehuru(false kasmiri pandit) family. Change of name  could not underline their loyalty towards their own muslim community, the legacy followed by Motilal, then Jawahar, then Indira  but originally, they were all muslim who never changed to Hinduism and never were loyal to hindus! they had always a favoured view towards muslims and a biased view towards hindus and never had a equal & neutral view for both! In short, I can tell, it was Jawahar who restricted remaining muslims to go to Pakistan during partition, when muslim got their two country by parting India! by doing such,actually Jawahar kept the problem with us what we r facing now! when the separate country was demanded by Jinnah, he expressed that when a first hindu converted to muslim in India, requirement of separate country was started as he knew, being a muslim that muslim can not stay together peacefully with other religion! then, when they were given separate country, then why Jawahar restricted the remaining muslim to migrate? another, it was Jawahar who objected in parliament to accept the national anthem for “Vande Matharam” what normally muslims do not acknowledge till date ! there r many but my intention is not here to describe all such but regarding the fake Gandhi family!

Indira Priyadarshini(Gazi), Jawahar Nehru(Gazi)’s daughter when studying in London, fell in love & got nikahed  to Feroze Khan in a Mosque in London & became Maimuna Begam( though she was muslim either!). Feroze’ father was a  Muslim grocer by the name of Jehangir Nawab Khan, from the Junagadh area of Gujarat had married a Parsi woman (from persian Gandhey sect) after converting her to Islam. If Indira Nehru(fake!) were to marry a Muslim with open identity, she would loose the possibility of becoming the heir to the future Nehru dynasty though it was  also itself created on wrong base to hoodwink hindus by nehuru family himself but they did not want to loose it for their political mileage due to marriage with open muslim identity. At this juncture, Mahatma Gandhi intervened to safeguard political future of Nehuru and convinced Feroze Khan, gave him the idea to adopt ‘Gandhi’ title as his family name/caste name, resembling the  Feroze's mother's family name ,Ghandey, what luckily got the reason to befool Indian, incase of any explanation and thus he was changed to  Feroze  Gandhi, sometime before his wedding with Indira, by an affidavit in England. But we fool Indian never doubt on this and believed that Feroze was maximum Persian Gandhey (changed to Gandhi) & adopted son of Mahatma Gandhi.

The existence of Feroze's tomb proves beyond doubt that Feroze was neither a Parsi, nor a Hindu. Had he been a Hindu, his body would have been cremated and had he been a Parsi, his dead body would have been eaten by vultures in a Tower of Silence. The evidence points to the only alternative that Feroze was a Muslim, when he died.  The purpose of Feroze Gandhi(to spell) affidavit was solely to cheat the whole world/Nation, even in to-day village people, a large section of Indian society think Indira Nehuru(Khan), called Indira Gandhi,  was grand-daughter of MK Gandhi (who won freedom for India).People must think once about this cunning, fraud incidents which is changing the history, going forward and fooling people till date with the hidden anti-hindu agenda.  

 

PRESENT CHRISTIAN GANDHI FAMILY:  

 

When Rajiv Gandhi(Khan), younger son of Indira Gandhi(Maimuna Begam) married Antanio Maino of Turin, Italy, he converted himself  to Catholic and renamed himself to Roberto. His daughter’s name is   Bianca and son's name is Raul. Quite cleverly the same names are presented to the people of India as Priyanka and Rahul. What is amazing is the extent of our people's  ignorance in such matters. Bianca & Raul(priyanka & Rahul, by birth Christian) were born in Italy gaining them default citizens.If problem arise they(including Antanio, for sure) would easily runaway . Interestingly Bianca (priyanka) married to  christian family only.The press conference that Rajiv Gandhi gave in London after taking over as prime minister of India was very informative. In this press conference, Rajiv(Roberto)  boasted that he was NOT a Hindu but a Parsi. Mind you, speaking of the  Parsi  religion, he had no Parsi ancestor at all & that time he was already converted to Christianity! One frequently hears that Rajiv Gandhi's grandfather (nanaji) was Jawahar nehuru(khan). we all know that everyone has two grandfathers, the paternal (dadaji) and the maternal (nanaji) grandfathers. In fact, the paternal (dadaji) grandfather is deemed to be the more important grandfather in most societies. Why is it then, nowhere, we find Rajiv Gandhi's paternal (dadaji) grandfather' s name? It appears that the reason is simply. Rajiv Gandhi's paternal (dadaji) grandfather was a Muslim exposure name (Jehangir Nawab Khan) what they did not like to acknowledge due to their political and anti-hindu agenda in India as we discussed above. AS said,this Muslim grocer by the name of Nawab Khan, had married the said  Parsi woman after converting her to Islam. This was the source where from the myth of Rajiv being a Parsi was derived. His grandmother (his father's mother) had turned Muslim after having abandoned the Parsi religion to marry Nawab Khan as already described above.  And surprise of surprises, Rajiv was even cremated as per Vedic rites in full view of India's public to again hoodwink the public. It is another fact that now-a-days, crhistians r also going for cremation of dead bodies to pretend like hindus and hoodwink the fool hindus in their folder(as recently happening in kerala). O.K., coming to the point,  Remember, what Rajiv told on sikh massacre in 1984 after Indira Gandhi assasination, with no repent , he expressed that ‘when a big tree fell down, earth shuttered’!  sikh massacre was never ever done by hindus but it was congressis who had been leaded by Christian Tytler and many Jaichands(Jindus, commonly known as pseudo hindus) & Roberto himself!

