is democracy right thing for india???
dear reader, please read the entire post before navigate to anywhere. this topic is very important. i want to go to the root of our problems.like if the car has no break, it will cause accident no matter how efficient the driver is, like that if our political structure is not the right one, we would have problems no matter how efficient the administrators are.
here i want to discuss the essential conditions for the success of democracy in a country. what are the conditions for success of democracy in a country? they are as follows.............
1]democracy succeeds in a country where people are not suffering from poverty too much because poverty keeps people uneducated, backward and timid. in India poverty is overwhelming and perhaps never ending. most of the people of India is poor, uneducated.in globalization, these people become more poor.
2]according to H.B.mayo "a democracy is unique in recognizing the political expression of such conflict as legitimate and in providing for their peaceful adjustment through the negotiation for politics, as an alternative to their settlement by force of fiat."
in other word democracy prospers in peaceful environment. it will be successful where the settlement of conflict is peaceful. in India, where Muslim terrorism is in its height, it is impossible to use democracy because the conflict of terrorism can't be settled peacefully.
3]for smooth working of democracy a free fearless and independent press is necessary, who can criticize govt. when the later is taking a wrong decision.in India there is no FREE PRESS.most of the channels are either owned by govt. or funded and supported by govt.
4] according to barker, social homogeneity and national homogeneity are two things necessary for success of democracy. this means there should be ONE SOCIETY AND ONE CULTURE in a country where democracy is successful. but in India, there are 28 different culture and belief system. in Europe there is one culture that is christian culture. that's why democracy becomes a success there. but the situation is not same in India.
5]in a democratic govt., the opposition criticize the ruling party when the later makes a wrong decision. but in India, whenever the ruling party takes a decision, the opposition criticize it no matter whether the decision is good or bad.
6] last but not the least, PEOPLE SHOULD HAVE A BELIEF IN DEMOCRACY AND THEY SHOULD KNOW WHAT DEMOCRACY IS. in india few people know what democracy is and most people don't believe in democracy.
by now dear reader, you understand why democracy is not right for india. india needs A MONARCHE WHO HAS A STRONG FAITH AND PRIDE IN THE NATION AND WHO IS NOT AFRAID TO WAGE WARS AND WHO DO NOT BEG MONEY BEFORE ANY FOREIGN STATE AND WHO IS SUPPORTED BY A STRONG AND WISE GROUP OF MINISTERS.
pls comment. i want to know your view.
- Forums:






Indian democracy has only
Indian democracy has only helped crooks to rise to political power and with power and position they have accumulated great wealth for themselves.An honest man can never win elections.Exceptions are few and that make no sense. They go unsung and un heard soon.Most of the leaders rise from street politics, dada giri, crime and after committing illegal activities. We can count on fingers who are clean and some could be from royal families. Some civil servents who are harmless and yes masters are also helped in this murky game to occupy some top positions. they are safe bets andyes masters. On their own they can never win ay election.For royal families it is dynastic succession due to slavish mentality of Indian masses. Some thrive on past laurels of by gone heroes from their families and Nehru family is one among them.It is an open fact that party tickets are given to some hoodlums, tricksters, dadas, those with criminal records, and shady characters. No one can deny this.This isindian democrayin nutshell.How can we have better governing. It trickles to lowest level.
Dr K Prabhakar Rao
Dr K Prabhakar Rao
The present democracy is a
The present democracy is a failure. It has to be modified for two party system as suggested by Dr Kalam. Army rule has not been sucessful in any part of world.It would be like going from pan to fire. Initially it may look good. But soon it would rot. See Pakistans history since inception.Democracy in India has failed because of people being morally and materially corrupt.Some one said that Indians work better when some one flogsthem.Probably they are not fit for self rule.
Dr K Prabhakar Rao
i want to say that we need a
i want to say that we need a stable govt. who will not rule for 4 or 5 years but for eternity. in democracy a govt. rule only for 4 year. then another totally opposite govt. takes up. this is a highly unstable situation. the people can't get any benefit from it. democracy produces high POLITICAL INSTABILITY. we must get rid of it.
WE HAVE ALREADY SEEN FATE OF
WE HAVE ALREADY SEEN FATE OF POWERFUL AS WELL AS WEAK MONARCHIES ALL OVER THE WORLD INCLUDING INDIA. ULTIMATELY, IT ROTS.
OUR DEMOCRACY IS BASICALLY MONARCHICAL. WE HAVE NOT YET PERFECTED IT. IT IS PREFERABLE BECAUSE THERE IS NO BETTER ALTERNATIVE. LET US HOPE FOR THE BEST.
You have written the correct
You have written the correct thing. A powerful monarchy will lead our nation to great height. I think army rule will be the best for our country.