Is Left-wing Fascism the gravest threat to democrasy in India?

The barbaric attack on the security personnel by Maoists in West Bengal has brought to the fore the discussion on the threat of Left-wing extremists to the democracy in India. Prime Minister of India, Dr Manmohan Singh referring to Maoists in particular, has described the Leftist extremist movements, the  gravest threat to India's internal security[a]. These militant movements are seen to be the single biggest threat to both the democracy and human rights in India. It should be noted that other leaders of the country including Former Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajapayee, Leader of Opposition L K Advani and RSS Sarasanghachalak Mohan Bhagwat have been constantly warning the Government of the designs of Left-wing extremists in India. In a welcome change in the Government’s approach, the Home Minister P Chidambaram has targeted the hypocrisy of the sympathizers of the Left-wing extremists who otherwise make all the noises about human rights violations but maintain a deafening silence when innocent civilians are massacred by Left-wing extremists. This article provides a brief on the phenomena of Left-wing Fascists movement in India.

An Introduction

Left-wing Fascist groups in India are a set of groups based on Left ideology that have shown militant tendencies and have been part of violent incidents of massacres and sabotage in India.  These groups have been characterized by their authoritarianism, intolerance and terrorism[1].

The groups can be categorized based on those who have chosen to remain outside the democratic process and have led the armed rebellions and those who although have not actively proclaimed violent methods but have been involved in acts of violent suppressions and other human rights violations such as in Nandigram. Many of the former have been listed as the Anti-revisionist left parties of the world[2] and include Communist Party of India (Marxist-Leninist), Communist Party of India (Maoist).

Maoists

Incidents of violence by the Leftist groups have often been labeled as "Red terror" or "Red terrorism"[3]. The Left-wing extremist groups have also been compared with the [[Taliban]] with respect to their violent means[4], guerilla ideology, anti democratic movements[5] and kangaroo justice.

Violent Means

Most Leftist groups in India have proclaimed that violent struggles form the core to their ideology[6]. Prominent among them are the Maoists, who have claimed responsibility for the killings of numerous civilians and security personnel.

 Figures computed by the Ministry of Home Affairs and presented before the Parliament indicate that 4067 civilians had been killed between 2000-07 by the Leftist Extremist violence in India.

 The victims include unarmed civilians, tribal[7] women, children[8], senior citizens[9], security personnel and democratically elected representatives.

     Year              Victims of Left terror

     2000                     550

     2001                      564

     2002                      482

     2003                      513

     2004                      566

     2005                      677

     2006                      678

     2007                        37
(to 31 January 2007)

Source: computed from Ministry of Home affairs (MHA) annual reports (various years), and statement by the union minister for home affairs, Shivraj Patil, in the Lok Sabha (lower house of parliament) on 6 March 2007.

Disruption of Democracy

Maoists have been known for boycotting elections and also unleashing violence to disrupt elections in many parts across India.  They have also attacked civilians who have defied the boycott calls given by them [10].

 The Maoists have claimed responsibility for killings of prominent political leaders in Central and Southern India, most of them democratically elected. Prominent among the killings are tribal leaders Sunil Mahato[11] in Jharkhand Anup Marandi[12] . They have also routinely been involved in massacre of civilians and policemen[13]

The Asian Center for Human Rights in its report on the Maoists has reported crimes such as kidnapping and extortion by the Maoists. The Left-wing extremists are also known to use "Kangaroo Justice" trials and order the killing of captured politicians and their comrades who surrender to the security personnel[14].

Marxists

 While the Maoist groups have chosen to remain outside the democratic setup in their attempts to overthrow it, there are many other groups who have transformed into political parties and contested elections. But they too have been part of perpetrators of massacres of innocent civilians and comrades of other Leftist groups. Prominent among them are the Marxists constituted by CPI(M)

Nandigram Massacre

The Nandigram controversy started when the Marxist led Government of West Bengal decided that the Salim Group of Indonesia would set up a chemical hub under the SEZ policy at Nandigram, a rural area in the district of Purba Medinipur. The villagers and farmers whose land was to be acquired for the project resisted these attempts by the West Bengal Government. A massive attack with thousands of policeman and ruling party workers was launched by the Marxist Government to clear off the resistance. Police shooting killed 14 and injured at least 70, which included women and children. This "state sponsored" attack on the "unarmed civilians" came in for criticism as being "Fascist"[15].  