Presently, we know, Antanio(sonia) is super PM and regulating the congress and his both son & daughter(both r Christian by birth itself) are in the process of being future prime ministership!  

 

Thus, we see all along anti-hindu activities by the congress as they were never(except P V Nasrashima rao) headed by a true hindu.

Being started from muslim family to present Christian, they have become very loyal to both and because of many Jaichand in hindus & little resistence from hindus,  their anti-hindu activities have become more easier for which they / their party r being funded by western world,usa and arab, muslim countries.

Christian missionaries/Christian, Islamic terrorist organizations, conversion thus breeding to act against hindus/Hinduism and destroy our country’s heritage, custom & ritual. hence, we see,  all application of law against hindus only.  

 

Thus a family, who feel ashamed to tell they were Muslim or Christian, then how they can be loyal to India  

 

I am not telling that they have done the mistake by converting themselves to other religion but they have certainly committed / been committing sin by their anti-hindu activities which proves beyond doubt that they r not loyal to Hindus or the majority when their puppet go to tell that much that all country’s  resources r belonged to muslims and going with similar implementation and announcing God Ram as a fictional figure! they r always carrying their hidden anti-hindu agenda. Sanjay Gandhi, elder son of Indira Gandhi(khan) chose a separate track and married to a hindu girl and truly a was a friend of hindu and so, in sonia’s language he was a ‘fake gandhi’! indeed, as real gandhis r either muslim or Christian and anti-hindu,  then how sanjay Gandhi legacy have been talking in favor of hindus? so, sanjay varun Gandhi, indeed a different Gandhi, fake to sonia’s maternal dynasty but real to us! in my terms if, a muslim support hindutva or Hinduism, hindu culture,being tolerant to hindu festivals, stay together, respect hindus and do not go for conversion or do not go for marrying hindu girl to give birth of muslim generation with muslim name or do not act as per the unethical tenets of Islam, he in fact becomes hindu. So, only Sanjay Gandhi's legacy of that fake Gandhi family link can be considered as like hindu or a freind of hindu but we can not consider other ancestor or predecessor of same family as a freind of hindu or like hindu as they have always been doing anti-hindu or anti-national activities!  

 

India had got only two hindu govt. since independence and those were of PV Narasimha Rao(a true friend of hindu) and Atal Bihari Bajpayee to it's full term! and we have seen, hindu movement(like massive Ram Janmabhomi andolan throughout the country) only during P V Narashima Rao govt. for which he was ditched by the congress as how congress (which was solely, under the  muslim family rule up to 1984 and after which Christian family rule, from Roberto (Rajiv Gandhi khan) to now super PM Antanio maino…onwards..), can indulge  pro-hindu activities?!  

Source: many sources, books, internet informations and few link r as here:

http://www.asiasource.org/society/indiragandhi.cfm

http://www.vepachedu.org/Nehrudynasty.ht...

http://www.expressindia.com/news/ie/daily/19980210/04150074.html

Read more by searching google for 'nehru dynasty'

.................................................................................................................

 

ANUJ ASHWINI's picture

KAYARTA KE MAHAN PRATEEK,

KAYARTA KE MAHAN PRATEEK, KAYARON KE KAYAR, MAHA KAYAR, SHRI SHRI KAYAR SAVARKAR.

Savarkar's Apology Letter ....Content and Analysis

CONTENTS :

Petition from V D Savarkar (Convict No. 32778) to the Home Member of the Government of India, dated November 14, 1913.

I beg to submit the following points for your kind consideration:

(1) When I came here in 1911 June, I was along with the rest of the convicts of my party taken to the office of the Chief Commissioner. There I was classed as "D" meaning dangerous prisoner; the rest of the convicts were not classed as "D". Then I had to pass full 6 months in solitary confinement. The other convicts had not. During that time I was put on the coir pounding though my hands were bleeding. Then I was put on the oil-mill - the hardest labour in the jail. Although my conduct during all the time was exceptionally good still at the end of these six months I was not sent out of the jail; though the other convicts who came with me were. From that time to this day I have tried to keep my behaviour as good as possible.

(2) When I petitioned for promotion I was told I was a special class prisoner and so could not be promoted. When any of us asked for better food or any special treatment we were told "You are only ordinary convicts and must eat what the rest do". Thus Sir, Your Honour would see that only for special disadvantages we are classed as special prisoners.

(3) When the majority of the casemen were sent outside I requested for my release. But, although I had been cased (caned?) hardly twice or thrice and some of those who were released, for a dozen and more times, still I was not released with them because I was their casemen. But when after all, the order for my release was given and when just then some of the political prisoners outside were brought into the troubles I was locked in with them because I was their casemen.

