Modern Artists praise M.F.Hussain for his paintings. Why didn't he paint on his religion what he painted on Hindu Gods? One Hindu hatered muslim oldman cowerdly ran away from Hindustan.That is enough and he himself imposed self punishment. Now he is a Qatarian national. In near future he will realise his mistakes what he did against Hindus.He cann't live balance of his life peacefully. One cann't find Hinduastan like a country on the earth. When there were cases pending against him in the Supreme Court, how did he escape from Hindustan? Is he above law? Why didn't a red corner notice issue against him to catch? Is it failure of legal system in our country? Great great Artists and painters are in our country. They never hurt Hindus. MF Hussain is a Hindu hatered painter. One should not compare him with legendry artist and painter Piccasso.MF Hussain like persons are danger to the unity and integrity of Hindustan. He himself established as a Modern painter, why doesn't he use his creativity nude art on his religion Islam? Why didn't he paint Mohammad nudly and nude paints women of Islam? Intentionally he had choosen Hindu Gods and Goddesses for nude art to hurt Hindus. Always one should not speak of sculptures at Khajuraho. In those days that was not wrong. Time has changed humans. According to time painters have to paint. One shouldn't hurt feelings of Hindus. Hinduism is a science and it has meaning.No other religion taught like Hinduism.For that reason always Hinduism placed at high and respected by all.Those who doesn't understand Hinduism philosophy, MF Hussain like narrow minded people try to derogate feelings of Hindus. If he paints nude of Islamic people can he survive in the Arab world an hour? We,Hindustanis shouldn't allow Hindu hatered persons to express their vulgur views on Hindustan soil. |
|||
Defamation to any religion
Defamation to any religion ,region , language , sex or an individual is always shameful
jai hind , jai bharat
http://www.deepaknegi.com
http://www.deepaknegi.com/blog
@savy: again, u half cut! u
@savy: again, u half cut! u people can not differentiate sculpture & painting!
o.k. leave it! now, as far as hinduism is concerned, please note that hinduism is not a religion started by a single treacherous but it is not only a religion but also 'dharma'- fundamental duty of human what is to worship ur creator like sun, nature which were given form in different shape through the age and conception! may may at earlier age those Gods were real and existing who by their act have been God ! hinduism worships man who do good, destroy the enemies, save the humanity!hinduism is eternal, from the begining means if u do not tell someone that u r christian or muslim(circumized or baptitized), then a child is hindu as he will see the world in his eyes and will start worship who creates him means the nature!
now, before thousand thousand years , what was the need of those sculpture, we do not know ! hinduism is not depending on a incident but its' a phylosophy what change with time as per the human fundamental duty! what hinduism thought that sati daha was right before 150 years, now it is no more! like that every fundamental duty is changed by coping up the present and that's the greatness of hinduism! it allows one's freedom but not to the extent that it hurts ur sentiment!
MFH was double standard! has anybody allowed MFH to draw such painting? o.k. what he has understood , he has drawn but when there was mass objection, then he shud have apologized and destroy all his painting! he has not done it! not a single nude or derogatory painting , he made on other religion belief but only hinduism as this act was out of conspiracy to hurt hindus!
@savy: u half cut..,
@savy: u half cut.., khajuraho sculpture is not of god and goddess but of normal human being! and that's the art , not like treacherous act of hussain who made nude only hindeu god and goddess , and even his nude pasinting is including of Ma Durga who has been shown doing sex with her companion lion! just realise, if it is done with u, somebody is painting ur sister , mother or father nude and doing sex, what u wud have felt? he has also shown bharatmata as nude! is ur religion allows that?
As i said Islam do not
As i said Islam do not permit to draw nude paintings of anyone even your enemy as Islam is against pornography.
You said khajurao temple nude paintig is not of shiv and parvati but of normal human being but dont you think it is indescent to draw such things on temples??
It mean your religion allows nudity and indescncy..