Gopal Krishna Gandhi, the then Governor of West Bengal and grandson of Mahatma Gandhi, criticized the state government over its handling of the Nandigram incident, speaking of the incident as "cold horror" in a press statement[16]

After the incident, the Government and the administration were allegedly seen openly supporting the "private army" of the ruling party and the cadre of CPI(M), in leading atrocities on the people who resisted the land acquisition. The ruling party workers are also alleged to have taken the help of local criminals mostly involved in dacoity cases for their "operation".    The Times of India reported "criminals were given money in advance and given a free-hand to bring whatever they could from the empty homes once the operation is complete. Sources said one such group that has returned to Onda came with motorcycles" looted from the resisting villagers.[17]   

Criticism also has come in from their own colleagues when Dr. Ashok Mitra, long time Finance Minister of the Government of West Bengal (and a veteran CPI(M) leader) criticized the government and his party stating that till death he will remain guilty to his conscience if he keeps mum on the happenings in Nandigram. He stated that the CPI(M) leadership was “blind of hubris and the party has turned into a wide open field of flatterers and court jesters dominated by 'anti-socials'”[18]

The Intellectual support for the violence

The divisions in the Left-wing with respect to the violence have been reflected in the intellectual circle too. Left intellectuals around the world have been known for their selective criticisms of the violence by different Leftist groups. Some have been seen openly justifying one or other form of violence.

In an article coauthored by Vijay Parshad, the George and Martha Kellner Chair of South Asian History and Director of International Studies at Trinity College, he puts the blame of the incidents squarely on the opposition parties and also calls the protest by the peasants, an  agitation derived from the "neo-rural rich"[19]

Naom Chomsky's letter

 A letter authored by Naom Chomsky, Vijay Parshad and other Marxist scholars from various Universities in the US, addressed to "Our Friends in Bengal" , at the peak of Nandigram violence read We hear from people on both sides of this chasm, and we are trying to make some sense of the events and the dynamics. Obviously, our distance prevents us from saying anything definitive. We continue to trust that the people of Bengal will not allow their differences on some issues to tear apart the important experiments in the state (land reforms, local self-government)”.[20]

Ironically, it never bothered to condemn the massacre and also ended up creating a huge rift between the left factions. The letter was seen by many rival Left factions as a justification of the violence and support to the Neo-liberalism propounded by Buddadeb Bhattacharya. Naom Chomsky among others was criticized for his hypocrisy of not condemning the violence and for siding with its perpetrators. It was also seen by many as an attempt to admonish those who had taken to streets protesting the Left front Government over the Nandigram massacare[21].

A strong response was issued by Mahashweta Devi, Arundhati Roy, Sumit Sarkar, Uma Chakravarty, Swapan Chakravorty and other Leftists activists based in India belonging to the rival group of Leftists, mostly the sympathizers of Marxists. They felt that Chomsky et al, given "their distance from events in India," had fallen prey "to a CPM public relations coup". After criticism of the letter, one of the signatories of the letter, Susan George, withdrew her signature from the letter [22], splitting wide open the divisions within the Left intellectuals.    

Support for Maoists

But ironically, many Leftist academicians and activists who have been critical about the violence in Nandigram have supported the militant movements of the Maoists and other Leftist groups.

 Arundhati Roy, a Leftist intellectual and activist, who has been critical about democracy in India, while admitting that the Maoists have been guilty of "unspeakable atrocities", views the militant movements as leading a protest with popular support and that they are fighting injustice of the Government. She says "''I have no doubt that the Maoists can be agents of terror and coercion too. I have no doubt they have committed unspeakable atrocities. I have no doubt they cannot lay claim to undisputed support from local people — but who can? Still, no guerrilla army can survive without local support. That's a logistical impossibility."[24]

The author of this white paper can be reached for feedback and comments on paramavaibhavam@gmail.com 

 References

[1]  India's Naxalites: A spectre haunting India, http://www.economist.com/world/asia/displaystory.cfm?story_id=7799247. These organizations include the different Maoist groups and some Marxists and the Marxist- Leninist groups.

