We have been told that terror has no religion. Repeatedly. Sun liya bhai, kitni baar bataoge.
Yet, news media, Congress party and even the government were repeating "Hindu terrorism" ad nauseam.
At the same time, we have the very same news media, Congress and the lame-duck Madmoron government not even mentioning "Islamic terrorism" for what it was in Mumbai recently. Nobody is calling the Jehadis in Mumbai "terrorists". Even "militant" seems to be used grudgingly. In fact, they even seem to be shy and apologetic of mentioning Pakistani involvement in the terror attacks. Why would anyone else in the world believe it when even our own pseudo-secular government and public does not want to admit it? Pakistan has gone all over the world media proclaiming their innocence and even blaming Hindus and Israel for the terror attacks. Pakistan has already won the war when we have our own citizens rooting for them. Now its just a matter of time when Hindus like us are destroyed. The conquest of India would be complete. They dont even have to use nuclear weapons. They can just keep sending in terrorists like in Mumbai. They can even get lot of local help from Muslims and the dhimmis in India.
Here, I am afraid to move out into the streets, while I see muslims celebrating in their ghettos, strutting around unhurt and unafraid. Recently I saw a muslim arguing with a havaldar on the streets a day after the attacks. The cop asked the muslim to take his handcart aside and stop blocking the traffic. The muslim instead started abusing the cop. I cant even imagine arguing with a cop (leave alone abusing), lest I want to be caught in a Nehruvian-Stalinist bureaucratic byzantine maze for years and pay random fines. We continue to live in fear of being killed or jailed anytime, while muslims in India indulge in jehadi terrorism freely (or provide support to Jehadis from enemy countries).
Oh, I repeat - Terror has no religion.
Sunday, November 30, 2008
Kristol on Patriotism
Bill Kristol defends the concept of patriotism, which seems to have become a dirty word in the 21st century. I'm surprised a newspaper with NYT's leanings gave him space to write that.
what to do next
since everyone and his uncle is offering an opinion - here goes
I don't know why we keep crying Uncle Sam and running to America. As B Raman has noted elsewhere - this is futile. America is not interested in wiping terror aimed at india. they are looking for a facing-saving withdrawal from Afghanistan. what happened in iraq is going to be repeated here. petraeus has already started bribing the taliban to stop firing at NATO "troops" so that they can "Declare Victory and run" - to paraphrase the memorable George Aiken.
lesson -1 Do not look to others to do your Karma; specially do not look to losers
some bloggers have proposed troops to afghanistan. this is not only error but folly, principally because this will ensure quick NATO withdrawl with India left holding the bag of doggy-poop that the Afghan nation has become - not to mention the "offence" it will cause to peace-loving minorities and the Jamia University in India. We should be sending all the troops we can to the north-east. the hans are going to attack - they are softening us up using pakistan on the western border. Our strategy should be use Tajik-Uzbek-Iran trio to keep the pressure on Pakistan in the Afghan theatre.
lesson -2 Do not go climbing on someone else's Hamburger Hill.
we should recognise that both the Yanks and Chinese have an interest in keeping Pakistan going - so as to keep a watch on what each other is doing in Central Asia. Pakistan is not an international condom - it is a whore (I said it). This whore has two pimps. what is more the whore keeps playing one pimp against the other while pretending to work for both.
the core indian strategy should be to get Pakistanis fighting each other - and make sure it stays that way. We should fund the baluchis, sindhis and both sides of the Durand-line Pakhtoons to achieve their legitimate aspirations. If they do one Kashmir to us - we should do four Kashmir's to them. Instead of manning 100,000 troops on the western border - we should be paying "militants" within Pakistan to blow up critical installations (bridges, ports, army barracks). Specially they should blow up things that chinese engineers are working on - and also terror-training camps. Break up Pakistan - do it all with plausible deniability. we should also harden our defenses with the knowledge that some attacks are inevitable.
this should be a strategic objective that we should work for - even if it takes many years. even if we have to - to quote Papa Bhutto - "eat grass"
if we break up Pakistan - it opens up an energy corridor between us and the middle east. it undermines both uncle sam and the hans - to the gain of India. we should lie to uncle sam that we are prepared to be his client after this happens (a little al-taqqiyah of our own). we can even drop the demand of reconsidering the nuclear deal as a gesture
the mantra is - strengthen defense and start an offense
finally - i am simply appalled by Chidambaram being handed the home ministry. was it not enough for him to wreck the indian economy with money-for-sonia schemes like NREGS or money-for-Kingini schemes like allowing-disallowing- reallowing p-notes. the growth projections have already been lowered to be close to 7% (govt. of Manmohan statistics - you can give that a 2-3% haircut). now we can get ready to hand over parcels of india to various parties. Bangladesh gets the North east, Nepal gets it's Pasupati-Tirupatti corridor and kashmir can be given away to Zardari. all this will be done while giving the appearance of a wise Buddha and waving a "peace in our time" paper. i am afraid it may be curtains for our modern state (The First Republic of India - as Jerry Rao calls it)
so the first step should be to give this portfolio to somebody else.
sigh!
I don't know why we keep crying Uncle Sam and running to America. As B Raman has noted elsewhere - this is futile. America is not interested in wiping terror aimed at india. they are looking for a facing-saving withdrawal from Afghanistan. what happened in iraq is going to be repeated here. petraeus has already started bribing the taliban to stop firing at NATO "troops" so that they can "Declare Victory and run" - to paraphrase the memorable George Aiken.
lesson -1 Do not look to others to do your Karma; specially do not look to losers
some bloggers have proposed troops to afghanistan. this is not only error but folly, principally because this will ensure quick NATO withdrawl with India left holding the bag of doggy-poop that the Afghan nation has become - not to mention the "offence" it will cause to peace-loving minorities and the Jamia University in India. We should be sending all the troops we can to the north-east. the hans are going to attack - they are softening us up using pakistan on the western border. Our strategy should be use Tajik-Uzbek-Iran trio to keep the pressure on Pakistan in the Afghan theatre.