(4) If I was in Indian jails I would have by this time earned much remission, could have sent more letters home, got visits. If I was a transportee pure and simple I would have by this time been released, from this jail and would have been looking forward for ticket-leave, etc. But as it is, I have neither the advantages of the Indian jail nor of this convict colony regulation; though had to undergo the disadvanatges of both.

(5) Therefore will your honour be pleased to put an end to this anomalous situation in which I have been placed, by either sending me to Indian jails or by treating me as a transportee just like any other prisoner. I am not asking for any preferential treatment, though I believe as a political prisoner even that could have been expected in any civilized administration in the Independent nations of the world; but only for the concessions and favour that are shown even to the most depraved of convicts and habitual criminals? This present plan of shutting me up in this jail permanently makes me quite hopeless of any possibility of sustaining life and hope. For those who are term convicts the thing is different, but Sir, I have 50 years staring me in the face! How can I pull up moral energy enough to pass them in close confinement when even those concessions which the vilest of convicts can claim to smoothen their life are denied to me? Either please to send me to Indian jail for there I would earn (a) remission; (b) would have a visit from my people come every four months for those who had unfortunately been in jail know what a blessing it is to have a sight of one’s nearest and dearest every now and then! (c) and above all a moral - though not a legal - right of being entitled to release in 14 years; (d) also more letters and other little advantages. Or if I cannot be sent to India I should be released and sent outside with a hope, like any other convicts, to visits after 5 years, getting my ticket leave and calling over my family here. If this is granted then only one grievance remains and that is that I should be held responsible only for my own faults and not of others. It is a pity that I have to ask for this - it is such a fundamental right of every human being! For as there are on the one hand, some 20 political prisoners - young, active and restless, and on the other the regulations of a convict colony, by the very nature of them reducing the liberties of thought and expression to lowest minimum possible; it is but inevitable that every now and then some one of them will be found to have contravened a regulation or two and if all be held responsible for that, as now it is actually done - very little chance of being left outside remains for me.

In the end may I remind your honour to be so good as to go through the petition for clemency, that I had sent in 1911, and to sanction it for being forwarded to the Indian Government? The latest development of the Indian politics and the conciliating policy of the government have thrown open the constitutional line once more. Now no man having the good of India and Humanity at heart will blindly step on the thorny paths which in the excited and hopeless situation of India in 1906-1907 beguiled us from the path of peace and progress. Therefore if the government in their manifold beneficence and mercy release me, I for one cannot but be the staunchest advocate of constitutional progress and loyalty to the English government which is the foremost condition of that progress. As long as we are in jails there cannot be real happiness and joy in hundreds and thousands of homes of His Majesty’s loyal subjects in India, for blood is thicker than water; but if we be released the people will instinctively raise a shout of joy and gratitude to the government, who knows how to forgive and correct, more than how to chastise and avenge. Moreover my conversion to the constitutional line would bring back all those misled young men in India and abroad who were once looking up to me as their guide. I am ready to serve the government in any capacity they like, for as my conversion is conscientious so I hope my future conduct would be. By keeping me in jail nothing can be got in comparison to what would be otherwise. The Mighty alone can afford to be merciful and therefore where else can the prodigal son return but to the parental doors of the government?

Hoping your Honour will kindly take into notion these points.

ANALYSIS:

The authenticity of the above letter has been established time and again by eminent historians of India chief amongst them ironically is Mr.R. C. Mujumdar who himself belongs to the hindutva camp.Yet many of the Savarkar supporters are in a denial mode.Even then after this the psyche of Savarkar behind writing this letter (and 3 others) began to be probed into.

The common defense that comes in the support of Mr Savarkar is that he wrote the letters to trick the british Govt into setting him free so that once he comes out he could do his work again.So much strong is the argument that Savarkar's this letter is even compared to the letters written by Shivaji Maharaj to Aurangazeb while the former was in captive at Agra. This argument I suspect should have come from the RSS as they idolize Savarkar.But is there even a grain of truth in it?I say not.

If we see the mercy plea carefully we will find that in the first half Savarkar writes about the bitter treatment and complains about the food.This is hardly going to hurt hurt the british empire anyway.The sole purpose for including those things is for a better life for himself.

Even if the argument in the second part is to be believed that Savarkar wanted to trick the British Govt, one can say that he succeeded, though not immediately.Savarkar was sentenced to 50 yrs but was released in 14 yrs.

What the Hindutva camp do not say out in loud is that even congress member and Sardar Patels brother Vitthalbhai Patel backed by Mahatma Gandhi moved to court seek Savarkars release in 1920.

Was it due to his letters or congress effort or change of heart of the British Savarkar was released in 1924.What is interesting to note is Savarkars behavior after his release.

For that read the Paragraph again

"...Therefore if the government in their manifold beneficence and mercy release me, I for one cannot but be the staunchest advocate of constitutional progress and loyalty to the English government which is the foremost condition of that progress. As long as we are in jails there cannot be real happiness and joy in hundreds and thousands of homes of His Majesty’s loyal subjects in India, for blood is thicker than water; but if we be released the people will instinctively raise a shout of joy and gratitude to the government, who knows how to forgive and correct, more than how to chastise and avenge. Moreover my conversion to the constitutional line would bring back all those misled young men in India and abroad who were once looking up to me as their guide. I am ready to serve the government in any capacity they like, for as my conversion is conscientious so I hope my future conduct would be...."