[2] Leftist Parties of the World: Anti-Revisionists http://www.broadleft.org/antirevi.htm

[3] Red Terror: Six cops killed in Landmine blast in Jharkhand http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/India/Red_terror_Six_cops_killed_in_landmine_blast_in_Jharkhand/articleshow/3994905.cms

[4]  M.S.N. Menon : Maoists deserve Taliban fate http://www.businessweek.com/globalbiz/blog/eyeonasia/archives/2007/11/indias_communis.html

[5] Manjeet Kripalani : India's Communists and the Nuclear Deal http://www.tribuneindia.com/2001/20011207/edit.htm

[6] Left-wing Extremist group: Communist Party of India-Maoist (CPI-Maoist)

[7] Massacre of the innocent [http://www.hindu.com/2006/07/19/stories/2006071904991000.htm]</ref>,

[8] Maoists Kill Eight in Jharkhand http://www.thaindian.com/newsportal/world-news/maoists-kill-eight-in-jha... </ref>

[9] Naxals kill senior citizen in Gadchiroli http://news.indiainfo.com/2009/01/30/0901302034_naxals_kill_senior_citizen_in_gadchiroli.html

[10] Ehtasham Khan, In Chatra, democracy wails under Naxalism http://in.rediff.com/election/2005/feb/03khan.htm

[11] JMM MP Mahato shot dead by naxals http://www.hindu.com/2007/03/05/stories/2007030513330100.htm,

[12] Naxal attack kills Marandi's son http://www.ndtv.com/convergence/ndtv/story.aspx?id=NEWEN20070030852

[13] Maoists claim responsibility for Chhattisgarh massacre http://www.rediff.com/news/2007/mar/26maoist.htm

[14] The Naxal conflict in India: Killings down, armament up http://www.achrweb.org/Review/2006/135-06.htm

[15] Maoists own responsibility for attack on Buddhadeb http:\\www.ibnlive.in.com/news/maoists-own-responsibility-for-attack-on-buddhadeb/77713-3.html?from=rssfeed

[16] Sense of cold horror: Governor http://www.screenindia.com/news/sense-of-cold-horror-governor/25728/

[17] How CPM recaptured Nandigram  http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/How_CPM_recaptured_Nandigram/articleshow/2533801.cms

[18] You are not what you were - Ashok Mitra http://sanhati.com/articles/446/

[19] Sudhanva Deshpande and Vijay Parshad, Communism in Bengal, The Political Economy of a Crisis, [http://www.counterpunch.org/prashad05232007.html

[20]   Chomsky and other intellectuals on Nandigram, http://www.hindu.com/2007/11/22/stories/2007112255861300.htm

[21] The hypocrisy of Chomsky over Nandigram, http://indiainteracts.com/columnist/2007/11/24/The-hypocrisy-of-Chomsky-over-Nandigram/

[22] The Left is Right http://www.tehelka.com/story_main36.asp?filename=Ne081207The_Left_Is.asp

[23]  It's outright war and both sides are choosing their weapons, Arundhati Roy in conversation with Shoma Chaudhury  http://www.tehelka.com/story_main28.asp?filename=Ne310307Its_outright_CS.asp

Comments

Hary Nambiar's picture

I have great respect for Dr

I have great respect for Dr Prabhakar Rao. I also respect the concerns of the writer of this article. However, I have a little different perspective on the issue.

