Get Updates
User login
Navigation
Poll
Invite a friend
Recent Blogs
- INTO THE PAST WITH PAIN..254
- Minoritysm, politics, challenges and remedies.
- INTO THE PAST WITH PAIN..253
- OBAVVA , THE BRAVE WOMAN FROM CHITRADURGA OF KARNATAKA
- Where are the young leaders?
- The Real story of 'Jan-Gan-Man'
- INTO THE PAST WITH PAIN...252
- KELADI RANI CHENNAMMA
- CROOKS GALORE
- INTO THE PAST WITH PAIN....251
News Digest
Hindus, Hinduism, Hindusthan
Some 1400 years ago, this land India never knew what Religion was. All it knew was GOD. India then was all Gold and all GOD. There was no full stop on any belief. A worshipper of Lord Shiva was also a devotee of Lord Krishna and vice versa. The countless deities didn’t ask their followers to fight to attain any superiority. This land east of Hindukush was sometimes called as Hindusthan by those living west of Hindukush. And the majority population of this land is still called as Hindus.
The same land is here again known more popularly as India has so many Religions. One GOD of Islam is not ready to take another GOD of Hindu. One GOD of Christianity is not ready to accept another GOD of Hindu. Had there been only one GOD existing, there was surely no question of any fight, because then all would have been worshipping the same GOD probably with different name and understanding. But it is the honor of GOD to establish hatred in the heart of his followers against the followers of other GOD (more popularly called as SATAN). But GOD himself seems to be powerless to deal with SATAN once and for all. Amazing concepts of Monotheist Religions! Anyway, there would be lot to talk on GOD. Let us see what is meant by Hindus.
1400 years of history has changed this land tremendously. Over 800 years of atrocities of Islam and over 200 years of rule of Christianity changed the demography on this pure land of Sanatan believers and followers. Gold is lost. The target left is on GOD. Thousands of Vedas were burnt. The concept of GOD was attempted to be destroyed. Yet, the looters of this nation could not touch GOD. GOD showed his presence some times through Shankaracharya, and at other times through Chhatrapati Shivaji and Swami Vivekananda. The concept evolved back. The once disappearing Hindus revived their consciousness. And Bharat was formed. But this was obviously not acceptable. There emerged a great scholar and experimentalist. He claimed that he knew all Religions. He gave the mantra of ‘Sarva Dharma Samabhava’. It was well understood that the fight for Independence was a struggle of Hindus. And the experimentalist wanted Muslims to join hand. He either never knew the history, or he didn’t wanted to learn anything from it. He wanted his own fiction to come to reality. Hindus by and large are automatically in the mode of acceptance of anything that seems to be peaceful. So, ‘Sarva Dharma Samabhav’ was accepted by them. But then, ‘Sarva Dharma’ doesn’t mean Hinduism alone. Or else it would have been ‘Ekam Dharma’. ‘Sarva Dharma’ mean other Religions also. So, the experiment was carried forward in the name of Non-Cooperation movement. But there was a deal made to include ‘Sarva Dharma’ into the movement. The deal was known as ‘Khilafat movement’. But ‘Khilafat’ was ‘Ekam Dharma’, as the movement was in favor of Caliph of Turkey (not even India ). Strange, isn’t it? When our own nation was seeing huge atrocities, our ‘Sarva Dharma’ was advocating ‘Khilafat’. And the result was Mopla Rebellion, where around 10,000 Hindus were massacred by Muslims. But the experiment didn’t end. It continued. The Quran was read in Temples by the experimentalist. But Bhagwad Geeta was surely not read in any Masjid. Yet, ‘Sarva Dharma’ remained alive. ‘Ekam Dharma’ of Ali and Jinnah was fully supported by ‘Sarva Dharma’, but ‘Ekam Dharma’ of Savarkar and Godse was destroyed.