Savarkar promised that he would never go against the british govt and that he would bring back the "young men misled on the path of freedom" back on the track.If we examine the works of Savarkar after his release we find that he did exactly what he promised.
For some reasons best known to Savarkar himself, he suddenly had no objections to the British ruling India.He became an law-abiding citizen of the British India.He gave up his freedom struggle activities and started his Hindutva campaign.There is not a single speech, single article, single call to the nations by Savarkar after 1924 in which Savarkar critisized the British.He neither joined Congress which was working for the freedom of the country from the british rule nor did he start any political body of his own supporting that cause.

All his guns which were first pointed towards the British now were trained at the Muslims.Some of the quote of his would be sufficient for stating how he was creating communal tension in the times when hindu muslim unity was the need of the hour.

“The scandalous activities of Bengal Moslem gundas and proselytisers, working hand in hand have become so persistent and so notorious that one cannot understand how the Hindus in East Bengal have grown so incredibly emasculated” ; “The Moslem shopkeepers, those who visit Hindu ladies for selling glass bangles, Moslem servants in Hindu houses – all try to seduce or kidnap boys and girls and generally force them to accept Mahommedanism”[V. D. SAVARKAR, “Facts Without Comment”, Pg 180.]

This is not the only thing.He promised full co-operation to the Britishers.In 1937 he urged all the hindus to help the britishers in the war under the pretext of getting trained in arms and ammunitions so that it can be used latter.Could there have been any better opportunity of using the training than assisting Subhash Chandra Bose?But did Savarkar ever make any call to his hindu youths to join Subhash Babu??Nay...Infact so active was Savarkar in assiting the British army that because of his zeal many congress people even called him as the recruiting officer of the british army.

That Savarkar did not participate in any freedom struggle activities post his cellular jail is an established fact...as promised in the letter.

That Savarkar opposed congress and Gandhiji(who backed his release from cellular jail) is an established fact.... as promised in the letter

That Savarkar diverted lacks of hindus youths from the path of freedom struggle to his Hindutva is an established fact...as promised in the letter.

That Savarkar helped the britishers is an established fact...again as promised in the letter.

Savarkar staunchly advocated the two-nation theory and the partition of India. He said: “I have no quarrel with Mr. Jinnah’s two-nation theory. We, Hindus are a nation by ourselves and it is a historical fact that Hindus and Muslims are two nations”[V.D. SAVARKAR, Hindutva, 140.]

A.G.Noorani notes that Savarkar propounded the two-nation theory first in 1923 in his Hindutva and next in 1937 in his presidential address to the Hindu Mahasabha

In his early days when he wrote "The war of Independence 1857" written in 1909 he stresses on Hindu-Muslim unity appreciating even the muslims for their role,criticizing the British Govt.But post his Andaman Days his hindu muslim unity goes out of the windown and he says "Muslim remains a Muslim first and Muslim last and Indians never" [V.D.SAVARKAR, Hindu Sanghatan, 68]

A lot more of his quotes can be brought out but that would be unecessary.I am sure readers would have formed their opinion by now.Is there any truth in the claim that Savarkar had begged for his freedom only to fool the British?To me his actions doesnt say so...
One last thing that needs to be said is about the comparison of Savarkar to Shivaji Maharaj.If Shivaji Maharaj wrote the letters, he on gaining the freedom from the Emperor faught back, but Savarkar when he wrote the letters on gaining freedom chickened out....Thats the difference between Great and Pseudo-Great.What do you think?

ANUJ ASHWINI's picture

KAYARTA KE MAHAN PRATEEK,

KAYARTA KE MAHAN PRATEEK, KAYARON KE KAYAR, MAHA KAYAR, SHRI SHRI KAYAR SAVARKAR.

Savarkar's Apology Letter ....Content and Analysis

CONTENTS :

Petition from V D Savarkar (Convict No. 32778) to the Home Member of the Government of India, dated November 14, 1913.

I beg to submit the following points for your kind consideration:

(1) When I came here in 1911 June, I was along with the rest of the convicts of my party taken to the office of the Chief Commissioner. There I was classed as "D" meaning dangerous prisoner; the rest of the convicts were not classed as "D". Then I had to pass full 6 months in solitary confinement. The other convicts had not. During that time I was put on the coir pounding though my hands were bleeding. Then I was put on the oil-mill - the hardest labour in the jail. Although my conduct during all the time was exceptionally good still at the end of these six months I was not sent out of the jail; though the other convicts who came with me were. From that time to this day I have tried to keep my behaviour as good as possible.

(2) When I petitioned for promotion I was told I was a special class prisoner and so could not be promoted. When any of us asked for better food or any special treatment we were told "You are only ordinary convicts and must eat what the rest do". Thus Sir, Your Honour would see that only for special disadvantages we are classed as special prisoners.

(3) When the majority of the casemen were sent outside I requested for my release. But, although I had been cased (caned?) hardly twice or thrice and some of those who were released, for a dozen and more times, still I was not released with them because I was their casemen. But when after all, the order for my release was given and when just then some of the political prisoners outside were brought into the troubles I was locked in with them because I was their casemen.