lesson -2 Do not go climbing on someone else's Hamburger Hill.
we should recognise that both the Yanks and Chinese have an interest in keeping Pakistan going - so as to keep a watch on what each other is doing in Central Asia. Pakistan is not an international condom - it is a whore (I said it). This whore has two pimps. what is more the whore keeps playing one pimp against the other while pretending to work for both.
the core indian strategy should be to get Pakistanis fighting each other - and make sure it stays that way. We should fund the baluchis, sindhis and both sides of the Durand-line Pakhtoons to achieve their legitimate aspirations. If they do one Kashmir to us - we should do four Kashmir's to them. Instead of manning 100,000 troops on the western border - we should be paying "militants" within Pakistan to blow up critical installations (bridges, ports, army barracks). Specially they should blow up things that chinese engineers are working on - and also terror-training camps. Break up Pakistan - do it all with plausible deniability. we should also harden our defenses with the knowledge that some attacks are inevitable.
this should be a strategic objective that we should work for - even if it takes many years. even if we have to - to quote Papa Bhutto - "eat grass"
if we break up Pakistan - it opens up an energy corridor between us and the middle east. it undermines both uncle sam and the hans - to the gain of India. we should lie to uncle sam that we are prepared to be his client after this happens (a little al-taqqiyah of our own). we can even drop the demand of reconsidering the nuclear deal as a gesture
the mantra is - strengthen defense and start an offense
finally - i am simply appalled by Chidambaram being handed the home ministry. was it not enough for him to wreck the indian economy with money-for-sonia schemes like NREGS or money-for-Kingini schemes like allowing-disallowing- reallowing p-notes. the growth projections have already been lowered to be close to 7% (govt. of Manmohan statistics - you can give that a 2-3% haircut). now we can get ready to hand over parcels of india to various parties. Bangladesh gets the North east, Nepal gets it's Pasupati-Tirupatti corridor and kashmir can be given away to Zardari. all this will be done while giving the appearance of a wise Buddha and waving a "peace in our time" paper. i am afraid it may be curtains for our modern state (The First Republic of India - as Jerry Rao calls it)
so the first step should be to give this portfolio to somebody else.
sigh!
Chidambaram to replace Patil
Oh, great -( Dhimmi Patil should never have been entrusted with the Union Home ministry in the first place. Ideally, an incompetent and obnoxious jerk like him would not even be put in charge of a small town's municipal authority.
To add insult to injury, the brute presided over the enfeeblement of the nation
at a crucial point in the history of Jihad.
Chidambaram is the same fascist "economist" who implemented SHARIA banking, coerced nationalised banks to make non-recoverable loans to Mohammedans and increased the Haj subsidy.
What expertise could this knave possibly bring to bear in reinforcing national security? Except, perhaps speaking slightly better English than Shivraj Patil?
To add insult to injury, the brute presided over the enfeeblement of the nation
at a crucial point in the history of Jihad.
Chidambaram is the same fascist "economist" who implemented SHARIA banking, coerced nationalised banks to make non-recoverable loans to Mohammedans and increased the Haj subsidy.
What expertise could this knave possibly bring to bear in reinforcing national security? Except, perhaps speaking slightly better English than Shivraj Patil?
Unnikrishan's Dad Tells Kerala CM to Scram
Mr Unnikrishnan Sr, father of the slain major, firmly told the visiting Kerala CM that he did not want to meet with him. (I'm told his exact words were: "Get lost, you dirty dog!")
Was Atchutanandan expecting a Lal Salaam?
The Why, and the Way Forward
According to Paki journalist Ahmed Rashid, Al-Qaeda is the prime sponsor of these attacks, because it hopes to provoke India into a military buildup on the Pakistan border. This would in turn force Pak to deploy its troops on that border, by diverting them away from the northern areas of their country. With military pressure taken off Taliban and Al-Qaeda, this would allow them to have free run of the tribal northern areas of Pakistan.
Personally, I'm not sure that Pakistan's govt would be some innocent victim of circumstances in all of this. I feel that Islamabad/Rawalpindi are quite capable of colluding with Al-Qaeda in such an agenda, because Pak Army/ISI would rather face off against us than continue fighting fratricidally against its jihadi children. They feel their nukes would effectively deter us from crossing the border anyway. So it's a safe gamble for them, especially since they know there's another indecisive wimp named Singh in charge in New Delhi. As proof, notice how Pakistan has been very quick to warn its Western patrons that it may have to rush troops to the Indian border. We haven't even yet made the slightest move to mass our troops on the border, but Pakistan is already making a case for redeploying its forces.
I feel we have to respond to these attacks, but we'd better not just do another Operation Parakram like the last time, which turned out to be a damp squib with us having to back down yet again.
What options do we have?
We could put pressure on the Americans, telling them that if they don't put pressure on Pakistan then we will (ie. by massing our troops on the Pak border, with the aforementioned consequences for the US-led war on Taliban/AlQaeda). We can't be a party to a lop-sided War on Terror, where we're all collaborating to ensure US soil is kept safe, while our own cities are left open to the wolves.
We can ask for more US backing in further closures of the sluice gates on Baglihar Dam (The US has the dominant role in the World Bank, which is the guarantor on the water-sharing agreement.) If Pakistan wants to burn down Mumbai, then we can turn Lahore into a desert.
Another thing we could do, but only after careful consideration of the pitfalls, might be to deploy Indian troops to Northern Afghanistan, since we could free up NATO troops to go southward to fight Taliban. This would have the effect of stepping up pressure on Al-Qaeda/Taliban instead of relieving it. We would then concentrate on building more roads and infrastructure for the North, to strengthen it in the likely event of a US withdrawal/retreat from Afghanistan. This would place the non-Pashtun North in a better position, once Afghan political unity breaks down and the country returns to civil war. By supporting the Tajiks and Uzbeks in the north against the inevitable Talib-dominated south, as in the past, we would re-crystallize the ethnic tectonic blocs that would revive Pashtun nationalism. The Pashtunistan issue could put Pak back on the ropes again.