This ‘Sarva Dharma’ concept is still ruling this nation. There are nations like Nepal , Bhutan , Myamar and Sri Lanka as our neighbors. How much threat do we have from them? There is an equally small nation ‘ Bangladesh ’. Surely, our believers of ‘Sarva Dharma’ do not have any threat from them also. There is yet another nation ‘ Pakistan ’ and our ‘Sarva Dharma’ followers must also be free from any threat from it as well. The fact is, around 1.2 million Hindus were trained during Independence movement to create Indian Army. And the base of current Army is a gift of Veer Savarkar and Subhas Chandra Bose. After all, against whom our Army is deployed? Is our Army fighting against Sri Lanka , Mymmar , Bhutan or Nepal ? Obviously, the major task of Army lies against Pakistan and Bangladesh . Do you think these nations are containing people of ‘Sarva Dharma’? No, there lies ‘Ekam Dharma’ in these nations and that is Islam. And the fight of Army is undoubtedly and clearly against ‘Ekam Dharma’ Islam. If the Army does not hold the ideologies of Hinduism, will they be able to do justice to their job? I am sure, they will not. The bigger question is how are Pakistan and Bangladesh able to create terrorism in India ? If the question is answered honestly, the answer would be clearly ‘Ekam Dharma’. And the picture that will emerge is that ‘Sarva Dharma Samabhava’ is meant for Hindus alone.
Some people believe that they think only of Nation and not Religion. They are hypocrites. They will be the first to run away if there is any attack. Do they want to say that people living in the nation are all Atheists? Do they think who the enemies of the nation are? Do they think that Hinduism is the enemy of the nation? Are Hindus engaged in threatening Muslims or Christians to leave the country? How many regions do you know was evacuated by Muslims and given to pure Hindus? But there are many regions, which were evacuated by Hindus and given to Muslims. Malegaon , Achalpur, Dhole, Eastern belt of West Bengal, Assam, Tripura and the largest of all Kashmir are to name the few. If ‘Sarva Dharma’ applies so easy and appeals so deep, why don’t the believers of it go and settle in Kashmir or Malegaon ? Why did Sadhu Vasvani run away from Lahore ?
Anyway, the new name of ‘Sarva Dharma Samabhava’ is Secularism. In reality, ‘Sarva Dharma Samabhava’ or Secularism is a slap on the face of Hindus. And obviously, Hindus were taught by the founder of ‘Sarva Dharma Samabhava’ to show another side of the face to get yet another slap. So, Hindus cannot do anything for this slap.
I am sorry to say that the founder of ‘Sarva Dharma Samabhava’ could not differentiate between ‘Dharma’ and Religion. He could not differentiate between Quran and Geeta. He could not learn from history and even his own experiments. All he could do was put the tag of ‘Sarva Dharma Samabhava’ and help ‘Ekam Dharma’ to continue their atrocities on all believers of ‘Sarva Dharma’.
Let people of this country know what Bhagwad Geeta says on ‘Sarva Dharma Samabhava’.
‘Sreyan Swadharmo Vigunaha Par Dharmatswanisthitat , Swedharma Nidhanam Shreyah Par Dharma Bhayavahah’
Better is one’s own Dharma even if it is full of fault. It is better to die in own Dharma. As other’s Dharma is full of dishonor and will bring ruin to the betrayer of his own Dharma.
Lord Krishna has not advocated to what the experimentalist told and practiced. If one wants to save their nation, they must save their Dharma first. If Nation is the mother, Dharma is the Father. We can clearly see why ‘Sarva Dharma Samabhava’ was established. So the original and true father ‘Dharma’ (for India it was ‘Sanatan Dharma’) could be replaced. And you all know it is replaced now. What our Lords didn’t do, we have done and accepted. Who will protect this nation now? Mother feeds the nation, Father protects the nation. Now our Father is still under captive. And new Father is declared. We need to release or father first, if we want to save India . There is no other formula that will work. The ‘Ekam Dharma’, Hinduism or Sanatan Dharma is alone that will give peace to even Muslims and Christians. This land India is made for Saints and Rishis. If that is destroyed, I predict today, nature will devastate the whole earth. If the whole world has to exist, India must exist as a Hindu state. India must have Rishis and Munis in full swing.
If the Secularist still does not understand, let me put before them a clear meaning of Dharma. In most simple form Dharma means ‘All that you want to do with and on others, but with the condition that if same is done with and on you, you are sure that you would enjoy them equally’. So, Conversion is what Christians think is right, and if they are not ready to accept the same when applied to their community – it is Adharma. If Islam thinks looting, raping and killing Kafirs is correct and orders of GOD, then the same done on them should also be accepted with equal pleasure – or else it is Adharma. This is the philosophy of Hinduism and this is why Hinduism by default is Secular. But now, beware Hindus, you are already declared as Communal by Media and current Government. You are 80%, yet you cannot hold your Religion with pride – your face is shameful. Your choice, what you want to say: Long Live ‘Sarva Dharma Samabhava’; Long Live Secularism OR ‘Garv se Kaho Hum Hindu Hain’.