(4) If I was in Indian jails I would have by this time earned much remission, could have sent more letters home, got visits. If I was a transportee pure and simple I would have by this time been released, from this jail and would have been looking forward for ticket-leave, etc. But as it is, I have neither the advantages of the Indian jail nor of this convict colony regulation; though had to undergo the disadvanatges of both.

(5) Therefore will your honour be pleased to put an end to this anomalous situation in which I have been placed, by either sending me to Indian jails or by treating me as a transportee just like any other prisoner. I am not asking for any preferential treatment, though I believe as a political prisoner even that could have been expected in any civilized administration in the Independent nations of the world; but only for the concessions and favour that are shown even to the most depraved of convicts and habitual criminals? This present plan of shutting me up in this jail permanently makes me quite hopeless of any possibility of sustaining life and hope. For those who are term convicts the thing is different, but Sir, I have 50 years staring me in the face! How can I pull up moral energy enough to pass them in close confinement when even those concessions which the vilest of convicts can claim to smoothen their life are denied to me? Either please to send me to Indian jail for there I would earn (a) remission; (b) would have a visit from my people come every four months for those who had unfortunately been in jail know what a blessing it is to have a sight of one’s nearest and dearest every now and then! (c) and above all a moral - though not a legal - right of being entitled to release in 14 years; (d) also more letters and other little advantages. Or if I cannot be sent to India I should be released and sent outside with a hope, like any other convicts, to visits after 5 years, getting my ticket leave and calling over my family here. If this is granted then only one grievance remains and that is that I should be held responsible only for my own faults and not of others. It is a pity that I have to ask for this - it is such a fundamental right of every human being! For as there are on the one hand, some 20 political prisoners - young, active and restless, and on the other the regulations of a convict colony, by the very nature of them reducing the liberties of thought and expression to lowest minimum possible; it is but inevitable that every now and then some one of them will be found to have contravened a regulation or two and if all be held responsible for that, as now it is actually done - very little chance of being left outside remains for me.

In the end may I remind your honour to be so good as to go through the petition for clemency, that I had sent in 1911, and to sanction it for being forwarded to the Indian Government? The latest development of the Indian politics and the conciliating policy of the government have thrown open the constitutional line once more. Now no man having the good of India and Humanity at heart will blindly step on the thorny paths which in the excited and hopeless situation of India in 1906-1907 beguiled us from the path of peace and progress. Therefore if the government in their manifold beneficence and mercy release me, I for one cannot but be the staunchest advocate of constitutional progress and loyalty to the English government which is the foremost condition of that progress. As long as we are in jails there cannot be real happiness and joy in hundreds and thousands of homes of His Majesty’s loyal subjects in India, for blood is thicker than water; but if we be released the people will instinctively raise a shout of joy and gratitude to the government, who knows how to forgive and correct, more than how to chastise and avenge. Moreover my conversion to the constitutional line would bring back all those misled young men in India and abroad who were once looking up to me as their guide. I am ready to serve the government in any capacity they like, for as my conversion is conscientious so I hope my future conduct would be. By keeping me in jail nothing can be got in comparison to what would be otherwise. The Mighty alone can afford to be merciful and therefore where else can the prodigal son return but to the parental doors of the government?

Hoping your Honour will kindly take into notion these points.

ANALYSIS:

The authenticity of the above letter has been established time and again by eminent historians of India chief amongst them ironically is Mr.R. C. Mujumdar who himself belongs to the hindutva camp.Yet many of the Savarkar supporters are in a denial mode.Even then after this the psyche of Savarkar behind writing this letter (and 3 others) began to be probed into.

The common defense that comes in the support of Mr Savarkar is that he wrote the letters to trick the british Govt into setting him free so that once he comes out he could do his work again.So much strong is the argument that Savarkar's this letter is even compared to the letters written by Shivaji Maharaj to Aurangazeb while the former was in captive at Agra. This argument I suspect should have come from the RSS as they idolize Savarkar.But is there even a grain of truth in it?I say not.

If we see the mercy plea carefully we will find that in the first half Savarkar writes about the bitter treatment and complains about the food.This is hardly going to hurt hurt the british empire anyway.The sole purpose for including those things is for a better life for himself.

Even if the argument in the second part is to be believed that Savarkar wanted to trick the British Govt, one can say that he succeeded, though not immediately.Savarkar was sentenced to 50 yrs but was released in 14 yrs.

What the Hindutva camp do not say out in loud is that even congress member and Sardar Patels brother Vitthalbhai Patel backed by Mahatma Gandhi moved to court seek Savarkars release in 1920.

Was it due to his letters or congress effort or change of heart of the British Savarkar was released in 1924.What is interesting to note is Savarkars behavior after his release.

For that read the Paragraph again

"...Therefore if the government in their manifold beneficence and mercy release me, I for one cannot but be the staunchest advocate of constitutional progress and loyalty to the English government which is the foremost condition of that progress. As long as we are in jails there cannot be real happiness and joy in hundreds and thousands of homes of His Majesty’s loyal subjects in India, for blood is thicker than water; but if we be released the people will instinctively raise a shout of joy and gratitude to the government, who knows how to forgive and correct, more than how to chastise and avenge. Moreover my conversion to the constitutional line would bring back all those misled young men in India and abroad who were once looking up to me as their guide. I am ready to serve the government in any capacity they like, for as my conversion is conscientious so I hope my future conduct would be...."