Saturday, November 29, 2008
homage to a courageous hero
Ham bhi bach sakte the ghar pe reh kar,
Ham ko bhi maan baap ne paala tha dukh seh seh kar.
- Pandit Ram Prasad Bismil
I too could have stayed at home,
to bask in the warmth of safety's soft glow.
for my parents suffered to raise me
like yours- they too endured life's blows
(rough translation)
....and now they have suffered the most cruel blow of all
Farooq Abdullah DEFENDS Pakistan
JAMMU: At a time when there was mounting evidence that the attack on Mumbai was launched from Pakistani soil, former J&K CM Farooq Abdullah on Saturday sprang in defence of Pakistan, ruling out Islamabad's complicity. Instead, he suggested the two countries come together to fight terrorism .
Yes, the "PEACE PROCESS" is sacrosanct and inviolable. There should be more "PEOPLE TO PEOPLE CONTACT", more "CROSS BORDER TRADE" and new routes for those Bus Yatras to the "Land of the pure".
No sir, mere candle light vigils at the border, Cricket matches and Bollywood Bhai-Bhai romanticism just don't cut it anymore.
What "Politicisation" of terrorism?
The psecs have been criticising Narendra Modi for visiting the new Ground Zero of the Jihad against India, accusing him of "politicising" the issue of terrorism. Rather ironic coming from the perpetual arch capitulationist facilitators of Jihad for the appeasement of their "Minority" vote bank.
Even in the immediate instance, why should Narendra Modi NOT visit Mumbai to make a show of support for the security forces, when the Dhimmi Kaangress governments both at the Centre and State exhibited the usual lack of leadership and testosterone?
Has Article 370 been extended to cover Mumbai in addition to Kashmir now, that Hindus are prohibited from going there?
Didn't the Shroud of Turin accompany Manmohan Singh on his visit?
What is her official status in the government of India? None. It is the Kaangress that is guilty of politicising the terrorist attacks on Mumbai by dispatching the Kaangress party president on a political showboating mission.
If the Vatican's regent can go anywhere in India at will, with absolutely no regard for the sensitivity of the situation, surely the democratically elected Chief Minister of a neighbouring state has every right to do so.
Excellent article by Kanchan Gupta in The Pioneer blowing the psec hypocrisy on "politicisation of terror" to smithereens.
Even in the immediate instance, why should Narendra Modi NOT visit Mumbai to make a show of support for the security forces, when the Dhimmi Kaangress governments both at the Centre and State exhibited the usual lack of leadership and testosterone?
Has Article 370 been extended to cover Mumbai in addition to Kashmir now, that Hindus are prohibited from going there?
Didn't the Shroud of Turin accompany Manmohan Singh on his visit?
What is her official status in the government of India? None. It is the Kaangress that is guilty of politicising the terrorist attacks on Mumbai by dispatching the Kaangress party president on a political showboating mission.
If the Vatican's regent can go anywhere in India at will, with absolutely no regard for the sensitivity of the situation, surely the democratically elected Chief Minister of a neighbouring state has every right to do so.
Excellent article by Kanchan Gupta in The Pioneer blowing the psec hypocrisy on "politicisation of terror" to smithereens.
Mehbooba Mufti demands security for Kashmiri emporia
The Kashmiri Jihad masterminds, the bloody Abdullahs and the Muftis have piggybacked on the UPA's pogrom against Hindu nationalists to launch an attack on all those who question their Jihadi credentials. These ghouls had recently accused former Jammu & Kashmir Governor, S.K Sinha of being linked with "Hindu terrorists".
Is it not bad enough that these blood sucking vampires who feed on Hindu blood are provided Z plus category security by the NSG Black Cat commandos?
Let me see, now why does the nation owe these Jihadi scum anything? Citizens from the rest of the country are disallowed legally from owning property in Kashmir. The tiny Hindu minority is cleansed from Kashmir by a bloody genocide, thousands of Hindus continue to live in sub-human conditions in refugee camps till date and are denied basic human rights such as health care, nutrition and religious freedom. All in the name of "AUTONOMY", "SELF DETERMINATION" and "SECULARISM"
Kashmiri Mohammedans carried out a large scale seditious Intifadah in protest against the grant of a mere 40 acres of land for erecting temporary structures for the welfare of Amarnath pilgrims and have repeatedly attacked Hindu pilgrims and tourists visiting Kashmir.
Yet, these same Kashmiri Mohammedans live freely and unmolested across India, merrily enjoying the freedom that they deny to Hindus in Kashmir. They also abuse the Hindu tolerance to further indulge in espionage, terrorist recruitment and insurgent activity.
And Mehbooba Mufti has the audacity to DEMAND SECURITY FOR KASHMIRI MOHAMMEDANS?
Is it not bad enough that these blood sucking vampires who feed on Hindu blood are provided Z plus category security by the NSG Black Cat commandos?
Let me see, now why does the nation owe these Jihadi scum anything? Citizens from the rest of the country are disallowed legally from owning property in Kashmir. The tiny Hindu minority is cleansed from Kashmir by a bloody genocide, thousands of Hindus continue to live in sub-human conditions in refugee camps till date and are denied basic human rights such as health care, nutrition and religious freedom. All in the name of "AUTONOMY", "SELF DETERMINATION" and "SECULARISM"
Kashmiri Mohammedans carried out a large scale seditious Intifadah in protest against the grant of a mere 40 acres of land for erecting temporary structures for the welfare of Amarnath pilgrims and have repeatedly attacked Hindu pilgrims and tourists visiting Kashmir.
Yet, these same Kashmiri Mohammedans live freely and unmolested across India, merrily enjoying the freedom that they deny to Hindus in Kashmir. They also abuse the Hindu tolerance to further indulge in espionage, terrorist recruitment and insurgent activity.
And Mehbooba Mufti has the audacity to DEMAND SECURITY FOR KASHMIRI MOHAMMEDANS?
Srinagar, Nov 29: Following attacks in Mumbai, Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) President Mahbooba Mufti Saturday urged New Delhi to ensure security of Kashmiris living in different Indian states.