@savy: again, u half cut! u
@savy: again, u half cut! u people can not differentiate sculpture & painting!
o.k. leave it! now, as far as hinduism is concerned, please note that hinduism is not a religion started by a single treacherous but it is not only a religion but also 'dharma'- fundamental duty of human what is to worship ur creator like sun, nature which were given form in different shape through the age and conception! may may at earlier age those Gods were real and existing who by their act have been God ! hinduism worships man who do good, destroy the enemies, save the humanity!hinduism is eternal, from the begining means if u do not tell someone that u r christian or muslim(circumized or baptitized), then a child is hindu as he will see the world in his eyes and will start worship who creates him means the nature!
now, before thousand thousand years , what was the need of those sculpture, we do not know ! hinduism is not depending on a incident but its' a phylosophy what change with time as per the human fundamental duty! what hinduism thought that sati daha was right before 150 years, now it is no more! like that every fundamental duty is changed by coping up the present and that's the greatness of hinduism! it allows one's freedom but not to the extent that it hurts ur sentiment!
MFH was double standard! has anybody allowed MFH to draw such painting? o.k. what he has understood , he has drawn but when there was mass objection, then he shud have apologized and destroy all his painting! he has not done it! not a single nude or derogatory painting , he made on other religion belief but only hinduism as this act was out of conspiracy to hurt hindus!
Sangh Parivar should start
Sangh Parivar should start mobilizing people through SMS/ MOBILE & bring movements which prevents these attacks on Hindus.Mass awakening required, can't keep losing political bases in important cities like delhi Mumbai.
In islam indescency is
In islam indescency is strictly prohibited even drawing hindu womens in nude is haram in Islam.
but i cannot understand why hindus are angry on husseins paintings becoz if look at khajurao temples there are all nude pantings of shiv and parvati doing sex (pornography).Will you destroy those temples.No; then why destroy the paintings.Kamasutra is a hindu culture then whats the problem.
Hussein cannot draw any thing o Islam becoz thereis nothing indescent in Islam.
Dear readers, Husseins
Dear readers,
Husseins conduct and life is the classical example of pseudo secularism practiced in india. Thanks to Gandhi and subsequent leaders who blindly follow till today there by ruining us. Hussein as a Muslim would dare not do anything that hurts Muslim sentiments. Punishmnet for such acts in Islam is simple death and nothing less. Can Islam tolerate a guy who insults Islam although it would keep quiet when similar thing is done to other faiths? Why no Islamic leader has condemned Hussein for his act that can not be forgiven.Islamic world issued a death warrant ( Fatwa) against Salman Rushdie some years ago who wrote satanic verses. We know that in past, most of the Hindu temples were destroyed by Mulsims. Defaced Hindu gods meekly look at helpless Hindus .
During Shivaji's reign, Afzal kahn the Bijapur general set out to capture Shivaji and destroyed the most holy Tulza Bhavanis idol and soon he paid for it. Shivaji was highly infuriated with this act and probabaly then and there decided to kill the wretched sinner soon. Rest is history and all know it. There are no heroes like Shivaji now. Insult to Hindu gods have to be fought in Indian courts and we know how they and the system works. Till today no action has been taken against painter ( Not artist) Hussein. Similarly, what action has been taken against Karunanidhi the CM of Tamil nadu who insulted Sri Rama on the issue of Rama sethu. These actions will not discipline those who insult Hinduism. They may need some divine punishment and probably things are in waiting. Remember what lord Krishna Said. . Dharma Samsthapanaya sambhavaami yuge yuge.... Probabaly we Hindus have to wait another incarnation of Lord Krishna to punish these wretched sinners.
Dr K Prabhakar Rao
the Supreme court has
the Supreme court has bunched all the pleas against him (all the pleas speak of the same offence, viz, insult to religious sentiments) and nominated a Delhi high court bench for disposal.
The court has never issued a summons so far against him.
is there no value of hindu sentiment in the eyes of law?
if the same wud have been happened to muslim or christian, cud court dismiss it?
IF HUSSAIN PAINT ON HIS
IF HUSSAIN PAINT ON HIS RELIGION.HE WILL BE DEAD BY NOW