Savarkar promised that he would never go against the british govt and that he would bring back the "young men misled on the path of freedom" back on the track.If we examine the works of Savarkar after his release we find that he did exactly what he promised.
For some reasons best known to Savarkar himself, he suddenly had no objections to the British ruling India.He became an law-abiding citizen of the British India.He gave up his freedom struggle activities and started his Hindutva campaign.There is not a single speech, single article, single call to the nations by Savarkar after 1924 in which Savarkar critisized the British.He neither joined Congress which was working for the freedom of the country from the british rule nor did he start any political body of his own supporting that cause.

All his guns which were first pointed towards the British now were trained at the Muslims.Some of the quote of his would be sufficient for stating how he was creating communal tension in the times when hindu muslim unity was the need of the hour.

“The scandalous activities of Bengal Moslem gundas and proselytisers, working hand in hand have become so persistent and so notorious that one cannot understand how the Hindus in East Bengal have grown so incredibly emasculated” ; “The Moslem shopkeepers, those who visit Hindu ladies for selling glass bangles, Moslem servants in Hindu houses – all try to seduce or kidnap boys and girls and generally force them to accept Mahommedanism”[V. D. SAVARKAR, “Facts Without Comment”, Pg 180.]

This is not the only thing.He promised full co-operation to the Britishers.In 1937 he urged all the hindus to help the britishers in the war under the pretext of getting trained in arms and ammunitions so that it can be used latter.Could there have been any better opportunity of using the training than assisting Subhash Chandra Bose?But did Savarkar ever make any call to his hindu youths to join Subhash Babu??Nay...Infact so active was Savarkar in assiting the British army that because of his zeal many congress people even called him as the recruiting officer of the british army.

That Savarkar did not participate in any freedom struggle activities post his cellular jail is an established fact...as promised in the letter.

That Savarkar opposed congress and Gandhiji(who backed his release from cellular jail) is an established fact.... as promised in the letter

That Savarkar diverted lacks of hindus youths from the path of freedom struggle to his Hindutva is an established fact...as promised in the letter.

That Savarkar helped the britishers is an established fact...again as promised in the letter.

Savarkar staunchly advocated the two-nation theory and the partition of India. He said: “I have no quarrel with Mr. Jinnah’s two-nation theory. We, Hindus are a nation by ourselves and it is a historical fact that Hindus and Muslims are two nations”[V.D. SAVARKAR, Hindutva, 140.]

A.G.Noorani notes that Savarkar propounded the two-nation theory first in 1923 in his Hindutva and next in 1937 in his presidential address to the Hindu Mahasabha

In his early days when he wrote "The war of Independence 1857" written in 1909 he stresses on Hindu-Muslim unity appreciating even the muslims for their role,criticizing the British Govt.But post his Andaman Days his hindu muslim unity goes out of the windown and he says "Muslim remains a Muslim first and Muslim last and Indians never" [V.D.SAVARKAR, Hindu Sanghatan, 68]

A lot more of his quotes can be brought out but that would be unecessary.I am sure readers would have formed their opinion by now.Is there any truth in the claim that Savarkar had begged for his freedom only to fool the British?To me his actions doesnt say so...
One last thing that needs to be said is about the comparison of Savarkar to Shivaji Maharaj.If Shivaji Maharaj wrote the letters, he on gaining the freedom from the Emperor faught back, but Savarkar when he wrote the letters on gaining freedom chickened out....Thats the difference between Great and Pseudo-Great.What do you think?

Indian1's picture

dear mr. sankarlingam (i am

dear mr. sankarlingam (i am not sure real or fake). If muslims seem to be underrepresented it it by their will and choice. please look at Bolywood , dominated by Muslims who are mostly marrying Hindu women to ........ Keep their womenfolk under veil. they do not have to bother about their women , thanks to Nehruji and the communal laws he invented. He has allowed Only and Only Muslim men to practice polygamy.The literacy among muslim women is extremely low which makes this pratice of polygamy easy to implement. You and the media seems to be indiffrent towards this reality!!!

EyeOpener's picture

Famous quotes by famous

Famous quotes by famous Christians about christanity:

When the missionaries came to Africa they had the Bible and we had the land. They said "Let us pray." We closed our eyes. When we opened them we had the Bible and they had the land - Desmond Tutu

Just in terms of allocation of time resources, religion is not very efficient. There's a lot more I could be doing on a Sunday morning - Bill Gates

If a man would follow, today, the teachings of the Old Testament, he would be a criminal. If he would follow strictly the teachings of the New, he would be insane.
Robert Green Ingersoll

If Jesus had been killed twenty years ago, Catholic school children would be wearing little electric chairs around their necks instead of crosses - Lenny Bruce

No man ever believes that the Bible means what it says: He is always convinced that it says what he means - George Bernard Shaw

The Christian resolution to find the world ugly and bad has made the world ugly and bad - Friedrich Nietzsche