Addressing public gatherings at Budgam and Beerwah, Mufti said: “Kashmiris living outside should not be targeted.”
However she was quick on to add that “terror should be condemned strongly.”
Mufti said a particular community should not be targeted at a place where terror attacks occur.
She said concrete steps should be taken to ensure security arrangements for Kashmiris staying there.
Mufti said Kashmiri businessmen and students outside the State are engaged in the profession and added that nobody should harass them.
Informing that investigations into the Malegon blasts and Samjauta Express had changed the situation, Mufti said Hindu extremists group have been exposed as they have been directly found to be the mastermind of many terrorist incidents in India.
She said it would endanger the country’s security.
Mufti said instead of blaming each other, India and Pakistan should unite and together uproot the menace of terrorism from South Asia. She said this would help create peaceful environment in the subcontinent.
She stressed that peace would not return to the subcontinent until the leadership of India and Pakistan would take bold decisions.
LOL: Kaangress says zero tolerance the only answer
LOL - what about Manmohan Singh's famous statement regarding "Zero tolerance for 'human rights violations', Making Borders irrelevant" then?
Even at this grim juncture, the Kaangress windbags are ambiguous in their statement.
There is no unequivocal declaration of zero tolerance for terrorism, leave alone a forthright acknowledgement of Jihad representing an existential crisis for India.
The reader is left to speculate what exactly the windbags are alluding to? Zero tolerance for precisely what, huh? I suspect the "SECULAR" fascists really mean a Zero tolerance of patriotism, Hindu nationalism and a Zero tolerance of Hinduism itself - and will use this as an opportunity to peddle their sinister agenda of Hindu holocaust even more aggressively during the next few months.
Even at this grim juncture, the Kaangress windbags are ambiguous in their statement.
There is no unequivocal declaration of zero tolerance for terrorism, leave alone a forthright acknowledgement of Jihad representing an existential crisis for India.
The reader is left to speculate what exactly the windbags are alluding to? Zero tolerance for precisely what, huh? I suspect the "SECULAR" fascists really mean a Zero tolerance of patriotism, Hindu nationalism and a Zero tolerance of Hinduism itself - and will use this as an opportunity to peddle their sinister agenda of Hindu holocaust even more aggressively during the next few months.
New Delhi (IANS): Zero tolerance is the only answer to terrorism, the Congress party said on Saturday in the aftermath of the Mumbai terrorist attacks, calling upon Pakistan to honour its promise not to let its territory be used for such strikes against India.
Zero tolerance is the only answer to terrorism, the Congress Working Committee, the party's highest decision-making group, said in a resolution at its Saturday night meeting here, hours after the terror strike in Mumbai was put an end to.
five helped mumbai terrorists
since it is now confirmed that these 'militants' were actually 'terrorists' and also since only hindus are terrorists/help terrorists - ergo - five hindus helped the terrorists
they were wearing the same sacred hindu threads as the blighter in the photograph and specifically pointed out Karkare to avenge the Sadhvi's treatment
Mumbai locals helped us, terrorist tells cops-
time for susan arundhati, shabana-javed, teesta, the pervert anand jon's family - all wagah candle lighters and other such to crawl out of the woodwork
they were wearing the same sacred hindu threads as the blighter in the photograph and specifically pointed out Karkare to avenge the Sadhvi's treatment
Mumbai locals helped us, terrorist tells cops-
time for susan arundhati, shabana-javed, teesta, the pervert anand jon's family - all wagah candle lighters and other such to crawl out of the woodwork
Friday, November 28, 2008
FT Alleges Terrorists Were Hindus
The Financial Times of UK insists that this terrorist atrocity might have been a "false flag" attack staged by local Hindus to frame Muslims. Read their article:
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/b77572d0-bcbc-11dd-af5a-0000779fd18c.html
I was totally stunned and horrified by their blatant fabrication. Talk about tinfoil hats! This is just like those idiots who insist that the Israeli embassy warned all Jews to stay home on 9/11, or that CIA timer-chargers brought the Twin Towers down. But this is the Financial Times peddling this crap! What slimy journalism from those with an Atlanticist bent.
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/b77572d0-bcbc-11dd-af5a-0000779fd18c.html
I was totally stunned and horrified by their blatant fabrication. Talk about tinfoil hats! This is just like those idiots who insist that the Israeli embassy warned all Jews to stay home on 9/11, or that CIA timer-chargers brought the Twin Towers down. But this is the Financial Times peddling this crap! What slimy journalism from those with an Atlanticist bent.
Hijackers vs Hemant Karkare
The left-dominated media are quickly lionizing Hemant Karkare for their own predatory political reasons: Malegaon.
I agree that Karkare deserves our undying gratitude for his sacrifice in the line of duty. But I think the leftist media is really more interested in using Karkare's memory as their trojan horse to pillory the BJP and the political right.
They don't seem to be mentioning the deaths of his colleagues Vijay Salaskar and Ashok Kamte. They all deserve to be remembered equally, and not one above the others. They also don't seem to acknowledge Karkare's role in fighting the Naxalites. It's important that the Left not be allowed to hijack Karkare's name for their own political games.
Mumbai - China's pearl necklace
interesting items recovered from the 'militants' included
- A Mauritius national's identity card .......
- Chinese made hand grenades
http://www.thestatesman.net/page.news.php?clid=2&theme=&usrsess=1&id=233295
this is the softening up, War Lite version of the Hans soon to come full frontal assault. maldives has become the latest pearl in the necklace. this piece of reporting in the Chindu is worth reading too (you can set aside the anti-modi animus - as Rajeev says even that brigand EMS had his uses)
http://www.hindu.com/2008/11/29/stories/2008112953970800.htm
remember the human rights-wallahs staging all those breast beating rallies to protect the hijacked lives during Kandahar - wonder why there were no banshees on the roads throwing hissy fits this time ................
- A Mauritius national's identity card .......