- Content Type(Ctrl+click to select more than one):
Comments
Most stupid article I have
Most stupid article I have ever read. Please get a medical/mental chack up at the earliest.
i believe only one religion
i believe only one religion hinduism.hinduism is only one greatest religion hinduism is very kind religion.this is our plus point.but any boby can hit own religion then alltogether and fight it.i am proud to be hindu
3aNPI0 ikxcmuzfumqv,
3aNPI0 ikxcmuzfumqv, [url=http://jaozceigliaf.com/]jaozceigliaf[/url], [link=http://zqnyogpdwueb.com/]zqnyogpdwueb[/link], http://qdbkiwibxote.com/
In this globalised world we
In this globalised world we are being challenged because we see that we are only a small part of it as individuals and hence we need to identify with a bigger entity like being a hindu to boast our place in the world. A similar challenge is faced by the muslims and the christians. Everybody in taking recourse to this religion-based identity, then has to practice what the religion says, or what they think it says. The Islamic terrorists have made the worst possible interpretation of Islam to justify the kind of violence they are perpetrating. The christians may talk of religion but they are mainly using the force of their better weapons and bigger money to dominate the world. This is the geo-political reality of the world.
The white man is smart enough to see when to use religion to enslave others and when to use weapons and money to do the same. There is one mafia saying - money for power and power for money, and the white man is the mafia of the world.
In India, somehow thru till the liberalisation in 1991, we had managed to avoid control by the mafia. But the rest of the third world didnt. In some way, the Islamic terrorist is fighting against the white man's mafia. It is a stupid painful way to fight and a fight which they cant really win that way.
Unfortunately, India has allied with the white man in the fight against the islamic terrorist - what with the Prime Minister hugging George Bush. And so the Islamic terrorists attack hindus, because hindus support the americans and the jews. It may be difficult for us to digest but we have become the white mans stooge who will do anything the white man says as long as he throws some scraps this way. We cant see that while some of us who catch those scraps improve our material well-being, the large number of people in the country are being more and more enslaved and oppressed. We are the dumping ground of the white mans wastes and toxins. We lose our best land, our best resources, to make t-shirts and toys for the white man. We open up our markets for the white man to make his profits. We stay up at night and sleep doing the day to take his calls and do the donkey-work for him and very cheaply.
I agree with you when you say that Islam is a meaningless religion - it is meaningless because howevermuch they may try they cannot convert nor eliminate all non-believers. It is meaningless also because they believe that they can turn the clock back and return to a past golden age and deny people what are now unalienable democratic rights. It is meaningless because it may have been progressive when it started in the 6th century A. D. but it is very much out-dated, insulting to modern values and unsuitable for the 21st century. It is meaningless because they have lost the ability to live humanely seeing only a narrow version of their religion. It is meaningless because they have lost the ability to co-exist with other people who may disagree with them and made them so pathetic that they see only enemies everywhere. The point is that they realise this.
That is why i dont believe that the Islamic terrorist can destroy us. They are trying but they cant do any but a tiny damage to us.
I would like to point out
I would like to point out some errors in the argument above so it may be improved.
It may be true that hindu thought is poly-deist, meaning that there are multiple Gods, as compared to Judaism, Christianity and Islam where there is only one deity which is generally called God. However, it is not true that all hindus believe in all hindu deities as expressed by the author in the first paragraph. I have 2 arguments regarding this.