Eye Opnener's picture

Famous quotes by famous

Famous quotes by famous Christians about christanity:

When the missionaries came to Africa they had the Bible and we had the land. They said "Let us pray." We closed our eyes. When we opened them we had the Bible and they had the land - Desmond Tutu

Just in terms of allocation of time resources, religion is not very efficient. There's a lot more I could be doing on a Sunday morning - Bill Gates

If a man would follow, today, the teachings of the Old Testament, he would be a criminal. If he would follow strictly the teachings of the New, he would be insane - Robert Green Ingersoll

If Jesus had been killed twenty years ago, Catholic school children would be wearing little electric chairs around their necks instead of crosses - Lenny Bruce

No man ever believes that the Bible means what it says: He is always convinced that it says what he means - George Bernard Shaw

The Christian resolution to find the world ugly and bad has made the world ugly and bad - Friedrich Nietzsche

VMOULI's picture

Gohdhra massacre was not the

Gohdhra massacre was not the work of the Hindus.Do you know what happened before this 'so-called massacre' started? Their own people were involved and then the blame was forced onto the HINDUS.
Innocent HINDU people- women, children and men were locked inside the train that was stopped deliberately in conjunction with 'collaborators' and then set affire in cold blood and callosity. These were innocents who were returning from AYODHYA SRI RAMA MANDIR after doing 'KAR SEVA'.
Your heart is bleeding for the culprits.These 'followers of Mohamad' have since time immemorial been attacking and wounding SANATANA DHARMA and its followers . And greater is the pity and tragedy because these very people originate from our HINDU FOLD. They were battered ,tortured and by the fear of the sword of Mohamadan invaders were forcibly converted to Mohamedanism. This memory has long been deliberately obliterated due to the teaching of 'falsified history of Bharat' being taught in all schools of our country. That brain-washing began even before India got independence.The very formation and the current situation of Pakistan is proof to what is Mohamedanism and how their brains have been mutated due to their so-called religion of peace!Wherever today there is this 'belief system' they are going to pieces!
Bharat is a HINDU RASHTRA and the majority community is discriminated at every step !And it is the 2 minority communities (no need to mention their names )that enjoy the most privileges.
The other community is attacking SANATANIS with their foreign money-power and forcibly converting people and giving them rewards for getting converted and thus dividing our country. Could this ever happen in any other land than our SANATANA Bharat?Let these proselytisers just try in a Mohamedan country and they will not live to see the light of day!
And yet both these religions are creating havoc in our PUNYABHOOMI and this is being done with the sanction of 'authorities in places of power'.
What discrimination are you referring to ?Who is actually being discriminated ?
If Mohamedans are backward and not represented in the main streamline it is of their own doing.The dogmatic kuranic teachings and Sharia Law forbids them from doing anything and everything without their sanction and is strictly controlled by their archaic thinking and fearful-looking bearded 'mullas'. Pakistan is proof and so is Bangladesh - both that were once upon a time HINDU.Even Afghanistan was HINDU and Queen GANDHARI of our ITHIHAAS MAHABHARATA was from the GANDHAR RAJYAM which has become KANDAHAR .In Hindi language KHANDAR means 'ruin'and yes that is what Afghanistan is today!
All of South-east Asia was HINDU and BUDDHIST but today these are countries completely Mohamedanised.( By reading V.S.Naipaul's BEYOND BELIEF you may get insight as to what happened in the past and is still continuing). Solid proof still exists in the names that they carry which have roots from SAMSKRIT.The latest news piece on the Malaysian woman who is to be caned under Sharia law for drinking alcohol during the month of Ramadan has the name - Karthika Sukarno.This is just one small bit of proof!
Anyone with sense and sensibility can see the TRUTH of what happened in the past and what is happening in BHARAT today.
Our SANATANA DHARMA and INDIC CIVILISATION is under attack at every step and it is time we wake up to this fact!
WE ALL NEED TO GET OUR FACTS RIGHT SO THAT WE CAN ACT FOR DHARMA AND SATHYA!
VANDE MATARAM and SATHYAMEVA JAYATE!

saugato Banerjee's picture

very true Mr.VMOULI! it is

very true Mr.VMOULI!

it is very much true that conversion is not at all spiritual but a groupism is being carried out to disintegrate india!

the truth is whenever msulim wil gain sizeable quantity by breeding like mosquetos, they need a space for themselves by implementing their islamic law and declaring islamic state and implementing jiziya on non-muslim (mainly hindu community) whoever not yet killed or converted!

i can clearly foresee that there wil be atleast two partition of india further in twenty years!

i do not know why only hnidus in this world r self against, pseudo mentality people!

When reality stares on their face then they sheepishly look for excuses like: The British divided us for their divide and rule policy or RSS / Hindu Mahasabha divide us etc .

i tell these pseudo hindus, Ask yourself this: How come no Muslim leader has ever attributed the divide cause to someone? had they even blamed RSS ? Because they know that Jinnah was right when he said that the partition of India was destined the moment the first Indian converted to the Islamic faith. Jinnah or a muslim knew that a muslim can not stay together with hnidus as the former has no respect on others belief & they r totally intolerant in nature!

dr.rahul's picture

very new news for me .

very new news for me .

