Sangh Parivar

We all know how partial the Indian media is because of their subservience and allegiance to their neo-colonial western masters. It is one thing to complain and it is toally another thing to take legitimate and democratic remedial measures to defeat this scourge.

Like all media companies in the private sector all over the world Indian media companies whether they are print, visual or internet based are all existing because of readers and viewers respectively. Without readers and viewers they cannot sustain their partial media coverage economically and commercially.

What the Sangh could try to do is to expose these media people without the help of any political parties simply on the basis of protecting Indian Heritage and Culture.  It should never be through coercion, force or anyother illegitimate or undemocratic means.  No one likes to see placards depicting them as Western Stooges, or Anti-national Subservients, etc etc so long as the issue is articulated properly and professionally.

Say for instance the public spirited citizens could gather peacefully in protest with placards in front of the houses and offices of the Managing Directors and Editors of media companies in India who systematically undermine Indian Civilisation, Culture and Heritage after giving them written notice with specific details of their anti-Indian cultural, heritage and civilisational aspects.  Please refer to media archives of the companies concerned and then put them as exhibits in the legal notices.

Another way is perhaps by getting in touch with vernacular media companies who do not practise such discrimination and give them all the encouragement including through subscriptions and advertisements.

If a legal notice without any threats were issued to the Cable TV association of India stating the case they might consider deleting or omitting some channels who habitually practise apartheid and untouchability against Indian Heritage and Indian Civilisation to propitiate their foreign pay masters. I am sure the Sangh activists know of many dedicated lawyers who would not surrender their integrity and professional independence for money or career or awards.

At the end of the day one has to try to create a change of mind and whilst discussing the media bias is very good the subservient Indian media habitually ignores them as they only get publicity out it without any pecuniary loss.  Beating up journalists would not create any change in their subservient mindset but only would entrench it.

It would also be a good idea to set up an Indian Heritage Foundation for the promotion, protection and propagation of Indian Heritage. It would be a great idea to discuss and receive suggestions from all. I would be honoured if I could address any concerns readers of this site have in this regard. Please remember media is what shapes public opinion about everything in the public domain and if it becomes so subservient then the majority of the readers too would become subservient endangering the Indian nation state.

I have had a few bitter experiences with the so called independent Indian media and BBC and I would volunteer those evidence at a later date. 

Jai Hind