- Chinese made hand grenades
http://www.thestatesman.net/page.news.php?clid=2&theme=&usrsess=1&id=233295
this is the softening up, War Lite version of the Hans soon to come full frontal assault. maldives has become the latest pearl in the necklace. this piece of reporting in the Chindu is worth reading too (you can set aside the anti-modi animus - as Rajeev says even that brigand EMS had his uses)
http://www.hindu.com/2008/11/29/stories/2008112953970800.htm
remember the human rights-wallahs staging all those breast beating rallies to protect the hijacked lives during Kandahar - wonder why there were no banshees on the roads throwing hissy fits this time ................
Pakistan to Manmohan - UP YOURS
figures - now that there is good evidence - including satellite phone records and Amarsinh Solanki's body in the fishing boat Kuber
Pak's U-turn: ISI chief's visit to India canceled
Now Manmohan can have Biriyani with a junior ISI bearded Mullah - with Madam in attendance, no doubt.
Pak's U-turn: ISI chief's visit to India canceled
Now Manmohan can have Biriyani with a junior ISI bearded Mullah - with Madam in attendance, no doubt.
confirmed - italians and mohammedans were spared
as written by Nizhal Yoddha yesterday - all Italians (hence related to Sonia and her Kingini Kuttan) and Mohammedans (hence 'comrades' for the poor, jobless and innocent gunmen) were spared in the attack on Mumbai
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/3766609.cms
this confirms that the scum have a deal with the p-secs whereby they will spare any italians, mohammedans and also all p-sec crypto-mohammedans
as a survival strategy - it may be useful to learn the Mohammedan prayer (including time of day it is performed) along with the associated movements. Also handy woud be a quick make-up kit - to tinge the forehead a slight color of grey when taken captive (this shows piety - the constant touching of the forehead on the prayer stone causing the skin to blacken)
practice a little reverse al-taqiyah - eh!
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/3766609.cms
this confirms that the scum have a deal with the p-secs whereby they will spare any italians, mohammedans and also all p-sec crypto-mohammedans
as a survival strategy - it may be useful to learn the Mohammedan prayer (including time of day it is performed) along with the associated movements. Also handy woud be a quick make-up kit - to tinge the forehead a slight color of grey when taken captive (this shows piety - the constant touching of the forehead on the prayer stone causing the skin to blacken)
practice a little reverse al-taqiyah - eh!
Note to Militant Sengupta by NYT reader
From the comments appended to the story
"Would it be so terrible to call these animals terrorists? If these are not terrorists then what is? The term militants implies an act of war with a strategic purpose. it legitimizes the perpetrator. Would anybody dare call the 9-11 highjackers 'militants'? Lets stop with the orwellian newspeak and call it what it is!!!!
— michael, nyc"
Indian Forces Battle Pockets of Militants - Readers' Comments - NYTimes.com
I guess even NYC living, NYT-reading folks can only take so much tripe!
"Would it be so terrible to call these animals terrorists? If these are not terrorists then what is? The term militants implies an act of war with a strategic purpose. it legitimizes the perpetrator. Would anybody dare call the 9-11 highjackers 'militants'? Lets stop with the orwellian newspeak and call it what it is!!!!
— michael, nyc"
Indian Forces Battle Pockets of Militants - Readers' Comments - NYTimes.com
I guess even NYC living, NYT-reading folks can only take so much tripe!
US intelligence expert says Patil is incompetent
nov 28th, 2008
patil's tailor would be most offended to hear this. he is, after all, renowned for sartorial splendor.
patil's tailor would be most offended to hear this. he is, after all, renowned for sartorial splendor.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: R
From: R
http://www.rediff.com///news/2008/nov/28mumterror-shivraj-patil-is-incompetent.htm
US intelligence expert says Patil is incompetent
Aziz Haniffa in Washington, DC | November 28, 2008 | 11:28 IST
Walter Andersen, a former senior Administration official, who headed up the State Department's South Asia Division of the Intelligence and Research Bureau has said the Mumbai terrorist attacks showed clearly a failure of India's intelligence and security apparatus and also the utter incompetence of Home Minister Shivraj Patil.
... deletedIndia, Jihad's Permanent Battleground
nov 28th, 2008
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Shahryar
From: Shahryar
India, Jihad's Permanent BattlegroundChronicles Magazine November 28 2008 By Srdja Trifkovic Teams of heavily armed terrorists carried out seven coordinated attacks in India's financial capital "Mumbai" (Bombay) on Wednesday evening and early Thursday morning. Over 120 people were reported killed by Friday morning and over 300 wounded, with the final toll likely to rise once the ongoing hostage crisis is ended. Similar attacks by Islamic terrorists occur with grim regularity in India (see Timetable at the end). The disputed province of Kashmir notwithstanding, militant Islam sees the second most populous country in the world as a piece of "unfinished business": having been ruled by Muslims once, it cannot legitimately revert to Dar al-Harb. The attacks represent a massive intelligence failure on part of the government in New Delhi. Even India's business capital is now seen as a soft target for Jihadist terror, yet the ruling Congress Party continues its old habit of minority appeasement and automatic insistence that the problem is confined to an unrepresentative extremist fringe aided from abroad (i.e. Pakistan). This attitude indicates common ideological roots of India's political and media elite and its Western role model. Both are supine, secularist and leftist to boot. Now that the jihadists have targeted two luxury hotels and a top-tier restaurant frequented by visiting foreigners, now that they have brought their holy war to India's upper crust and their Western business partners, the country's elite class should wake up to the fact that India has a Muslim problem. That problem is fundamentally the same in each and every country in the world with a substantial Muslim minority. It would be there even if the government in Islamabad and its semi-rogue agencies like the ISI were to terminate all support for Islamic terrorist groups active across the Subcontinent (which will never happen, of course). The attacks remind us that global Jihad has India in its sights, no less firmly today than in the early centuries of the expansion of Islam's bloody borders. Prior to the Muslim invasions which started in the 8th century India was one of the world's great civilizations. It matched its contemporaries in the realms of philosophy, mathematics, and natural science. It was a richly imaginative culture, one of the half-dozen most advanced civilizations of all time. Its sculptures were vigorous and sensual, its architecture ornate and spellbinding. Muslim invaders began entering India in the early eighth century, on the orders of Hajjaj, the governor of Iraq. Starting in 712 the raiders, commanded by Muhammad Qasim, demolished temples, shattered sculptures, plundered palaces, killed vast numbers of men—it took them three days to slaughter the inhabitants of the port city of Debal—and carried off their women and children to slavery. After the initial wave of violence, however, Qasim tried to establish law and order in the newly conquered lands, and to that end he even allowed a degree of religious tolerance. Upon hearing of such practices, his superior, Hajjaj, wrote back:
In a subsequent communication, Hajjaj reiterated that all able-bodied men were to be killed, and that their underage sons and daughters were to be enslaved. Qasim obeyed, and, on his arrival at the town of Brahminabad, massacred thousands of men. Qasim's early exploits were continued in the early eleventh century, when Mahmud of Ghazni "passed through India like a whirlwind, destroying, pillaging, and massacring," zealously following the Kuranic injunctions to kill idolaters, whom he had vowed to chastise every year of his life. In the course of seventeen invasions, in the words of Alberuni, the scholar brought by Mahmud to India, Mahmud utterly ruined the prosperity of the country and performed there wonderful exploits, by which the Hindus became like atoms of dust scattered in all directions, and like a tale of old in the mouth of the people. Their scattered remains cherish, of course, the most inveterate aversion toward all Muslims. In the aftermath of the invasion, in the ancient cities of Varanasi, Mathura, Ujjain, Maheshwar, Jwalamukhi, and Dwarka, not one temple survived whole and intact. In his The Story of Civilization, Will Durant lamented the results of what he termed "probably the bloodiest story in history." He called it a discouraging tale, for its evident moral is that civilization is a precious good, whose delicate complex order and freedom can at any moment be overthrown by barbarians invading from without and multiplying from within…. [E]ternal vigilance is the price of civilization. A nation must love peace, but keep its powder dry. Islamic invaders broke and burned everything beautiful they came across in Hindustan, displaying, as an Indian commentator put it, the resentment of the less developed warriors who felt intimidated in the encounter with a more refined culture. The Muslim sultans built mosques at the sites of torn down temples, and countless Hindus were sold into slavery. As far as the invaders were concerned, Hindus were kafirs par excellence. They, and to a lesser extent the peaceful Buddhists, were not "of the book" — "protected," like Jews and Christians, provided they submit to dhimmitude – but at the receiving end of Muhammad's implacable injunction against pagans: "Kill those who join other gods with God wherever you may find them." (Kuran, 9:5-6) The mountainous northwestern approaches to India are called Hindu Kush, "the Slaughter of the Hindu," a reminder of the days when Hindu slaves from Indian Subcontinent died in the harsh Afghan mountains while being transported to Muslim courts of Central Asia. The slaughter in Somnath, the site of a celebrated Hindu temple, where 50,000 Hindus were slain on Mahmud's orders, set the tone for centuries. The Buddhists were the next to be subjected to mass slaughter in 1193, when Muhammad Khilji also burned their famous library. By the end of the twelfth century, following the Muslim conquest of their stronghold in Bihar, they were no longer a significant presence in India. The survivors retreated into Nepal and Tibet, or escaped to the south of the Subcontinent. The remnants of their culture lingered on even as far west as Turkestan. Left to the tender mercies of Muslim conquerors and their heirs, they were systematically destroyed, sometimes—as was the case with the four giant statues of Buddha destroyed by the Taliban in Afghanistan in March 2001—as late as the first year of the third millennium. That cultivated disposition and developed sensibility can go hand in hand with bigotry and cruelty is evidenced by the example of Firuz Shah, who became the ruler of northern India in 1351. This educated yet tyrannical Muslim ruler once surprised a village where a Hindu religious festival was celebrated and ordered all present to be slain. He proudly related that, upon completing the slaughter, he destroyed the temples and in their place built mosques. The Moghul emperor Akbar is remembered as tolerant, and only one major massacre was recorded during his long reign (1542–1605), when he ordered that about 30,000 captured Rajput Hindus be slain on February 24, 1568, after the battle for Chitod. But Akbar's acceptance of other religions and toleration of their public worship, his abolition of poll-tax on non-Muslims, and his interest in other faiths were not a reflection of his Islamic spirit of tolerance. Quite the contrary, they indicated his propensity for free-thinking experimentation in the realm of religion that finally led him to complete apostasy. Its high points were the formal declaration of his own infallibility in all matters of religious doctrine, his promulgation of a new creed, and his adoption of Hindu and Zoroastrian festivals and practices. Things were back to normal under Shah Jahan (1593–1666), the fifth Mogul Emperor and a grandson of Akbar the Great. Most Westerners remember him as the builder of Taj Mahal and do not know that he was a cruel warmonger who initiated 48 military campaigns against non-Muslims in less than 30 years. Taking his cue from his Ottoman co-religionists, on coming to the throne in 1628 he killed all his male relations except one who escaped to Persia. During his reign, in Benares alone 76 Hindu temples were destroyed, and Christian churches at Agra and Lahore were demolished. At the end of the three-month siege of Hugh, a Portuguese enclave near Calcutta, he had 10,000 inhabitants "blown up with powder, drowned in water, or burnt by fire." More than 4,000 were taken captive to Agra where they were offered Islam or death. Most refused and were killed, except for the younger women who went to harems. The massacres perpetrated by Muslims in India are unparalleled in history. They are bigger in sheer numbers than the Holocaust, or the massacre of the Armenians by the Turks; more extensive even than the slaughter of the South American native populations by the invading Spanish and Portuguese. Major recent attacks by Islamic terrorists in India:
|
suzanne arundhati lauds attacks on the indian state
nov 28th, 2008
can we send this person to pakistan along with teesta, shabana, angana, akhila, biju, vijay, ravisankar, vinay, et al?
by the way, both teesta and shabana live in mumbai, and have been hiding out behind the hindu policemen and soldiers who have taken the bullet for them, i take it? not a peep from them about the rights of the terrorists (sorry, militants)? why aren't they insisting that the terrorists be brought mutton biriyani -- the poor dears must be starving now?
http://www.pej.org/html/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=7508&mode=thread&order=0&thold=0
can we send this person to pakistan along with teesta, shabana, angana, akhila, biju, vijay, ravisankar, vinay, et al?
by the way, both teesta and shabana live in mumbai, and have been hiding out behind the hindu policemen and soldiers who have taken the bullet for them, i take it? not a peep from them about the rights of the terrorists (sorry, militants)? why aren't they insisting that the terrorists be brought mutton biriyani -- the poor dears must be starving now?
http://www.pej.org/html/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=7508&mode=thread&order=0&thold=0
Sonia speak.. LOL time
Madame Sonia, the kindhearted, is claiming that her dynasty's socialist policies are responsible for saving the Indian economy from collapsing completely.