EMMANUEL JOHN EGURI's picture

(CONRESS CHEATING MAHATMA

(CONRESS CHEATING MAHATMA GANDHI'S FAMILY)........TUSHAR GANDHI SHOULD BE MADE THE VICE PRESIDENT OF INDIAN NATIONAL CONGRESS(INC)2nd POST AFTER SONIA GANDHI,BECAUSE THE INDIAN NATIONAL CONGRESS ALSO BELONGED TO MAHATMA GANDHI SAME AS NEHRU,BAPU PLAYED A BIG ROLE IN INC DURING FREEDOM MOVEMENT,WE THE PEOPLE OF INDIA HAVE COMPLETELY FORGOTTEN ABOUT THE RIGHTS OF BAPU'S FAMILY ON (INC),AT PRESENT THE (INC) HAS BECOME A PERMANMENT PROPERTY OF NEHRU-INDIRA FAMILY,THE MEMBERS OF BAPU'S FAMILY HAS BEEN COMPLETELY PUSHED A SIDE,IT DOSENT REALLY MATTERS AT ALL THAT TUSHAR APPEARED 50 YEARS AFTER THE DEATH OF BAPU,IT ALL MATTER THAT TUSHAR IS THE BLOOD OF BAPU'S FAMILY WHCIH IS MORE THEN ENOUGH,OUR SENIOR+CORRUPT+CUNNING CONGRESS LEADERS NEVER EVER invited TUSHAR SINCE FROM BEGINNING,NOBODY FROM CONGRESS TOLD HIM TO JOIN (AICC),IT WAS DUTY OF CONGRESS TO HAND OVER 2nd KEY POST OF(AICC) TO TUSHAR GANDHI AS A RESPECT TO THE FAMILY OF (FATHER OF THE NATION)BECAUSE CONGRESS IGNORED TUSHAR HE WAS FORCED JOIN (SP)IN 1998 TO FIGHT ELECTION FROM MUMBAI.THE MP/MLA OF CONGRESS ACROSS THE COUNTRY HAVE SUCESSFULLY ENTERED THEIR WHOLE FAMILY INTO CONGRESS.THINKING THAT THE(INC)IS THEIR FATHERS PROPERTY,THE SON'S AND DAUGHTER'S OF CONGRESS LEADERS HAVE BEEN MADE CHIEF MINISTERS OF STATES,EACH AND EVERY FAMILY MEMBER OF CONGRESS ARE ENJOYING THEIR RESPECTIVE POSTS IN (AICC) THE ONLY PERSON WHO'S FAMILY HAS BEEN LEFT OUT IS (BAPU-MAHATMA GANDHI)YES THE FAMILY MEMBERS OF BAPU HAVE BEEN CHEATED,IGNORED,TODAY'S POLITICIANS DONT CARE ABOUT THE FREEDOM FIGHTERS FAMILY,THEY ONLY KNOW TO MAKE CASH IN THEIR NAME,MOST OF THE MP/MLS OF WHOLE INDIA DONT KNOW EVEN TO SING NATIONAL ANTEM(JANA-GaNA-MANA)..THE CONGRESS GOVT EVEN DIDNT CARE TO BRING BACK BAPU'S BELONGING'S BACK FROM USA THANKS TO VIJAY MALLYA,FROM THIS INCIDENCE WE CAN GUESS THAT THE CONGRESS NOW DOSENT CARE EVEN BAPU?THEN WHAT ABOUT HIS FAMILY.ATPRESENT THE INDIAN NATION CONGRESS IS COMPLETELYCAPTURED BY CORRUPT/MAFIA POLITICIAN,WHO DONT CARE ABOUT ANYONE FROM FREEDOM MOVEMENT ERA.I KINDLY PLEASE REQUEST THE POELPE OF INDIA AND MEDIA TO FOCUS THIS ISSUE AND TAKE ACTION.OUR FIGHT IS AGAINST INDIAN NATIONAL CONGRESS TO GIVE RIGHTS TO BAPU'S FAMILY AND MAKE TUSHAR GANDHI THE VICE PRESIDENT OF (AICC)...THANK YOU...0998901114.(emmanueljohn@rediffmail.com)

Sankaralingam's picture

I am not sure whether I

I am not sure whether I should laugh or be horrified by ur ignorance and hatred. I am not a congress supporter but blaming them for everything under the sun and portraying everything as an anti hindu conspiracy shows both ur blind fanaticism and lack of understanding of hindu ideology. So, who was responsible for the godhra massacre?? aren't muslims human beings too? The fact is that muslims are severely under represented in our society and there is absolutely no basis for ur accusations. Get your facts right before u decide to spew more venom with these conspiracy theories or atleast back your statements with some evidence.

saugato Banerjee's picture

"atleast back your

"atleast back your statements with some evidence."

-have u not seen the link given at below of the article!
i wud just tell for u that open ur eyes! denying the fact is not a bliss! and for doing so , u will not be spared!

RAMAKANT  TIWARI's picture

I AM SHOCKED AND STUNNED BY

I AM SHOCKED AND STUNNED BY THIS EXPOSURE.