The interiors of Bihar, Jarkhand, Orissa, Maharashtra, Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, Tamil Nadu and Kerala are the most under developed areas in India. Mineral rich land in those areas has been in the hands of vested interests long before independence. The legality of such transfer of property is very much questionable. People in those areas have lived poor from the beginning of history and nothing has happened to improve their lives. Life in those areas is so desperate that the people who live in reasonably progressed areas who read newspapers would not even understand. They have serious problems of making hand to mouth living. If one looks at the statistics of poverty in India, one could not fail to notice that the largest number of people under poverty live in those areas. Nandigram problem arose because the Government of West Bengal acquired agricultural land for industrial uses. Even though industrialization in those areas would have yielded larger economic prosperity than using the land for agriculture, it gave politicians the weapon to incite people. Association with land is emotional to people. Possession of agricultural and is the sign of current and continuous prosperity for the families while the progress through industrialization displaces people of the land, brings in immigrant workers and makes native people dependent. So the people do have a cause for serious misgivings. Democracy and economic planning have not yielded real benefit to rural people. Rural people in India, especially those who live in the regions under discussions have a real problem. Government’s response to solve this problem has always been to kill them. What the government always did was to recruit poor unemployed youth with high school education, pay minimum wages, train them to walk left right, issue khakhi clothes, single shot vintage rifles to them and send them into areas about which they have little familiarity. It is probably possible to kill some of them and arrest their growth, but that way of dealing with the problem will only postpone the solution. If the poverty is not alleviated the problem will resurface. It will grow through generations and will spread to other areas. Other vested interests in India will take advantage of the situation and the problem will become uncontrollable. I recommend the government to talk to their leaders. They already have Kodad Ghandy in custody. He is no less important a political leader than Chidambaram or other Congress boys. Intellectuals who support the so called terrorists of the interiors are not foolish or wicked with their mind against the Indian democracy. If India is a democracy, its leaders must talk and act with democratic principles in mind. First there has to be redistribution of land. Then the setting up of more elementary schools, primary health, job training centers and rural employment schemes. Ghandy knows the problem. I am sure that he would also have some solutions in mind. This problem should be looked at from an economic development perspective than from a domestic security point of view. If the government does that, this problem could be solved for ever. Otherwise it will become a “Maoist” problem. It is an Indian problem and it has to be solved using Indian mind. I don’t believe that the Indian mind approves large scale killing as solutions to the problems.

Dr K Prabhakar Rao's picture

Dear readers, Left wing

Dear readers,

Left wing terrorism no doubt is a major threat to democracy any where in the world. In fact Communism has follwing dangerous characteristics that makes it against democracy;-

1. Communism recommends nationalisation of all means of production ie all means of production can not be owned by individuas. this is the first and fore most one that makes it at cross with capitalists who thrive in democracy.They thrive on blood of workers.
2.Communism plans for eqaul distribution of wealth.
3.Dictatorship of prolitariat will be established in communism.
4. They aso believe that power flows through barrel of Gun ( Now by Maoists and Leninists openly)

In India, Maoists have been waging war with govt from 1948 onwards when in Telangana in AP state ( Nizam statae) they resorted to armed rebellion that was later on crushed by Indian army under MajGen Chaudhry after Police action on Hyderabad state in 1948 when military governmnet in Hyderabad was proclaimed. There was again great uprising in 1969 in sri kakulam and Parvateepuram in coastal AP that was crushed by Jalagam Venkat Rao the CM. Since then Naxals have been waging war regualrly. They were mostly crushed in the recent times when Swarnjit sen was the DGP of the state. They mostly lost the cadres and are lying low. However they made Bihar, Chattisgarh and Jharkhand as their bastions. Orissa and Eastern Maharashtra bordering AP are also their very strong areas that are engulfed by Dandakaranyam forests. With division of MP and Bihar Naxals established strong areas and influence in Chattisgarh and Jharkhand and are fighting open battles with poilce forces. These small states do not have resources and sought central help. Naxals almost linked right from Tamil nadu to Nepal via esatern India that was a straegic plan. Unless co ordinated efforts are made by all state governments, eradication of Naxalites is difficult. However upliftment of poor is most imporatnt if Naxalism is to be eradicated. The present corrupt governmnets have no will to change the lives of poor in spirits and action.Communists are always threat to democracy.

Dr K Prabhakar Rao

The above are the most imporatntones and democracy is agisnt suchtheory