Firstly, hindu thought thru the vedic ages onto the bhakti movement has evolved and changed. I will give a brief history as i undertand it. The vedas are comtemplative of large issues of human existence but emphasize the continuing of that contemplation without giving any specific solutions. They ascribe this role to Brahmins and assign the rest to assist them and definitely not to disturb them. By the later vedic and Upanishadic age, different schools of thought competed and the main school to arise was that of Advaita which emphasizes something which could be understood as no-God. Certain non-Brahminical schools arose like the Jain and later the Buddhist who also emphasized a no-Godness. At the same time popular hindu religion was still very deistic with diverse deities, each village with a unique deity of its own, many families with a unique kul-devta of their own. This arose initially with the rise of Tantric religion and later as part of the Bhatki movement where people wanted a direct relation with their own personal deity without the need of the Brahmin and brahminical rituals. Almost a new series of deities arose in prominence due to the effort and devotion of specific poets and singers and Gurus like Kabir, Meera Bai and many others in different parts of the sub-continent. Historically then, Shiva who is part of the vedic deities as Rudra is a much more ancient deity than Krishna who rose in prominence due to the work of Shankaracharya and such devotees as Meera Bai. To say that a devotee of Krishna is also a devotee of Shiva is a falacy in that sense.
The other argument is on the basis of diversity of communities within those that are called hindu. The large number of tribals lived and continue to live aboriginal lifestyles worshiping their own gods which the outside world has no idea about, including prominent trees, streams and hills in their region, as well as famous anscestors. The Scheduled Castes have their own deities especially because the caste-hindus didnt (dont?) allow them in their temples. Regional differences abound due to the different historical factors in different regions. So Durga is one of the most important deities in Eastern India like Bengal and Bihar, while Krishna is important in Western India like Rajasthan and Gujarat. The Shaivaite and Vaishnavite streams of hinduism are non-inclusive for many communities like the Lingayats.
Now Judaism, Christianity, Islam and Buddhism by their very concept are not compatible with any other religion or any other god. Hence, they are based on preaching and converting non-believers, with the aim of eventually converting all the people of the world. However, one should realise that we are in the 21st century. With the rise of science, the theory of evolution, genetics, quantum mechanics and cosmology, have shown that deist religions are delusional and incompatible with reality. Only a minority in the West is concerned with spreading Christianity, rather they want to impose their political and economic might on the world and exploit the third-world (in which India is, inspite of its growth and ressurgence in the last 2 decades) for their own benefit. Historically Christianity and the West has been more against Islam and right now the so-called Global War on Terror is a direct attack. And they are more interested in the oil. The hindus are inadvertently becoming a victim, almost a collateral damage, of this confict. This is not to say that the muslims did not destroy possibly thousands of temples in the Indian sub-continent especially in the first 500 years of muslim rule from Delhi and later the Deccan. (There were 2 reasons for destroying temples, firstly to loot the treasure in the temples and secondly due to the edict in Islam that idol-worship was a weakness which distracted man from the true experience of god.) This is not to say that muslims do not look at India as their enemy and an ally of the West against them.
The Mopla rebelion is regarded as a fight against British colonialism as well as Islamic revitalisation. The hindus were seen as collaborating with the British colonial authorities and this may have contributed in the conflict. It was not simply as religious conflict as the author makes it to be. The author seems to imply that if the locus of control of nothing should be outside India. Unfortunately, India is really a very small part of the whole world.
The last part of the argument is quite strange. I dont see why he wants me to die with my own dharma even if i know it has faults. I would rather try to improve myself and remove those faults which i can identify and rectify.
Islam thought that it could defeat all religions and convert all people. But they failed. Now the author seems to be saying is that if some hindu occassionally decides to kill a few muslims, he should be allowed since the hindu is so powerful and was so oppressed. The hindu is so pathetic according to him that just to feel that he has some power, he has to kill muslims and christians.
Thanks to our differences -
Thanks to our differences - The point here to be decided is:
If you want your future generations to atleast know they had HINDU ancestors then you should decide to LIVE ; To decide to LIVE means protect yourself from the KILLERs who dont need an identity since we have seen it for ages. And when someone says it from HISTORY we cant accept it.
The problem with we educated fools is that we want proof of the KILLER ; And now that all our MUSLIM friends have two ID cards - one with a HINDU name; so its difficult to take it; Thanks to our education and secularity.
Everyone will know it when the KILLER comes.. and then its too late.
Decide if you still want to live in peace or convert to islam and make your child a terrorist since to eliminate non-believers is the essence of ISLAM - the meaningless religion.
I'd prefer you use 'Arya'
I'd prefer you use 'Arya' dharma instead of 'Sanatan' dharma.