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Indiras_vision_saved_us_from_financial_crisis/articleshow/3740948.cms
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/7749773.stm
First of all, I wonder why its always Sonia who is used to bring the "good news", while she keeps her trap shut about issues like islamic terrorism, this sham democracy and pseudo-liberalism. The dynasty's image should not be tarnished, isnt it so? So poor lapdog Madmoron Singh keeps taking flak for all the things for which the Congress government is responsible, with Sonia staying away but showing up only to hog the limelight.
No, Sonia Gandhi (Maino? Khan? whatever) , you are wrong. The dynasty's communist-socialist policies are the bane of the Indian economy. For fifty years, these policies have controlled us, stopped us from reaching our full potential, and gave us lives of despair and hopelessness. The commie-socialist policies of the dynasty and the Congress party have mentally enslaved India for over 50 years (and still continue to do so, to a large extent). While we cannot keep ruing over the lost opportunities, we are still being held hostage by socialist-commie mindset.
Socialist planning and nationalization slowed down our growth to a crawl. I dread the days when I had to spend hours in a queue in stinking bank offices, just to deposit or withdraw money, with lazy sarkari bank clerks scooting off for chai-nasta every 10 minutes. One actually had to take a day off for this simple activity. These policies kept millions of people in abject poverty, forming a large sized group of people below poverty line (the poverty line was hardly revised to compensate for inflation, in order to get better numbers and show "progress"). The small rich group found their way out by corruption and nepotism, in collusion with the political class. The medium sized middle class spent their lives budgeting their incomes and killing their dreams, running around sarkari offices, greasing palms of corrupt bureaucrats to get their work done. This (mostly Hindu) middle class was also blamed for the ills of India. That Nehru chap even blamed Hinduism for this slow rate of growth.
I am no economist and I dont claim to be one. As far as I can see, as a layman, the current worldwide economic turmoil is the result of banks getting greedy and giving away loans to people who cannot pay back. Also, some oversight on the part of the Bush administration played a role.
More could be found here - http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/26/opinion/26friedman.html?partner=rssnyt&emc=rss
and here - http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/16/opinion/16friedman.html?partner=rssnyt&emc=rss
This financial crisis is not because of absence of socialist/communist policies as Madame wants us to believe. The fact that a higher degree of freedom, true democracy, higher security, emphasis on education and merit and lack of highly socialist-commie policies led to countries like US being more developed than others , is lost on madame Sonia, Madmoron Singh, Chiddu and their ilk.
What I fear the most is that the dynasty and socialist Congressis might use the current financial crisis as an excuse to return to the "golden" Nehruvian age, where the citizens paid the Nehruvian Penalty (C). (http://www.rediff.com/news/2004/jan/14rajeev.htm)
More LOL..
While we sent back a Pakistani teenager who "strayed" into India (was he a spy?) with sweets, chocolates, clothes and CDs, we are sent a boatload of terrorists from Karachi. Good deal indeed, Madmoron and Sonia !! Ok, send back the kid if he is innocent but why the sweets, chocolates and all that effort to appease and grovel in the dirt ?? Lame indeed.
http://www.indianexpress.com/news/naseer-returns-home-to-pakistan-with-unfulfilled-bollywood-dream/389007/
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Indiras_vision_saved_us_from_financial_crisis/articleshow/3740948.cms
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/7749773.stm
First of all, I wonder why its always Sonia who is used to bring the "good news", while she keeps her trap shut about issues like islamic terrorism, this sham democracy and pseudo-liberalism. The dynasty's image should not be tarnished, isnt it so? So poor lapdog Madmoron Singh keeps taking flak for all the things for which the Congress government is responsible, with Sonia staying away but showing up only to hog the limelight.
No, Sonia Gandhi (Maino? Khan? whatever) , you are wrong. The dynasty's communist-socialist policies are the bane of the Indian economy. For fifty years, these policies have controlled us, stopped us from reaching our full potential, and gave us lives of despair and hopelessness. The commie-socialist policies of the dynasty and the Congress party have mentally enslaved India for over 50 years (and still continue to do so, to a large extent). While we cannot keep ruing over the lost opportunities, we are still being held hostage by socialist-commie mindset.
Socialist planning and nationalization slowed down our growth to a crawl. I dread the days when I had to spend hours in a queue in stinking bank offices, just to deposit or withdraw money, with lazy sarkari bank clerks scooting off for chai-nasta every 10 minutes. One actually had to take a day off for this simple activity. These policies kept millions of people in abject poverty, forming a large sized group of people below poverty line (the poverty line was hardly revised to compensate for inflation, in order to get better numbers and show "progress"). The small rich group found their way out by corruption and nepotism, in collusion with the political class. The medium sized middle class spent their lives budgeting their incomes and killing their dreams, running around sarkari offices, greasing palms of corrupt bureaucrats to get their work done. This (mostly Hindu) middle class was also blamed for the ills of India. That Nehru chap even blamed Hinduism for this slow rate of growth.
I am no economist and I dont claim to be one. As far as I can see, as a layman, the current worldwide economic turmoil is the result of banks getting greedy and giving away loans to people who cannot pay back. Also, some oversight on the part of the Bush administration played a role.
