Is it true that Muslims are peaceful people? Does BJP have an image problem? What is the fundamental problem?
Nitin Gadkari says that BJP has an image problem among Muslims. You can not help it Nitin, Muslims who read the Quran know that they are bound to be violent and have to destroy non Muslims until they accept Allah and his Messenger.
I have nothing against Muslims, Christians or anybody either. However, I can not accept this appeasement talk. I have no problem if they teach their religion to their children and leave Hindus alone to take care of their families. Instead, they want to convert, enslave and subjugate us. If they get a chance they would kill us all en masse, which is what they did wherever they went.
Muslims who read the Quran and follow the teachings therein can not disobey those teachings. Violence is essentially embedded in those teachings and in the inculcation. If anyone doubts it one should read the following verses of the Quran and the verses of Bukhari. The Quran is available on line. One does not need to buy it. Bukhari’s Hadith and Ibn Shiqab’s biography is also available on line. There are also web sites with dissection and analysis of each verse. How could anyone say that Islam is a peaceful religion and Quran advocate peace and non violence? In fact, tolerance and non violence etc are seldom mentioned in Quran. That is what I thought before I read the Quran, Ibn Shiqab’s and Bhukari’s exerpts. One should read the following verses and make one’s own analysis and judgment. They are only sample.
Qur'an (2:191-193), Qur'an (2:216), Qur'an (3:151), Qur'an (3:56), Qur'an (4:74), Qur'an (4:76), Qur'an (4:89), Qur'an (4:95), Qur'an (4:104), Qur'an (5:33), Qur'an (8:12), Qur'an (8:15), Qur'an (8:39), Qur'an (8:57), Qur'an (8:59-60), Qur'an (9:5), Qur'an (9:14), Qur'an (9:20), Qur'an (9:30), Qur'an (9:38-39), Qur'an (9:41), Qur'an (9:73), Qur'an (9:88), Qur'an (9:123), Qur'an (21:44), Qur'an (25:52), Qur'an (47:4), Qur'an (47:35), Qur'an (48:17), Qur'an (48:29), Qur'an (6, 1:4), Qur'an (61:10-12), Qur'an (66:9)
Bukhari (8:387), Bukhari (52:177), Bukhari (52:256), Bukhari (52:220),
Abu Dawud (14:2526), Abu Dawud (14:2527),
Muslim (1:33), Muslim (1:149), Muslim (20:4645), Muslim (20:4696), Muslim (19:4321-4323)
Indian Muslims would say that there was no temple at Ram Janmabhoomi. They should read the following. So they would not agree with the following either.
Al Kabaah converted by Prophet Muhammad
Later Amr ibn al-As began the practice of converting Churches and Synagouges
Church of the Apostles
Church of St John (Ummayyad Mosque Damascus) in 705 by Caliph Abdel Malik
Abbasid caliph al-Ma'mun turned many churches into mosques, both in Cairo and in Egyptian villages, which had no mosques in the earlier generations of Islam
Fatimid caliph al-Hakim converted numerous churches and synagogues into mosques.
(During the Reconquista, Christian warriors would just as often appropriate and convert mosques to churches as the Muslims would convert them to their capture.[
The chief mosque in Palermo, in Southern Italy, taken over in 830 was previously a church.)
The Great Mosque of Córdoba, in Spain began life as a church, was converted to a mosque at the time of the Muslim conquest, later reconverted into a Church
Great Mosque of Gaza - After the Crusades, several churches were turned into mosques in Palestine,
Ottoman Turks converted into mosques nearly all churches, monasteries, and chapels in Constantinople,
Hagia Sophia in 1453
Toulon Cathedral was transformed into a mosque for the 30,000 crew of the Turkish-Barbary admiral Hayreddin Barbarossa, 1543
Caliph Umar laid the foundation of Al-Aqsa mosque on the Temple Mount, the most sacred site in Judaism; Dome of the Rock,
Umar refused to pray in the Church of the Holy Sepulchre[7] for fear that later Muslims would then convert it into a mosque in spite of a treaty guaranteeing its safety, but in 1009, under Fatimid caliph Al-Hakim bi-Amr Allah, orders for the complete destruction of the Church were carried out.
The mosque of Job in Ash Shaykh Sa'd, Syria, which previously was a church of Job.
Cave of the Patriarchs, the second most holy site in Judaism, was converted into a church during the Crusades before being turned into a mosque in 1266 and henceforth banned to Jews and Christians. Part of it was restored as a synagogue after 1967 by Israel.
In 2000, during the Al-Aqsa intifada, the tomb of the Hebrew patriarch Joseph, and the yeshiva inside Od Yosef Chai, located in Nablus, was damaged by a Palestinian mob.
Zoroastrian Fire temple in Persia and other temples in Khorasan, Bhukhara and Ishtakr
some of the Greek Orthodox churches in Turkey that were left behind by expelled Greeks in 1923 were converted into mosques, and a number of synagogues were confiscated and converted to mosques after the expulsions of the Jews from Arab lands in the 1950s and 60's.
After 1974 Turkish Invasion of Cyprus. Many of the Orthodox churches in Northern Cyprus have been converted, and many are still in the process of becoming mosques
Artists' Gallery museum (by Ivan Meštrović) in Zagreb was furnished with minarets and ceded by Croats to be used as a mosque.
One should read the history of Egypt, Turkey, Iran and Arabia. All churches, synagogues and Zoroastrian temples were taken by the invading Muslims and used as Mosques.
Of course these are not my personal views, but I read them in articles and books written by reputed authors. While I read, I took notes. From my analysis and judgment I would emphasis that appeasement of Muslims is suicide. Hindus would be a minority in India in less than 40 years. Then the persecution would start. All male Hindus would be beheaded, women kidnapped from their homes and children enslaved as it is happening in Sudan, Nigeria and Pakistan. In the long run, Christians would also face the same persecution. BJP leaders can not say these words because they have to be politically correct. I am not a BJP or RSS man. So I don’t give a damn. Have you ever heard a Muslim apology for the atrocities they committed during the last 1400 years? Have you ever heard about a fatwa against jihad or Mujahiddins? Let us be real Nitin.
- Forums:








All the political parties
All the political parties are distancing from BJP quoting it as secular. Why dont the Party spokesman emphasize and clarify that they are the only party seeking uniform civil code and no seperate law for different religions. Why cant they spread the idealogy of RSS where there is no untouchability. Why cant the patriotic pulse be spread. There are some misconception on the party and the idealogy which have to be cleared strongly. All media is supportive of the UPA and all corrupt parties as they themselves are corrupt. Maybe an idea of a TV channel by RSS to educate people would help.