More could be found here - http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/26/opinion/26friedman.html?partner=rssnyt&emc=rss
and here - http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/16/opinion/16friedman.html?partner=rssnyt&emc=rss
This financial crisis is not because of absence of socialist/communist policies as Madame wants us to believe. The fact that a higher degree of freedom, true democracy, higher security, emphasis on education and merit and lack of highly socialist-commie policies led to countries like US being more developed than others , is lost on madame Sonia, Madmoron Singh, Chiddu and their ilk.
What I fear the most is that the dynasty and socialist Congressis might use the current financial crisis as an excuse to return to the "golden" Nehruvian age, where the citizens paid the Nehruvian Penalty (C). (http://www.rediff.com/news/2004/jan/14rajeev.htm)
More LOL..
While we sent back a Pakistani teenager who "strayed" into India (was he a spy?) with sweets, chocolates, clothes and CDs, we are sent a boatload of terrorists from Karachi. Good deal indeed, Madmoron and Sonia !! Ok, send back the kid if he is innocent but why the sweets, chocolates and all that effort to appease and grovel in the dirt ?? Lame indeed.
http://www.indianexpress.com/news/naseer-returns-home-to-pakistan-with-unfulfilled-bollywood-dream/389007/
Thursday, November 27, 2008
TOI-let Paper Comes Clean
The TOI-let paper is frankly admitting the stain that's plainly in sight.
A rare moment of confession from them.
How quickly some people find God when they're staring death in the face.
As an atheist, I'm laughing at their sudden piety.
The new toilet flushes 5 times a day.
A rare moment of confession from them.
How quickly some people find God when they're staring death in the face.
As an atheist, I'm laughing at their sudden piety.
The new toilet flushes 5 times a day.
Modi Speaks at Oberoi Site
Narendra Modi is speaking at the site of the Oberoi-Trident hotel. He's mentioning the Pakistan links to this attack.
rajeev on the failing state of india
nov 27th, 2008
the nehruvian stalinists have succeeded in destroying the indian state.
http://rajeev2007.wordpress.com/2008/11/27/towards-a-failed-state-%E2%80%93-ghori-jaichand-and-friends-redux/
the nehruvian stalinists have succeeded in destroying the indian state.
http://rajeev2007.wordpress.com/2008/11/27/towards-a-failed-state-%E2%80%93-ghori-jaichand-and-friends-redux/
Convict she "professor" rationalises Jihadi attacks
Several western "experts" have gone to town, predictably belabouring the silly notion that the identity of the Mumbai terrorist attackers should not be presumed Islamist. But, a convict woman "professor" MARIKA VICZIANY states in a discussion on the convict broadcasting corporation that the Jihadi attacks were retribution for Hindu "atrocities" on those poor Mussulmans...
I don't understand the fascination with Mohammedan buggers that some Caucasian females apparently entertain, but sadly these colonial era fantasies of a few loonies provide the foundation for fantastic theories of Hindu "oppression" and "genocide" of Muslims, motivating Islamist retribution against Westerners..
I don't understand the fascination with Mohammedan buggers that some Caucasian females apparently entertain, but sadly these colonial era fantasies of a few loonies provide the foundation for fantastic theories of Hindu "oppression" and "genocide" of Muslims, motivating Islamist retribution against Westerners..
Shivraj Patil goofs up on national TV
No, apparently not with a callous display of sartorial aggression, this time atleast.
The pathetically inarticulate, comically incompetent and anatomically deficient (spineless?), but very noisy "SECULAR" windbag compromised the anti-terrorist operation by disclosing on live national television the precise number of NSG commandos being deployed and allowing the Jihadis holed up inside Taj hotel access to live cable TV for 12 long hours.
Apparently, even uber-communist, "comrade" A.B Bardhan is disgusted enough to demand the idiot's head. I second that. There ought to be
a "sudden removal" (phrase trademark Karan Thapar) of the anti-Hindu fascist regime. This "SECULARISM" is getting increasingly suffocating.....
The pathetically inarticulate, comically incompetent and anatomically deficient (spineless?), but very noisy "SECULAR" windbag compromised the anti-terrorist operation by disclosing on live national television the precise number of NSG commandos being deployed and allowing the Jihadis holed up inside Taj hotel access to live cable TV for 12 long hours.
Apparently, even uber-communist, "comrade" A.B Bardhan is disgusted enough to demand the idiot's head. I second that. There ought to be
a "sudden removal" (phrase trademark Karan Thapar) of the anti-Hindu fascist regime. This "SECULARISM" is getting increasingly suffocating.....
Who said this and when
"To-day, aspersions are being made regarding police impartiality and capabilities, and while I recognize that much of this is motivated, you must face up to the reality that many are convinced that the police is less than fair. This is so even when policemen die in the line of duty"
The Police 'Must Introspect Deeply':
is it any wonder that we are under attack? of course - Karkare, Salaskar and Kamte were the real devils - er- as for those "militants" - well they are misguided youth.
Jamia 'university' will soon set-up a legal defense fund for the injured terrorist holed up at the Taj Colaba
The Police 'Must Introspect Deeply':
is it any wonder that we are under attack? of course - Karkare, Salaskar and Kamte were the real devils - er- as for those "militants" - well they are misguided youth.
Jamia 'university' will soon set-up a legal defense fund for the injured terrorist holed up at the Taj Colaba
Who's Watching Their Backs?
From the Guardian, UK:
"If we do something wrong, those human rights [people] will come and have our necks so we have to be careful about all these things," said one of the commandos, a stocky, mustachioed man. He gave a boyish smile and shrug before returning to his high-powered scope.I think that says it all.
Jaichand is dead
Raja Jaichand, a leading exponent of "secular progressive" fascist coalition building in India is dead. Nothing to celebrate though. Long live Moily Jaichand. Long live Patil Jaichand .
Seriously, some eminent historians have traced his lineage to the historic Jaichand.
The blood of thousands of students is upon him - killed in the reserva
Seriously, some eminent historians have traced his lineage to the historic Jaichand.
The blood of thousands of students is upon him - killed in the reserva